(MENAFN- AzerNews) By Yusif Abbaszada
The decades-long tittle-tattle of Armenians has yielded no
results other than getting on the nerves of not only Azerbaijanis
but also foreign masters acting behind the curtain. Another attempt
to spread lies was shut down and the world has once again seen the
true face of the deceiver and propagandist.
We are talking about the interview the so-called“state
minister” of the separatist Karabakh, Ruben Vardanyan, gave to
BBC's HARDtalk chat show. Right from the top of the interview,
Stephen Sackur made it clear to Vardanyan that the journalist has
no intention of meaningless chit-chat and the safe pillow of deceit
and indulgence is nearing its logical conclusion. Sackur set out to
expose the pretense and false propaganda that the Armenians
themselves have been fed for so long.
In response to Sackur's question, Vardanyan chose to deny his
proximity to Putin, thus revealing how unreliable and untrustworthy
he is as he made futile attempts to reject obvious secrets on how
he came to own his billions.
One got the impression that the topic of the war between Ukraine
and Russia was taboo for Ruben Vardanyan. The reason for such
secrecy was not Vardanyan's position, but his fear of losing an
ally in the person of Russia. Immediately sensing this, Stephen
began to ask questions on this topic, thereby confusing the
separatist. By dodging to express his attitude towards the Russian
war in Ukraine, he proved whose project he is.
The matter is that Sackur is aware of Vardanyan's special
mission in Karabakh. Thus, it was no place for excuses as the
conversation acquired a completely different turn for the Karabakh
separatist.
The topic of the day was Karabakh, which Vardanyan tried in
every way possible to raise and develop, receiving a sharp question
instead of dodging Sackur's questions. Instead of compassion and
consolation, the liar received sharp criticism and a direct
question: how does he see the further development of the
events?
Vardanyan's frail attempts to bring attention to the topic of
Karabakh were met with sharp criticism in lieu of compassion and
consolation.
As the interviewer was left with no answer about the future
developments of the events, he reviled that there are only two real
scenarios. The first is to sign a peace agreement with Azerbaijan,
and the second is to leave the territory of Karabakh. Fairy tales
about the greatness of Armenian culture and the antiquity of all
Armenians were already out of place, but the confused Ruben tried
to save the situation with all his might.
The interviewer also raised a question about tense relations
between Vardanyan and the Armenian government, which the separatist
chieftain clumsily evaded.
The answer to what is the precise relationship of the Kremlin
henchman with the Armenian government is unclear, but what can be
said for sure is that the entire Armenian population experienced
second-hand embarrassment that day.
Legends and tales about great Armenia are passed down from
generation to generation, and Ruben Vardanyan himself can become a
new hero of Armenian folklore.
Armenia can turn anything into a fairytale and turn any of its
antagonists into a protagonist. This way, a snake is transformed
into a 'valiant defender of the rights of all heroic
Armenians'.
Jokes practically write themselves on the topic of the shameful
interview but one thing remains clear - Ruben is in a hopeless
situation and reached an impasse. Two possible solutions – to sign
an agreement or leave Karabakh - were proposed to him during the
conversation.
Any dispute has its end no matter the length Armenia goes on to
drag it out. In this case, all limits have been exhausted and based
on the interview, Armenians have only two options left both of
which benefit Azerbaijan.
---