(MENAFN- AzerNews)
Akbar Novruz
Read more
The website for the US Agency for International Development, or
USAID, appeared to be offline on Saturday, as the Trump
administration moves to put the free-standing agency, and its
current $42.8bn budget for global humanitarian operations, under
state department control. The sudden shutdown has fueled
speculation that President Donald trump is preparing to dissolve
USAID entirely, consolidating its functions within the State
Department as part of his "America First" foreign policy
agenda.
A stripped-down version of the USAID website briefly appeared on
the State Department's official page, signaling that some of its
responsibilities may have already been transferred. This comes amid
mounting fears among Democratic lawmakers and international aid
organizations that the agency-once a pillar of U.S. global
influence-could face a permanent shutdown.
Reports indicate that USAID's headquarters in Washington is in
disarray, with signs bearing the agency's logo being removed and
mission directors abroad possibly being recalled. Employees,
speaking anonymously due to a gag order, described a chaotic
atmosphere, with at least half of the workforce reportedly laid
off.
Trump has long been critical of USAID, arguing that foreign
assistance wastes taxpayer money while failing to advance American
interests. His administration had previously sought to curtail
foreign aid programs, viewing them as unnecessary expenditures.
However, a complete dissolution of USAID would mark a drastic shift
in U.S. global engagement, potentially impacting American influence
abroad.
While USAID's closure is now a reality, Azerbaijan had already
taken decisive action against the agency months earlier. Baku
terminated USAID's operations on July 1, 2024, citing the
organization's interference in domestic affairs and failure to
align with Azerbaijan's national interests. Foreign Minister Jeyhun
Bayramov explained that USAID had operated in Azerbaijan for over
two decades, but its agenda was ultimately designed to serve U.S.
geopolitical interests rather than genuine development
assistance.
Azerbaijan's pushback against USAID
The decision to expel USAID from Azerbaijan was the culmination
of years of growing frustration with the agency's activities.
President Ilham Aliyev, in an interview with“Rossiya Segodnya” in December 2024,
openly criticized USAID's persistent attempts to impose its
influence:
This stance reflected Azerbaijan's broader policy shift,
prioritizing sovereignty over foreign aid that came with political
conditions. Bayramov further noted that while USAID presented
itself as a development partner, its real goal was to promote U.S.
interests, particularly in sensitive areas like political parties,
ethnic minorities, and media. He stated:
"We reviewed the provisions of the agreement with USAID and how
it had been implemented over the past years. It turned out that
their activities were not in the format of Azerbaijan's wishes and
interests, but rather served to implement the U.S. agenda in
Azerbaijan. On this basis, we sent notifications and declared that
we were not interested in extending the agreement under those
conditions."
USAID's role in the South Caucasus: a tool of
influence
USAID had been deeply embedded in the South Caucasus region
since the collapse of the Soviet Union, positioning itself as a key
player in the economic and political transformation of Azerbaijan,
Georgia, and Armenia. While its official mission focused on
governance, democracy, and economic development, its operations
frequently aligned with U.S. strategic interests-a pattern observed
in numerous countries where the agency has been active.
USAID's influence in Armenia, in particular, had drawn
intensified scrutiny in recent years. After Azerbaijan's
restoration of sovereignty in Garabagh, the agency significantly
increased financial aid to Armenia, fueling suspicions that this
was intended to support revanchist elements (e.g. ammunition, guns)
rather than purely humanitarian efforts. In 2023, USAID head
Samantha Power announced a $100 million aid package for Armenians
leaving Garabagh, while remaining silent on the decades-long
displacement of Azerbaijanis from their lands. Without any
exaggeration this is yet the tip of the iceberg.
Additionally, in September 2023, shortly after Azerbaijan
conducted its 23-hour anti-terror operation to restore full
sovereignty, the United States took an unprecedented step by
refusing to renew the waiver of Amendment 907, effectively
reinstating restrictions on aid to Azerbaijan. This move was seen
as a punishment for Baku's decisive action in Garabagh and further
eroded trust in Washington's intentions.
Matter of fact, Azerbaijan is not the only country to reject
USAID's involvement. Over the past five years, multiple governments
have pushed back against the agency, recognizing its role in
political interference rather than genuine development. USAID has
been expelled from Russia, Belarus, Turkmenistan, Zimbabwe,
Venezuela, Bolivia, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, among
others.
The growing rejection of USAID's operations underscores a
broader global shift-nations asserting their sovereignty and
refusing to be pawns in geopolitical power struggles. Azerbaijan's
stance against USAID was a clear message that it will not tolerate
foreign influence under the guise of aid.
With the official shutdown of USAID on February 1, the
organization no longer exists as an independent entity, and its
legacy as a tool of U.S. foreign policy is under intense scrutiny.
Trump administration is running an investigation regarding this
issue. Elon Musk, co-founder of Tesla and the owner of 'X', who was
appointed by US President Donald Trump to lead the Department of
Government Efficiency (DOGE), also branded USAID a“criminal
organisation” after security officials reportedly denied members of
his cost-cutting task force access to restricted areas of the
agency's headquarters in Washington, DC.“Time for it to die,” Musk
wrote on his social media platform X. He also affirmed that
President Donald Trump has 'agreed' USAID should be shut down.
While some may lament its closure as a retreat from global
development, others-Azerbaijan included-view it as a long-overdue
correction to a system that prioritized Washington's interests over
genuine humanitarian aid.
MENAFN03022025000195011045ID1109160787
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.