Friday, 23 April 2021 07:22 GMT

Kenya faces devastating Prosopis invasion: What can be done

(MENAFN - The Conversation) Woody plant specieshave been deliberately introducedinto many arid and semi-arid regions across the world as they can help combat desertification and provide resources - like fuelwood - to the rural poor. But some of thesealien trees and shrubshave become invasive, having devastating effects on other species as well as people.

This is big problem in the mainly arid Baringo County, in Kenya's Rift valley as well as other counties north, east and south of the country.

The guilty party isProsopis , also known as Mesquite or 'Mathenge' (Kenya) or 'Promi' (Baringo). It is a thorny shrub or small tree native to Mexico, other South American countries and the Caribbean.It was introducedin Baringo in the 1980s as part of a project to prevent desertification and provide firewood and livestock fodder for local communities. It is deep-rooted, multi-stemmed and produces numerous highly nutritious pods with strongly embedded seeds.

The species is currently naturalised in parts of East Africa, South Africa, Asia and Australia. It provides wood, shade and helps to control soil erosion in degraded areas. Its fruitis usedmainly as livestock fodder and occasionally for food.

Prosopis has no natural enemies in East Africa, such as herbivorous insects and plant pathogens. It has spread rapidly from the original plantations and invaded the surrounding natural grasslands, shrublands, and croplands.

The shrub is particularly difficult to manage because it bears fruit prolifically. Seeds germinate and grow very fast when in contact with moisture. This causes high densities of invasion that easily outcompete other species. When cut, its stems regrow rapidly. Today, the plant is regarded as one of theworld's 100 worstinvasive alien species.

We set outto assesswhat impact it has had in Baringo County since its introduction. We analysed land-use and land-cover changes and dynamics using a combination of dry and wet season satellite data acquired between 1988 and 2016. We then quantified the changes that took place by calculating the extent of Prosopis invasion, rates of spread, gains and losses of different vegetation. And the importance of Prosopis in these changes.

The study established that the rate of invasion is a major threat to the environment and rural people's livelihoods because it suppresses or replaces native biodiversity and alters ecosystem functions and services. In particular, it severely limits livestock production, increases costs of crop production, and depletes the groundwater table, thereby causing significant economic damage.

What we found

Wefoundthat the shrub expanded from 882 hectares in 1988 to 18 792 hectares in 2016. During the same period grasslands declined by 86% irrigated cropland by 57%, and rainfed cropland by 37%.

The spread of Prosopis in Kenya.

We concluded that the Prosopisinvasion was the cause of over 30% of these negative changes and the biggest driving force behind shrinking grasslands and croplands in the region. Besides the invasion, human activities such as deforestation, land clearing, and overgrazing, as well as changes in the weather were also likely to have contributed to the changes.

By 2005, Prosopis invasion in Baringo had intensified. Pastoralists perceived it as the main cause of dwindling grazing lands. This prompteda legal suitbetween the affected pastoral community and the Kenyan government.

In response, the government began a programme to train affected communities on Prosopis management, through an approach famously known as 'Management by Utilisation'. This involved encouraging communities to harvest the trees and produce charcoal, poles and other commercial products as a source of income. At the same time they were encouraged to reseed the reclaimed areas with grass species to sustain livestock.

This practice is now widely used and could partly explain the fact that there was an increase in grassland cover in the area between 2009 and 2016.

But our results show that management by utilisation approach in Baringo has not been effective in stopping or slowing the spread of the plant. This is because most households don't completely remove its stumps because it's tedious and costly. The result is that the plant simply regrows.

What next

Australia uses a combination of techniques to control Prosopis. These include physical, chemical and biological control. It also includes follow-up control work, which is essential to avoid recolonisation.

A key lesson learned in Australia is that management activities across privately and communally managed land and across administrative units should be organised and supervised by commissioned coordinators.

Likewise, sustainable and effective Prosopis management in Kenya and neighbouring countries – such as Tanzania, Somalia, Ethiopia and Sudan – can only be achieved by combining different practices. This should include:

  • physical and chemical control to kill stems and rootstocks;

  • introducing quarantine measures for livestock, where animals are kept a few days to empty their digestive system before moving them from an invaded to an uninvaded area;

  • introducing natural enemies, and;

  • using biological control agents that feed only on the target species to reduce seed production.

Experience shows that early detection and rapid response are crucial. This entails a regular inspection of areas at risk of invasion and the targeted removal of small invading populations at the invasion front. It requires the development, together with scientists and practitioners, of a national strategic plan that provides guidance on best practices for weed management.

Kenya is in the process of developing such a plan. It aims to coordinate efforts across various jurisdictions and affected stakeholders, including national and local government, communities, community based organisations, non-governmental organisations and other environmental agencies, as well as by the private sector and landholders.

Additional contributors: Urs Schaffner; Simon Choge; Albrecht Ehrensperger; Sandra Eckert.

    Invasive species
    Alien species
    Global Perpectives


Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.