
Politicians Must Maintain Respectful Language Even In Criticism: Karnataka High Court
The ruling came during a hearing involving BJP state president BY Vijayendra and Prashant Makanur, who had filed a criminal petition seeking the cancellation of FIRs registered against them for sharing derogatory posts about Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar on social media. Justice Krishna S. Dixit presided over the case, temporarily staying the FIRs and issuing notices to the Malleshwaram station police.
Karnataka High Court halts horse racing events at Bengaluru Turf Club
In his remarks, Justice Dixit expressed displeasure over the language used in the posts, underscoring that foul language should never be employed in political discourse. He urged politicians to use respectful and beautiful language, marked by love, responsibility, courtesy, and restraint. The judge stressed that during elections, the connection between one's tongue and brain should not falter.
Drawing a historical parallel, the judge recalled an instance involving former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee. When asked to write the foreword for a book titled "Indira Javabdo," Vajpayee insisted it be changed to "Indira ji Jawabdo" to maintain a respectful tone. This, the judge noted, exemplifies the importance of using respectful language, even in criticism.
Justice Dixit also reminded politicians that the opposition is not an enemy and that power dynamics can shift. He cautioned against speaking ill of those in constitutional positions and emphasized that even social media posts should be considerate and non-acidic.
Karnataka High Court grants bail to woman accused of killing husband for opposing extra-marital affair
Addressing concerns about the unpleasant incidents during elections, the court acknowledged the government's condemnation of such events but stressed that public insults toward the CM and DCM are unacceptable. While the petitioners were not required to attend the hearing, the state government prosecutor, B.N. Jagdish, requested the investigation to continue. However, the court questioned the feasibility of investigating everyone involved in such incidents, suggesting that jailing everyone would be impractical and unreasonable.
The bench concluded by emphasizing that investigations should focus on those committing heinous crimes and that the judicial system must strike a balance to avoid overcrowding jails with individuals for minor infractions.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Bydfi Joins Seoul Meta Week 2025, Advancing Web3 Vision And South Korea Strategy
- Gamesquare Announces Pricing Of Underwritten Public Offering To Launch Ethereum Treasury Strategy
- Blossom Fund Launches BLOS Token, Offering Retail Investors Access To A Professionally Managed Stock Portfolio
- B2BROKER Partners With Website Studio Agency To Offer Website Solutions For Financial Brokers
- R0AR Introduces Unified Defi Platform For Token, Liquidity, And NFT Staking
- Multibank Group Announces Early Access Waitlist For Pioneering $MBG Token
Comments
No comment