Aeromexico Named The Most On-Time Global Airline In 2024:
|
Rank |
Airline Code |
Airline Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
AM |
Aeroméxico |
86.70% |
|
2 |
SV |
Saudia |
86.35% |
|
3 |
DL |
Delta Air Lines |
83.46% |
|
4 |
LA |
LATAM Airlines |
82.89% |
|
5 |
QR |
Qatar Airways |
82.83% |
|
6 |
AD |
Azul Airlines |
82.42% |
|
7 |
AV |
Avianca |
81.80% |
|
8 |
IB |
Iberia |
81.58% |
|
9 |
SK |
Scandinavian Airlines |
81.40% |
|
10 |
UA |
United Airlines |
80.93% |
In Europe the leading airlines were:
|
Rank |
Airline Code |
Airline Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
I2 |
Iberia Express |
84.69% |
|
2 |
IB |
Iberia |
81.58% |
|
3 |
SK |
Scandinavian Airlines |
81.40% |
|
4 |
VY |
Vueling Airlines |
81.20% |
|
5 |
DY |
Norwegian |
79.23% |
|
6 |
UX |
Air Europa |
78.99% |
|
7 |
OS |
Austrian Airlines |
78.72% |
|
8 |
SN |
Brussels Airlines |
77.77% |
|
9 |
LO |
LOT Polish Airlines |
77.72% |
|
10 |
D8 |
Norwegian Air Sweden |
76.04% |
In North America the leading airlines were:
|
Rank |
Airline Code |
Airline Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
DL |
Delta Air Lines |
83.46% |
|
2 |
UA |
United Airlines |
80.93% |
|
3 |
AS |
Alaska Airlines |
79.25% |
|
4 |
AA |
American Airlines |
77.78% |
|
5 |
WN |
Southwest Airlines |
77.77% |
|
6 |
NK |
Spirit Airlines |
76.05% |
|
7 |
B6 |
JetBlue Airlines |
74.53% |
|
8 |
F9 |
Frontier Airlines |
71.57% |
|
9 |
AC |
Air Canada |
71.36% |
|
10 |
WS |
WestJet |
70.99% |
In Asia Pacific the leading airlines were:
|
Rank |
Airline Code |
Airline Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
JL |
Japan Airlines |
80.90% |
|
2 |
NH |
All Nippon Airways |
80.62% |
|
3 |
SQ |
Singapore Airlines |
78.67% |
|
4 |
NZ |
Air New Zealand |
77.58% |
|
5 |
FD |
Thai AirAsia |
77.46% |
|
6 |
VN |
Vietnam Airlines |
76.70% |
|
7 |
PR |
Philippine Airlines |
76.06% |
|
8 |
GA |
Garuda Indonesia Airlines |
75.30% |
|
9 |
CX |
Cathay Pacific Airlines |
75.19% |
|
10 |
QF |
Qantas Airways |
73.93% |
In Latin America the leading airlines were:
|
Rank |
Airline Code |
Airline Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
CM |
Copa Airlines |
88.22% |
|
2 |
AM |
Aeroméxico |
86.70% |
|
3 |
BW |
Caribbean Airlines |
85.47% |
|
4 |
G3 |
Gol Linhas Aereas |
84.09% |
|
5 |
AR |
Aerolineas Argentinas |
83.06% |
|
6 |
LA |
LATAM Airlines |
82.89% |
|
7 |
AD |
Azul Airlines |
82.42% |
|
8 |
AV |
Avianca |
81.80% |
|
9 |
H2 |
Sky Airlines |
76.67% |
|
10 |
JA |
JetSmart Chile |
73.23% |
In the Middle East and Africa the leading airlines were:
|
Rank |
Airline Code |
Airline Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
FA |
Safair |
93.82% |
|
2 |
WY |
Oman Air |
90.27% |
|
3 |
RJ |
Royal Air Jordanian |
87.02% |
|
4 |
SV |
Saudia |
86.35% |
|
5 |
KU |
Kuwait Airways |
84.63% |
|
6 |
GF |
Gulf Air |
84.11% |
|
7 |
QR |
Qatar Airways |
82.83% |
|
8 |
EY |
Etihad Airways |
76.91% |
|
9 |
EK |
Emirates |
74.42% |
|
10 |
FZ |
Flydubai |
70.44% |
The leading low-cost carriers were:
|
Rank |
Airline Code |
Airline Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
I2 |
Iberia Express |
84.69% |
|
2 |
G3 |
Gol |
84.09% |
|
3 |
AD |
Azul Airlines |
82.42% |
|
4 |
MM |
Peach Aviation |
82.32% |
|
5 |
VY |
Vueling Airlines |
81.20% |
|
6 |
G4 |
Allegiant Air |
79.31% |
|
7 |
DY |
Norwegian |
79.23% |
|
8 |
QZ |
Indonesia AirAsia |
78.97% |
|
9 |
WN |
Southwest Airlines |
77.77% |
|
10 |
FD |
Thai AirAsia |
77.46% |
Global Airport leaders were:
|
Rank |
Airport Code |
Airport Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
RUH |
Riyadh King Khalid Intl Airport |
86.65% |
|
2 |
LIM |
Lima Jorge Chavez Intl Airport |
84.57% |
|
3 |
MEX |
Mexico City Benito Juarez Intl Airport |
84.04% |
|
4 |
SLC |
Salt Lake City Intl Airport |
83.80% |
|
5 |
SCL |
Santiago Arturo Merino Benitez Intl Airport |
82.84% |
|
6 |
MSP |
Minneapolis-Saint Paul Intl Airport |
82.27% |
|
7 |
IAD |
Washington Dulles Intl Airport |
82.23% |
|
8 |
DTW |
Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport |
82.06% |
|
9 |
OSL |
Oslo Gardermoen Airport |
81.91% |
|
10 |
DOH |
Doha Hamad Intl Airport |
81.38% |
Large Airports leaders were:
|
Rank |
Airport Code |
Airport Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
RUH |
Riyadh King Khalid Intl Airport |
86.65% |
|
2 |
HNL |
Honolulu Intl Airport |
85.45% |
|
3 |
LIM |
Lima Jorge Chavez Intl Airport |
84.57% |
|
4 |
MEX |
Mexico City Benito Juarez Intl Airport |
84.04% |
|
5 |
SLC |
Salt Lake City Intl Airport |
83.80% |
|
6 |
SCL |
Santiago Arturo Merino Benitez Intl Airport |
82.84% |
|
7 |
LGA |
New York LaGuardia Airport |
82.39% |
|
8 |
MSP |
Minneapolis-Saint Paul Intl Airport |
82.27% |
|
9 |
IAD |
Washington Dulles Intl Airport |
82.23% |
|
10 |
DTW |
Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport |
82.06% |
Medium Airports leaders were:
|
Rank |
Airport Code |
Airport Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
PTY |
Panama Tocumen Intl Airport |
90.34% |
|
2 |
BSB |
Brasilia Intl Airport |
88.19% |
|
3 |
ITM |
Osaka Itami Intl Airport |
88.18% |
|
4 |
SDU |
Rio de Janeiro Santo Dumont Airport |
88.17% |
|
5 |
PDX |
Portland Intl Airport |
84.86% |
|
6 |
SJC |
San Jose Mineta Intl Airport |
84.74% |
|
7 |
AEP |
Buenos Aires Jorge Newbery Airfield |
83.30% |
|
8 |
VCP |
Viracopos-Campinas Intl Airport |
83.26% |
|
9 |
SMF |
Sacramento Intl Airport |
82.77% |
|
10 |
KWI |
Kuwait Intl Airport |
81.59% |
Small Airports leaders were:
|
Rank |
Airport Code |
Airport Name |
On-Time Performance (OTP) |
|
1 |
GYE |
Guayaquil Jose Joaquin de Olmedo Intl Airport |
91.38% |
|
2 |
UIO |
Quito Mariscal Sucre Intl Airport |
90.05% |
|
3 |
CPT |
Cape Town Intl Airport |
89.39% |
|
4 |
SAL |
El Salvador Intl Airport |
89.33% |
|
5 |
KOA |
Ellison Onizuka Kona Intl Airport |
88.61% |
|
6 |
SVG |
Stavanger Airport |
86.73% |
|
7 |
BOI |
Boise Air Terminal |
86.21% |
|
8 |
NGO |
Nagoya Chubu Centrair Intl Airport |
85.98% |
|
9 |
FOR |
Fortaleza Pinto Martins Intl Airport |
85.32% |
|
10 |
SSA |
Salvador Intl Airport |
85.21% |
About Cirium
Cirium® is the world's most trusted source of aviation analytics. The company delivers powerful data and cutting-edge analytics to empower a wide spectrum of industry players. Equipping airlines, airports, travel enterprises, aircraft manufacturers, and financial entities with the clarity and intelligence they need to optimize their operations, make informed decisions, and accelerate revenue growth.
Cirium® is part of LexisNexis® Risk Solutions, a RELX business, which provides information-based analytics and decision tools for professional and business customers. The shares of RELX PLC are traded on the London, Amsterdam and New York Stock Exchanges using the following ticker symbols: London: REL; Amsterdam: REN; New York: RELX.
For further information please follow Cirium® on LinkedIn or visit cirium.
View source version on businesswire:
Permalink
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment