(MENAFN- Trend News Agency)
BAKU, Azerbaijan, July 23. In recent decades,
climate change has become one of the most discussed and pressing
issues at the global level. Economic growth, industrialization, and
population growth have contributed to a significant increase in
greenhouse gas emissions, leading to changes in climate conditions
on the planet. The international community has recognized the need
for joint efforts to combat climate change and to develop
mechanisms to monitor the implementation of countries' commitments
in this area.
One of the key tools in this fight has become the Paris
Agreement, adopted in 2015 under the UN Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC). The Paris Agreement aims to keep global
warming below 2°C and possibly limit it to 1.5°C. Within the
framework of the agreement, each participating country commits to
developing and implementing nationally determined contributions
(NDCs) that reflect efforts to reduce emissions and adapt to
climate change. However, to achieve the targets, it is necessary
not only to formulate ambitious plans but also to effectively
monitor their implementation.
The mechanisms for monitoring the implementation of climate
commitments include various approaches and tools, such as
monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) systems, financial
and technical support, and mechanisms for evaluating and revising
commitments. These mechanisms play an important role in ensuring
transparency, accountability, and building trust among
countries.
The Climate Action Monitor by the Organization of Economic
Co-operation and Development provides a summary of climate action
centered on 51 countries covered under the International Programme
for Action on Climate (IPAC).
The latest OECD report demonstrates that climate change
mitigation commitments in nationally determined contributions are
not reaching the level needed to meet the objectives of the Paris
Agreement.
A global GHG emissions reduction of 43 percent by 2030 (from
2019) is necessary to be on track to achieve the Paris Agreement
goal of limiting temperature to 1.5°C by the end of this century.
However, OECD countries have committed to an estimated emissions
reduction of 28% and OECD partner countries to an emissions
reduction of 5 percent compared to their 2020 emissions. OECD and
OECD partner countries need to increase their emissions reduction
targets by, at least, an additional 30 percent in aggregate to
achieve the projected reductions estimated by the IPCC necessary to
reach the Paris Agreement goal and fill the 'ambition gap'.
The growth rate of national climate action tracked by the OECD
slowed in 2022. The growth rate of national climate actions taken
by both the OECD and its partner countries increased by only 1
percent in 2022. Whereas the average growth rate of actions adopted
from 2000 through 2021 was 10 percent.
The slowdown in 2022 may pose a risk to countries' policy
implementation. Countries still have multiple options to increase
the stringency of existing policies or adopt new policies that are
currently not widely used (e.g., carbon pricing in the building and
transport sector, bans and phase-outs of fossil fuel extraction or
fossil-based infrastructure).
A total of 18 countries have increased their net emissions from
2010 to 2020. Emissions in large-emitting countries such as Brazil,
the People's Republic of China (hereafter“China”), Indonesia and
India are still rising and have not yet reached their expected
peak. Emissions increases in 2020 are estimated at 34 percent in
China and 37 percent in India compared to the 2010 levels.18
Countries will have to reduce their emissions considerably over the
next ten years to achieve the Paris Agreement targets.
The overall slowdown of climate action masks significant
differences across countries and instrument types. For example, 22
OECD and 8 OECD partner countries – jointly accounting for 29
percent of global GHG emissions – intensified climate action in
2022. This increase was driven principally by new or enhanced
net-zero pledges, strengthened regulatory measures, higher prices
in most emissions trading schemes and small advances in
international climate co-operation and international climate
finance. The energy crisis provided further impetus for countries
to adopt more ambitious targets on renewables and energy efficiency
and to accelerate implementation.
Conference of the Parties (COP) is the supreme decision-making
body of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. All States
that are Parties to the Convention are represented at the COP, at
which they review the implementation of the Convention and any
other legal instruments that the COP adopts and take decisions
necessary to promote the effective implementation of the
Convention, including institutional and administrative
arrangements.
Article 15 of the Paris Agreement establishes a Compliance
Committee and sets forth the mechanisms to ensure and facilitate
compliance with the agreement.
The control and implementation procedure takes the form of a
triptych composed of three articulated parts: (1) the transparency
framework, the global stocktake and the compliance mechanism.
One way to address the implementation challenges and enhance
environmental protection is to improve the monitoring and response
mechanisms for noncompliance. Such monitoring must be tailored to
the peculiarities of this specific field of international
cooperation. In implementing the Paris Agreement, the parties to
the Agreement have chosen not to pursue traditional treaty
compliance mechanisms.
The majority of Parties believed it is more important to promote
compliance than to punish noncompliance, especially as the use of
sanctions would discourage countries' participation in the treaty
and thus encourage free riding.
In an exclusive interview with Trend, Fatih Birol, executive
director of the International Energy Agency (IEA), stated that
countries need to make new, nationally determined contributions to
combat climate change.
“All paths lead to Baku. Countries need to make new, nationally
determined contributions. They need to decide what they are going
to do between now and 2035. And those plans need to be ambitious
enough to meet the goal of keeping global warming within 1.5
degrees Celsius. The discussions in Baku will play a very important
role here. This is why the International Energy Agency has decided
to support the COP29 chairmanship so that there will be meaningful
discussions between parties to develop ambitious, nationally
determined contributions.
If they're not ambitious enough, if they fail to help us achieve
the goal of keeping global warming to 1.5°C, that's a bad outcome.
Thus, the COP29 chairmanship needs to encourage all parties to have
ambitious, nationally determined contributions for the next 10
years. All countries and the IEA will fully support the COP29
chairmanship here,” Birol said.
The IEA Executive Director said that at COP29, he would like to
see rich countries, low-income countries, and the North and South
come together to address this global challenge.
“This is a challenge not only for rich countries but also for
poor countries, not only for the North but also for the South, for
all countries. If we can put aside geopolitical divisions and
geopolitical differences and focus on the global challenge, take
some concrete decisions, and agree on concrete goals, COP29 will be
remembered as a successful milestone in achieving this global
goal,” he concluded.
Effective mechanisms to monitor the implementation of climate
commitments are fundamental to achieving the goals of the Paris
Agreement and global climate sustainability. Monitoring, reporting,
and verification allow countries and the international community to
track progress, identify challenges, and adjust strategies to
combat climate change more effectively.
The importance of international cooperation and the exchange of
experience in this area can hardly be overemphasized. The
development of technical and financial capacities, as well as
support for developing countries, are key to the successful
implementation of climate commitments. Moreover, evaluation and
review mechanisms allow countries to improve their plans and
ambitions based on lessons learned and new scientific evidence.
In the future, control mechanisms must continue to be
strengthened and improved to adequately respond to the challenges
of a changing climate. The international community must actively
work to create a fairer and more resilient system that will
contribute to achieving climate goals and protecting our common
future.
X: @Lyaman_Zeyn
MENAFN23072024000187011040ID1108470753
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.