Ethnic Slurs, Bo Yang, The Ugly Chinaman And National Character


(MENAFN- Asia Times) What the heck is a“Pajeet”? Han Feizi must have seen the term half a dozen times on twitter before figuring out that it was an ethnic slur directed at Indians. You know you're getting old when you're no longer on the cutting edge of racial slurs. Denizens of Twitter (now X) who follow international Politics will likely have seen the term bandied about by creepy crawly accounts engaged in ethnic flame wars.

Some Indians have been caught off-guard by the new pejorative. For most of living memory, Indians were the subject of small-ball racism like Apu in the Simpsons and Mujibur and Sirajul on David Letterman.

While many Indians have been the victims of post 9-11 anti-Muslim collateral damage, the new slur is disconcertingly targeted toward Hindus. Somewhat mysteriously, malicious anti-brown prejudice has suddenly become all the rage on social media .

Just yesterday, ethnic Indians basked in the international sun while:

  • serving as British prime minister, first minister of Scotland and taoiseach (prime minister) of Ireland;
  • running for US president; and
  • gracing the CEO chairs of major multinational corporations (Google, Microsoft, IBM, Pepsi among many).




And now we're dealing with a“Pajeet” situation. Drilling down, we can find immediate causes – backlash against sudden prominence, Hindu nationalism in India, a recent surge in Indian migrants to the Anglo world, the China-India border conflict and millions of newly online Indians raucously trolling on social media.

On many levels, this slur means Indians have arrived. Reactions of Indians to this new prejudice seem to run the gamut from being aghast at the sudden vitriol, resigned fatalism at the suffering Indians must endure and, creepily, a headlong dive into a Freudian muck of self-hate, telling all who will listen that Indians deserve all the contempt and more.

This piece will not focus on Indians and their Pajeet situation, about which Han Feizi has little expertise. It will be about the“Chinaman” situation, which has dogged the Chinese for 150 years.

Pajeets should consider themselves lucky; internet etymology suggests the slur is less than a decade old, originating from the dark recesses of 4Chan before spreading like wildfire through the cesspool of Twitter.

As a slur, a“Pajeet” and a“Chinaman” are pretty much the same creature – a quasi-human living in squalor, benighted by despotism, unscrupulous in character, out of step with the modern world and ineffectual in all endeavors. Despite these faults, both Pajeets and Chinamen are prone to irrational pride and boastfulness, risible in their pretensions and self-delusion.

MENAFN08112024000159011032ID1108866985


Asia Times

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.