The Nippon Steel Deal: Taking Another Look

The Japanese, in effect, did this as a favor to the Americans. They could have let the Wall Street firm collapse owing to the irresponsibility of its own making – and stepped in to profit. They didn't.

But does letting foreign entities own a US company put us at risk?

That depends on which foreigners and on the particular deal.

In this case, Japan is a longtime ally – and an excellent partner. Also, the deal benefits both nations.

Japan's existence as an independent country depends on the United States and the
US military .

And Tokyo knows that very well.

A weak America is dangerous for Japan.

Investing in US Steel and modernizing it will create great-paying jobs in the US. More importantly, it will secure a strategic asset the United States has neglected that serves as an insurance policy for the survival of Japan.

Opponents haven't produced a believable scenario in which Nippon Steel would (or could) shut down US steel production. Or in which it could create any political brouhaha that would endanger the essential US-Japan relationship and defense coverage.

As importantly, Japanese investment has been good for the nation.

Toyota , Nissan and Honda are just the most well-known Japanese companies in America. Moreover, they support over 450,000 manufacturing jobs in the United States.

Japan is the leading overall foreign investor in the United States – to include huge research and development operations.

The litmus test: Americans want to work for Japanese companies. And union organizers have a tough time convincing them they are unhappy.

Does anyone remember the 1980s when Japan and its companies were demonized on Capitol Hill and elsewhere? We were all destined to become Japan's slaves as it destroyed and took over our economy – and our country.

Hardly.

But this echo from the past sounds like what's being said now will happen to American workers if Nippon Steel takes over US Steel. Lose jobs, pensions, everything.

Less publicized is that actual US Steel employees support Nippon Steel's investment in modernizing their operations, and making it a stronger company.

Listen to deal opponents and one would think Nippon Steel were conspiring with the People's Republic of China to destroy a US company.

Like many other companies, Nippon Steel has business dealings in the PRC.

These should be carefully and accurately assessed for real security risks. And not shaded to keep the United Steelworkers union bosses happy.

If necessary, Nippon Steel should be required to modify or even end any China operations.

And so should Boeing , General Electric, Ford, GM, Tesla , Honeywell and the hundreds of other American companies in the China market. They have done far more than Nippon Steel to build up the Chinese economy and the People's Liberation Army over the last four decades.

Remember the Chinese
spy balloon
that flew over America in 2023? You may have noticed the Biden administration won't release a report on what it found. A likely reason is that the balloon's innards had American components.

Probably.

One doubts we'd be having this debate if a British company were trying to buy US Steel. Does anybody care that Chrysler is owned by the Italians and the French? Also, there is an air of“yellow peril” in some of the commentary .

However, the racism angle is a wash in this case. Look back a few years ago to when it appeared Renault would take over Nissan. Company executives and Japanese government officials effectively took Nissan Chairman Carlos Ghosn hostage via charges of corporate misconduct. Furthermore, along with him, they arrested a senior executive, Greg Kelly , an American.

Both the US and Japan need to remember they are friends and avoid dredging up resentments. They need to stay focused on defending themselves.

This wouldn't be the first time.

Sign up for one of our free newsletters

• The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories
• AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories

American automakers in the 1970s and 1980s were losing billions and turning out shoddy cars nobody wanted to buy. Just look up“K-Car” on the internet. The Japanese in effect forced Detroit to get its act together.

Furthermore, Japan backed off and gave the American carmakers the breathing space to get their acts together.

Was that embarrassing? Sure. Infuriating? Sometimes. And some Japanese gloating was sometimes too much.

But it worked out pretty well for everyone.

Damage Done?

Don't think Japan isn't irked by Nippon Steel's treatment. Japan has always been insecure about the American commitment.

Tokyo won't be mollified by lines like“This is just business” or“This is just politics.”

Japan might fairly wonder how reliable an ally the US is.

And one day when the Chinese get rough with Japan, maybe a US administration will decide it just can't defend Japan. Nothing personal, and we still love you. But an election is coming up or (fill in the blank).

The alliance won't collapse if the Nippon Steel deal is turned down. But it will leave a scar, instead of deepening and strengthening the US-Japan relationship.

Early 20th century US Steel coal miners including the author's grandfather, Mike Hlohinecz (far left). Photo: ©Grant Newsham family

The writer's grandfather, Michal Hlohinecz, was a miner in one of the US Steel coal mines many years ago. What would he think about all this? I have no idea. But he might have taken some offense at the idea that“foreigners” are the problem.

And in the case of the Nippon Steel deal, the Japanese are not the problem.

Grant Newsham is a retired US Marine officer and former US diplomat. He is the author of the book When China Attacks: A Warning To America .

This article was originally published by Japan Forward . It is republished with permission.

Already have an account? Sign i Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories OR

Thank you for registering!

An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.