(MENAFN- Swissinfo)
Português
(pt)
A maioria dos suíços quer restringir os fogos de artifício para pessoas físicas
The fireworks initiative enjoys strong support among the population, according to the survey: 76% of all respondents are in favour of the initiative and 24% are against. Most of the participants took a clear stance. Only 11% would have chosen the“rather yes” or“rather no” option.
According to the survey, which was commissioned by the news portal Watson and published on Friday, the majority of Green voters were most in favour: 92% were in favour of restricting the use of fireworks by private individuals. A majority in the centre-right camp were also in favour of such a restriction. The initiative received the least support from Radical-Liberal voters, with 62%.
Stress in pets and farm animals
“Stress in pets and farm animals” and“stress in wild animals” were the main reasons given for supporting the initiative. Air pollution also played an important role.
+ How the Swiss direct democracy system works
Around a quarter of those surveyed said they were against the initiative. In their opinion, fireworks are a tradition and a part of life. In addition, there are already too many regulations and bans. A ban on fireworks also does not belong in the constitution, they said.
The fireworks initiative wants to restrict the sale and setting off of loud fireworks for private individuals. Pyrotechnic products that are set off without making noise should remain authorised. Large professional public fireworks displays at events should also continue to be permitted if they are authorised on request. The initiative was declared valid with 137,193 votes in favour.
The Watson survey was conducted between December 14 and 20 in collaboration with the social research institute Demoscope; 8,250 people from German-speaking and French-speaking Switzerland were surveyed.
Send us your input
Do you have more questions about this story?
Your contribution Our journalists will take your contribution on board for their coverage and may follow up with you via email. If you have questions, get in touch . Your contribution... How we work
This news story has been written and carefully fact-checked by an external editorial team. At SWI swissinfo we select the most relevant news for an international audience and use automatic translation tools such as DeepL to translate it into English. Providing you with automatically translated news gives us the time to write more in-depth articles. You can find them hereExternal link .
If you want to know more about how we work, have a look hereExternal link , and if you have feedback on this news story please write to ...External link .
End of insertion External Content Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again. Almost finished... We need to confirm your email address. To complete the subscription process, please click the link in the email we just sent you. Daily news
Get the most important news from Switzerland in your inbox.
Daily
Email
The SBC Privacy Policy provides additional information on how your data is processed.
I consent to the use of my data for the SWI swissinfo newsletter.
Articles in this story
Do you have more questions about this story?
In compliance with the JTI standards
More: SWI swissinfo certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at ... .
MENAFN29122023000210011054ID1107668846
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.