Time For China To Move Past GDP Growth Targets

Thanks to years of“excessive” investment in housing and infrastructure, China's economy remains highly exposed to property market shocks . And at a moment when Xi and Li confront deflationary pressures, high youth unemployment, subpar productivity and a rapidly aging population.

In February, the value of new
home
sales plunged 60% from a year earlier. That followed a more than 34% drop in January. The trouble with such declines is how many members of China's 1.4 billion people the losses affect.

“Home prices became significantly stretched relative to household incomes in the decade before the pandemic, in part because consumers preferred to invest their considerable savings in real estate given the scarcity of attractive alternative savings options,” Hoyle notes.

This collapse, he adds, is unfolding at“a historically rapid pace only seen in the largest housing busts in cross-country experience in the last three decades.”

The reason why a wholesale change in Beijing strategy is needed is that this is“really a structural issue more than a cyclical one,” says William Hurst, a China development expert at the
University of Cambridge.

Since the mid-to-late 2000s, he says, there's been a“strong over-reliance” on land use sales and property development and the problem just“got worse and worse.”

One reason Hurst argues that changing economic models is so hard: local governments are heavily dependent for their revenue on land and a tremendous amount of household wealth is in property.

The crossroads at which Xi and Li find themselves is that“massive new spending and/or lending now would make those asset price bubbles even worse,” Hurst notes.

“It would continue to crowd out consumption and more productive investments. And it would make it more difficult and costly down the road – maybe even prohibitively so – to do this again.”

The thing is, Hurst notes,“inflection points and critical junctures can only be clearly spotted in hindsight. But what we're seeing in China is not the start of something new and probably not the very end of an unwinding of export-led growth that began 15 years ago.”

As Hurst sees it,“we'll likely see serious debate – or at least evidence that it's happening behind the scenes – and possibly a meaningful shift in at least short-term economic policy in China over the coming days and weeks. But any really big macro-level change will be slower in coming and harder to see in real-time.”

One of the biggest debates should be over the logic of releasing a GDP target that puts Beijing on the clock to deliver year after year.

If China doesn't make its annual numbers like some corporate board determined not to disappoint shareholders, global investors reckon Beijing is failing. When China does make its goal, against all odds, many economists doubt the data is accurate.

This self-imposed distraction is coming to something of a head in 2024. China entered the year struggling with its worst deflationary streak since the 1990s amid the Asian financial crisis. Dueling troubles in property and local government finances, and volatile stocks, are only adding to the headwinds zooming Beijing's way.

Given Beijing's determination to alter the economic narrative following a uniquely chaotic 12 months, the impetus may be to set an ambitious target.

As Goldman Sachs analyst Maggie Wei notes, a headline-grabbing number and setting a target for consumer prices could convince skittish investors that Xi and Li are serious about stabilizing the economy. But this merely treats the symptoms, not the causes, of China's troubles.

It's far more important that Xi and Li redouble efforts to repair the property sector, strengthen capital markets, champion the private sector, recalibrate growth engines from exports to domestic demand, internationalize the yuan and build bigger social
safety
nets
to encourage households to save less and spend more.

“Structural challenges including the aging population, weaker productivity growth and elevated debt levels will continue to weigh on potential growth over the medium term,” says Madhavi Bokil, an analyst at Moody's Investors Service.“For now, the economic environment remains difficult, with factors that stymied growth in 2023 still present.”

Bokil notes that“protracted decline in the property sector, deterioration in regional and local governments' strength, domestic policy uncertainty, slower global demand growth and high geopolitical tensions present hurdles to the growth outlook.”

The consumer and business sentiment“remain relatively low,” Bokil adds.“Property sector transactions and prices have yet to stabilize. Subdued price pressures, seen in the decline in producer prices of manufactured goods and the GDP deflator since 2023, reflect both moderating commodity prices and muted demand growth. Downward pressures on prices will likely remain in place in 2024 until the domestic economic momentum strengthens, resulting in inflation firming in 2025.”

Sign up for one of our free newsletters

• The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories
• AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories

The NPC is China's chance to map out reform plans for 2024. One area of intense speculation is why Li won't hold the traditional premier press conference at the close of the NPC, the first time it's happened since 1993. As NPC spokesman Lou Qinjian announced today (March 4):“Barring any special circumstances, this arrangement will continue for the remainder of this term of the NPC.”

Some investors might read this as another sign China is becoming more opaque. The loss of this rare chance for China's No 2 leader to interact with the public – and foreign reporters – coincides with the party clamping down on corporate data, court disclosure and academic documents while tightening further its grip on Hong Kong.

Others posit that it's a sign Xi is further consolidating power.“This may be another way to downgrade the importance of the premier,” Dongshu Liu, an assistant professor at the City University of Hong Kong, told Bloomberg.

Either way, Tuesday will be a highly informative day for global investors on Xi's efforts to promote more sustainable growth in the year ahead and beyond.

“We're closely watching the government's attitude toward the progress of the 14th Five-year Plan,” says strategist Xing Zhaopeng at ANZ Research.“We also expect the government to take the climate target seriously and more green policies are expected in the next two years.”

A worker installs polycrystalline silicon solar panels as terrestrial photovoltaic power in Yantai, China. Photo: Twitter Screengrab

Yet few gestures would telegraph a major shift in China's policy direction more than scrapping the GDP target.

Analysts at S&P Global have argued that“China's best-case scenario would be to demote GDP to a position that it holds in most advanced economies. Rather than being an official target, GDP is seen as the outcome of decisions by households, firms and the government regarding consumption and investment .”

In other words, China's GDP numbers are something bigger and more complicated than the government alone can manufacture. Allowing China to grow at the rate it grows, without explanation and drama, would free Xi and Li to worry less about big stimulus packages, white-elephant projects and giant bailouts for weak corporate links and make room for greater reform, disruption and risk-taking.

The longer China shackles itself to an arbitrary GDP goal, the more it incentivizes unproductive and ultimately unsustainable economic growth strategies.

Follow William Pesek on X, formerly Twitter, at @WilliamPesek

Already have an account? Sign i Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories OR

Thank you for registering!

An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.