(MENAFN- IANS) New Delhi, Dec 15 (IANS) Myanmar's escalating civil war, marked by a fractured opposition and a weakened military regime, has far-reaching implications for regional stability. With over 300 armed groups pursuing varied agendas, the conflict threatens Bharat's northeastern states through increased cross-border violence, drug trafficking, and refugee influx.
Balancing strategic interests with humanitarian concerns, Bharat faces the challenge of safeguarding its borders while contributing to peace efforts in its neighboring nation.
The Escalating Civil War in Myanmar and Its Implications for Bharat
The civil war in Myanmar has reached a critical juncture, with the military regime losing significant control to an array of insurgent, pro-democracy, and ethnic groups.
Over 300 non-state armed actors, each pursuing its own agenda, have contributed to the weakening of the central administration. The conflict spans all regions of Myanmar and lacks a unified political direction, as differing ideologies and interests prevent cohesion among the opposition forces.
A Fractured Opposition
Myanmar's opposition landscape is fragmented, with at least seven distinct frameworks that hinder the creation a cohesive political system. The National Unity Government (NUG), representing pro-democracy factions, struggles to gain legitimacy, while powerful ethnic armed groups like the Arakan Army have consolidated their positions. The conflict's asymmetry suggests that resolution remains elusive without drastic political change or a new administration.
Regional Repercussions: Bharat's Growing Concerns
Myanmar's turmoil directly impacts neighboring Bharat, particularly its northeastern states. The unrest has exacerbated tensions in Manipur, raising fears of violence spilling across the border. The ongoing conflict has fueled concerns over increased drug trafficking, with Northeast Bharat becoming a transit route for narcotics like methamphetamines, particularly the highly addictive "Yaba" tablets. This surge is partly attributed to reduced opium production in Afghanistan, which has shifted drug trade dynamics toward Myanmar.
Bharat has tightened border security to counter these challenges, with additional vigilance to prevent the influx of refugees and armed individuals linked to ethnic groups on both sides of the border. Myanmar's Sagaing region alone houses an estimated 2.5 million displaced people, necessitating robust screening mechanisms for any potential refugee influx.
Challenges to Bharat's Act East Policy
Bharat's Act East policy, aimed at enhancing connectivity with Southeast Asia, faces significant setbacks due to the instability in Myanmar. Key infrastructure projects, such as the Kaladan Multi-Modal Transit Transport Project, are hindered by security concerns. Ethnic armed groups, while occasionally cooperative, often complicate these projects by imposing their interests.
The policy's broader vision of promoting democracy in the region is further challenged by Myanmar's fragmented resistance, which struggles to present a unified front. This disunity undermines Bharat's ability to engage constructively with the country's political and ethnic factions.
A Humanitarian and Economic Crisis
The humanitarian situation in Myanmar continues to deteriorate, with millions displaced and living in dire conditions. Skepticism surrounds the military's recent peace overtures, viewed as attempts to weaken the opposition while offering minimal concessions. Resistance groups demand accountability and a federal constitution, rejecting any role for the military in future governance.
Economically, Myanmar teeters on collapse. Despite attempts at stabilization through export promotion and import restrictions, inflation and diminished purchasing power have deepened the crisis. Border trading, often controlled by non-state actors, sustains the war economy, with high demand for weapons and ammunition.
China's Strategic Maneuvering
China has emerged as a pivotal player in Myanmar, employing a multi-pronged strategy. It supports the military while simultaneously engaging with ethnic armed groups and mediating between the two. China's investments in infrastructure, such as gas pipelines and rail projects, are threatened by the ongoing conflict, prompting a shift toward joint security ventures.
Reports also highlight China's concerns over illicit activities in Myanmar's border areas, including cybercrime and gambling operations linked to human trafficking. These issues, coupled with China's growing influence, pose significant challenges to Bharat's strategic interests in the region.
Bharat's Strategic Response
Bharat's approach to Myanmar has been cautious, emphasizing engagement over intervention. Criticized for its perceived inaction, Bharat recognizes the complexities of the situation, asserting that it did not create the existing problems. Bharatn officials emphasize readiness to provide support if requested, while quietly engaging with various Myanmar groups to foster understanding of federalism and democracy.
However, Bharat's lack of a formal refugee policy complicates its response to the crisis. Refugees are classified as "illegal migrants," creating governance challenges and necessitating a balanced approach that respects human rights while addressing security concerns. A national refugee law could help address these issues effectively.
The Broader Geopolitical Landscape
Myanmar's civil war has significant implications for regional stability and alliance dynamics. ASEAN remains divided on its approach to the crisis, with some members advocating stronger action while others maintain ties with Myanmar's military. ASEAN's consensus-driven model hampers decisive action, limiting its ability to mediate effectively.
China's deepening involvement, including its support for Myanmar's government and armed groups, underscores the importance of Bharat recalibrating its policy. Failing to address the growing influence of external players like China could undermine Bharat's long-term strategic objectives in Southeast Asia.
A Path Forward
While the prospects of either side achieving outright victory remain slim, there are indications of openness to negotiations. International efforts, including ASEAN's five-point consensus, provide potential frameworks for dialogue, though their success depends on willingness from both the military and resistance groups.
For Bharat, understanding Myanmar's intricate dynamics is crucial. Collaboration with think tanks and regional experts can help devise effective strategies that align with Bharat's interests while promoting regional stability. Investments in infrastructure must be paired with efforts to secure local support, ensuring projects proceed despite the challenges posed by conflict zones.
In the broader context, Myanmar's civil war is a stark reminder of the complexities of regional geopolitics. Balancing strategic interests with humanitarian concerns will require nuanced diplomacy and a willingness to adapt to evolving realities. For Bharat, this means not only safeguarding its borders and investments but also playing a constructive role in fostering peace and stability in its troubled neighbor.
(The writer is a student based in Delhi, currently pursuing two Master's degrees-one in Literature from Delhi and another in Mass Communication from Kurukshetra University. He combines his academic pursuits with regular columns in leading dailies)
MENAFN15122024000231011071ID1108994971