'We Are More Like A Matrimonial And Bail Court Now, Soon Will Become...': Supreme Court

2025-09-26 03:13:40

(MENAFN- Live Mint) The Supreme Court on Friday noted that it is increasingly acting as a matrimonial and bail court, due to the growing number of such cases coming before it, according to a report by Bar and Bench.

A bench consisting of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta made this remark while considering a plea from an Army officer. The officer requested the Court's help in matrimonial case proceedings that had been repeatedly adjourned before the Rajasthan High Court .

The bench observed that although constitutional matters are pending hearing, the Court is increasingly burdened by matrimonial disputes across the country, noting that it may soon become a predominantly matrimonial court.

Also Read | SC upholds JSW's takeover of Bhushan Power in review What did the Supreme Court say?

"If we start entertaining these matters for being adjourned, this Court would be flooded with divorce petitions from all over the country...all divorce matters will come before this Court. As it is, we are more of a matrimonial and bail court now. Soon, it will become totally matrimonial,” the report quoted the court's oral statement.

The lawyer representing the army officer argued that the case had not been heard by the High Court despite being listed multiple times. Based on this, he requested the intervention of the Supreme Court. He also asked that the Court issue a notice specifically concerning mediation to help reach a settlement.

Also Read | SC allows manufacture of greencrackers in Delhi-NCR but condition applies

Justice Nath, however, warned that if the Court began to entertain such pleas solely based on adjournments in the High Cour , it could lead to an overwhelming surge of matrimonial cases across the country.

“If we start entertaining these matters for being adjourned....this Court would be flooded with divorce petitions from all over the country,” Justice Nath was quoted as saying.

Following these observations, the petitioner's lawyer requested permission to withdraw the plea and to be allowed to approach the High Court for an early hearing. The Court granted this request.

MENAFN26092025007365015876ID1110116932

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.