WSJ's Nord Stream Tall Tale Targets Zelensky, Zaluzhny

Latest stories

How protectionism helps, not hurts, developing nations

The deterrence needed to prevent World War III

Is China conducting 'gray zone' warfare for Russia?

One of the most curious claims is that the Andromeda pulled into the small port town of Sandhamn, about 50 kilometers east of Stockholm, Sweden, apparently after encountering bad weather. WSJ reports that unnamed eyewitnesses say that the Andromeda displayed a“small Ukrainian flag.”

The Sandhamn port in Sweden

Ships calling on ports are expected to display the flag of their origin country. Called Ensigns, the Andromeda should have displayed the flag of Germany if the vessel was owned by German interests and not registered elsewhere (as sometimes is the case).

It would not show the Ukrainian flag because Ukrainians rented the Andromeda, according to the WSJ report.

But this tantalizing fact about the flag says something more. No secret operation to destroy a multibillion-dollar pipeline would display its national flag.

Either there was no Ukrainian operation to blow up the pipeline, in which case the Andromeda could have displayed a Ukrainian flag along with a flag of the vessel's national origin, or if it was a secret operation then displaying such a flag makes no sense.

The story about bad weather also seems like fiction. Photos of the exploded pipeline show sunny weather.

The real question is, what is the origin of the WSJ story and why would a respected newspaper feature a story that cannot be verified with authoritative sourcing?

Valerii Zaluzhny with Colonel General Oleksandr Syrsky (left) during the Battle of Kiev, March 2022.

The WSJ story has undermined both Zelensky's and Zaluzhny's credibility. Was the story fed to the WSJ as preparation for a US operation to replace Zelensky and Zaluzhny?Zaluzhny is now Ukraine's ambassador to the UK, but at the time of the pipeline incident, he was the Chief of Staff of the Ukrainian Armed Forces.

More importantly, he has been touted as a replacement for Zelensky. But Zaluzhny is as hard-line as Zelensky on Russia, so it may be that he is not the preferred Western candidate to replace the Ukrainian leader. WSJ may thus have been used to help knock off both Zelensky and Zaluzhny.

It is noteworthy that the article says that the German authorities do not have evidence on Zaluzhny that they could bring into a courtroom, so Zaluzhny (who has denied any involvement in the Nord Stream sabotage) remains in his job and has not been indicted by any German courts.

Zelensky also has denied any involvement in the Nord Stream pipeline's destruction.

Other writers, most notably veteran investigative reporter Seymour Hersh , have argued that Nord Stream was likely destroyed in a US operation, possibly with help from others. Hersh provided a detailed description of how he believes the sabotage operation unfolded.

He correctly notes that top US officials, including President Joe Biden and former acting undersecretary of state Victoria Nuland, openly pushed for the pipeline's destruction. Once the US declared its desire for its destruction, putting aside who was tasked to carry it out, the US found itself in an awkward position.

The same is true for the German government, which has supported US denials of involvement in the pipeline affair and sought to pass it off on the Ukrainians. While earlier stories did not claim Zelensky's or Zaluzhny's involvement, the newest“leaks” are directly aimed at them. Germany is in lockstep with Washington.

All of this is playing out while the Ukraine war is likely in its last stages. Ukraine's Kursk operation is openly aimed at setting the stage for peace talks with Russia.

It is clear that Zelensky, who is aligned with nationalistic right-wing elements in the army, is the wrong interlocutor for such talks and probably not acceptable to the Russians. If he is soon gone, one can expect a more pliable stand-in to take his place at the negotiating table.