The IQ test wars: why screening for intelligence is still so controversial

(MENAFN- The Conversation) These are questions from online Intelligence Quotient or IQ tests. Tests that purport to measure your intelligence can beverbal , meaning written, ornon-verbal , focusing on abstract reasoning independent of reading and writing skills. First created more than a century ago, the tests are still widely used today to measure an individual's mental agility and ability.

Educationsystems use IQ tests to help identify children for special education and gifted education programmes and to offer extra support. Researchers across the social and hard sciences study IQ test results also looking at everything from their relation togenetics ,socio-economic status ,academic achievement , andrace .

Online IQ 'quizzes'purportto be able to tell you whether or not 'you have what it takes to be a member of the world's most prestigious high IQ society'.

If you want to boast about your high IQ, you should have been able to work out the answers to the questions. When John is 16 he'll be twice as old as his brother. The two families who went bowling each owe £20.61. And 49 is the missing number in the sequence.

Despite the hype, the relevance, usefulness, and legitimacy of the IQ test is stillhotly debatedamong educators, social scientists, and hard scientists. To understand why, it's important to understand the history underpinning the birth, development, and expansion of the IQ test – ahistorythat includes the use of IQ tests to further marginalise ethnic minorities and poor communities.

In the early 1900s, dozens of intelligence tests were developed in Europe and America claiming to offer unbiased ways to measure a person's cognitive ability. Thefirstof these tests was developed by French psychologist Alfred Binet, who was commissioned by the French government to identify students who would face the most difficulty in school. The resulting 1905Binet-Simon Scalebecame the basis for modern IQ testing. Ironically, Binet actually thought that IQ tests wereinadequate measuresfor intelligence, pointing to the test's inability to properly measure creativity or emotional intelligence.

Listen to anaudio versionof this article on The Conversation'sIn Depth Out Loudpodcast.

At its conception, the IQ test provided a relatively quick and simple way to identify and sort individuals based on intelligence – which was and still is highly valued by society. In the US and elsewhere, institutionssuch as the militaryandpoliceused IQ tests to screen potential applicants. They also implemented admission requirements based on the results.

TheUS Army Alpha and Beta Testsscreened approximately 1.75m draftees in World War I in an attempt to evaluate the intellectual and emotional temperament of soldiers. Results were used to determine how capable a solider was of serving in the armed forces and identify which job classification or leadership position one was most suitable for. Starting in the early 1900s, the US education system also began using IQ tests to identify 'gifted and talented' students, as well as those with special needs who required additional educational interventions and different academic environments.

Ironically, some districts in the US have recently employed amaximum IQ scorefor admission into the police force. The fear was that those who scored too highly would eventually find the work boring and leave – after significant time and resources had been put towards their training.

Alongside the widespread use of IQ tests in the 20th century was the argument that the level of a person's intelligence was influenced by their biology. Ethnocentrics and eugenicists, who viewed intelligence and other social behaviours as being determined by biology and race, latched onto IQ tests. They held up the apparent gaps these tests illuminated betweenethnic minorities and whitesor betweenlow- and high-income groups .

Some maintained that these test results provided further evidence that socioeconomic and racial groups weregenetically differentfrom each other and that systemic inequalities were partly a byproduct of evolutionary processes.

The US Army Alpha and Beta test results garnered widespread publicity and were analysed byCarl Brigham , a Princeton University psychologist and early founder of psychometrics, in a 1922 bookA Study of American Intelligence . Brigham applied meticulous statistical analyses to demonstrate that American intelligence was declining, claiming that increased immigration and racial integration were to blame. To address the issue, he called for social policies to restrict immigration and prohibit racial mixing.

A few years before, American psychologist and education researcherLewis Termanhaddrawn connectionsbetween intellectual ability and race. In 1916, he wrote:

There has been considerableworkfrom both hard and social scientistsrefuting argumentssuch as Brigham's and Terman's that racial differences in IQ scores are influenced by biology.

Critiques of such 'hereditarian' hypotheses – arguments that genetics can powerfully explain human character traits and even human social and political problems – cite alack of evidence andweak statistical analyses . This critiquecontinuestoday , with many researchers resistant to and alarmed by research that is still being conducted on race and IQ.

But in theirdarkest moments , IQ tests became a powerful way to exclude and control marginalised communities using empirical and scientific language. Supporters of eugenic ideologies in the 1900s used IQ tests to identify 'idiots', 'imbeciles', and the'feebleminded' . These were people, eugenicists argued, who threatened to dilute the White Anglo-Saxon genetic stock of America.

As a result of such eugenic arguments, many American citizens were latersterilised . In 1927, an infamous ruling by the US Supreme Court legalised forced sterilisation of citizens with developmental disabilities and the 'feebleminded,' who were frequently identified by their low IQ scores. The ruling, known asBuck v Bell , resulted inover 65,000 coerced sterilisationsof individuals thought to have low IQs. Those in the US who were forcibly sterilised in the aftermath of Buck v Bell were disproportionately poor or of colour.

Compulsory sterilisation in the US on the basis of IQ, criminality, or sexual deviance continued formally until the mid 1970s when organisations like the Southern Poverty Law Center began filinglawsuitson behalf of people who had been sterilised. In 2015, the US Senate votedto compensateliving victims of government-sponsored sterilisation programmes.

Debate over what it means to be 'intelligent' and whether or not the IQ test is a robust tool of measurement continues to elicit strong and often opposing reactions today. Some researchers say that intelligence is a conceptspecific to a particular culture . They maintain that it appears differently depending on the context – in the same way that many cultural behaviours would. For example,burpingmay be seen as an indicator of enjoyment of a meal or a sign of praise for the host in some cultures and impolite in others.

What may be considered intelligent in one environment, therefore, might not in others. For example, knowledge about medicinal herbs is seen asa form of intelligencein certain communities within Africa, but does not correlate with high performance on traditional Western academic intelligence tests.

According to some researchers, the 'cultural specificity' of intelligence makes IQ tests biased towards the environments in which they were developed – namely white, Western society. This makes thempotentially problematicin culturally diverse settings. The application of the same test among different communities would fail to recognise the different cultural values that shape what each community values as intelligent behaviour.

Going even further, given theIQ test's historyof being used to further questionable and sometimes racially-motivated beliefs about what different groups of people are capable of, some researchers say such tests cannot objectively and equally measure an individual's intelligence at all.

At the same time, there are ongoing efforts to demonstrate how the IQ test can be used to help those very communities who have been most harmed by them in the past. In 2002, the execution across the US of criminally convicted individuals with intellectual disabilities, who are often assessed using IQ tests, was ruledunconstitutional . This has meant IQ tests have actually prevented individuals from facing 'cruel and unusual punishment' in the US court of law.

In education, IQ tests may be a more objective way to identify children who could benefit from special education services. This includes programmes known as'gifted education'for students who have been identified as exceptionally or highly cognitively able. Ethnic minority children and those whose parents have a low income, areunder-representedin gifted education.

The way children are chosen for these programmes means that Black and Hispanic students areoften overlooked . Some US school districts employadmissions proceduresfor gifted education programmes that rely on teacher observations and referrals or require a family to sign their child up for an IQ test. But research suggests that teacher perceptions and expectations of a student, which can be preconceived, have an impact upon a child'sIQ scores ,academic achievement , andattitudes and behaviour . This means that teacher's perceptions can also have an impact on the likelihood of a child being referred forgiftedorspecial education .

Theuniversal screeningof students for gifted education using IQ tests could help to identify children who otherwise would have gone unnoticed by parents and teachers.Research has foundthat those school districts which have implemented screening measures for all children using IQ tests have been able to identify more children from historically underrepresented groups to go into gifted education.

IQ tests could also helpidentify structural inequalitiesthat have affected a child's development. These could include the impacts of environmental exposure to harmful substances such asleadandarsenicor the effects ofmalnutritionon brain health. All these have been shown to have an negative impact on an individual's mental ability and to disproportionately affect low-income and ethnic minority communities.

Identifying these issues could thenhelpthose in charge of education and social policy to seek solutions. Specific interventions could be designed to help children who have been affected by these structural inequalities or exposed to harmful substances. In the long run, the effectiveness of these interventions could be monitored by comparing IQ tests administered to the same children before and after an intervention.

Some researchers have tried doing this. One USstudy in 1995 used IQ teststo look at the effectiveness of a particular type of training for managing Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), called neurofeedback training. This is a therapeutic process aimed at trying to help a person to self-regulate their brain function. Most commonly used with those who have some sort of identified brain imbalance, it has also been used to treatdrug addiction ,depressionandADHD . The researchers used IQ tests to find out whether the training was effective in improving the concentration and executive functioning of children with ADHD – and found that it was.

Since its invention, the IQ test has generated strong arguments in support of and against its use. Both sides are focused on the communities that have been negatively impacted in the past by the use of intelligence tests for eugenic purposes.

The use of IQ tests in a range of settings, and the continued disagreement over their validity and even morality, highlights not only the immense value society places on intelligence – but also our desire to understand and measure it.

This article was updated on February 1, 2018 to add the word 'each' into the second question at the start of the article.

Race
Racism
Intelligence
Eugenics
Forced sterilisation
Education attainment
IQ tests
In depth

MENAFN2707201901990000ID1098812506