(MENAFN- Asia Times)
With a resounding victory in the US presidential election, Donald trump can now claim a sweeping mandate to implement his agenda, both foreign and domestic.
Crucially, the result shows you should never bet against self-interest, either for politicians or for American voters prepared to disregard the most flawed of all characters in the hope he will“fix” their problems.
The guardrails that constrained Trump's first term – a hostile Senate, opponents in the Republican Party and a public service devoted to serve the nation rather than an individual – have either been swept away or will likely soon be bent to his will.
The global implications of a confident and unfettered Trump 2.0 will depend very much on what foreign policy path he charts and who he decides to appoint to key positions.
Among those, we then need to watch who is selected to do his bidding and who will replace them when they inevitably fall out of favour. Early lists of potential appointees include:
Marco Rubio and Richard Grenell , who have been mentioned as potential secretary of state
Kash Patel , mooted as CIA director
Mike Pompeo , the former secretary of state and CIA director during Trump's first term in office, who may end up at the Pentagon as defense secretary.
Even Mike Flynn , Trump's first national security adviser, who resigned just 22 days into his tenure after lying about contacts with Russia's ambassador to the US, has been mentioned in discussions about senior roles.
So, too, has the self-styled strategic policy expert Elbridge Colby , a former US Defense Department official.
Trump will demand unswerving loyalty from his appointees while claiming all the credit for their work. But, as he ages, he is also likely to rely heavily on them to take the lead on strategic policy direction.
With that in mind, here are three possible paths a Trump administration might take on the world stage.
1) America First, with compromises
Having trumpeted his credentials as a peacemaker, it is possible Trump returns the US to a position of isolationism and exceptionalism, essentially being a friend and enemy to no one.
That could mean either withdrawing completely from NATO , or making US security assistance so conditional on transatlantic fealty that Europe is essentially captive to his whims.
It could also mean:
drawing down support for US alliances in Asia and the Pacific
demanding ever-higher levels of defense spending from security partners
running a critical eye over any deal that might require the US to commit the lion's share of resources, or reduce its own military capabilities.
Australia, for instance, will be keen to extract assurances of continued White House support for the AUKUS partnership . This involves Australia buying several nuclear-powered submarines in the early 2030s, in addition to technology sharing between the US and United Kingdom.
This deal is almost certain to be scrutinised by the Trump administration, despite strong support from Republicans in the Congress and Senate.
MENAFN08112024000159011032ID1108864522
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.