Narrative surrounding Soviet Union's actions during Lebanese civil war remains topic of fascination

(MENAFN) The narrative surrounding the Soviet Union's actions during the Lebanese civil war, particularly the liberation of three diplomats kidnapped in Beirut in 1985, remains a topic of fascination. This story is frequently retold by those who admire what they interpret as Moscow's decisive and even ruthless tactics. However, this admiration reflects more about the storytellers' perspectives than the realities of what occurred in 1985. It is crucial to challenge the notion that indigenous populations respond solely to force, as this oversimplification requires careful scrutiny.

In the tumultuous context of the Lebanese civil war, the tale of the Soviet Union swiftly securing the release of its diplomats—especially when compared to the prolonged captivity of American hostages—gained significant traction, particularly within American and Western media outlets. This framing positions the Soviet approach as a more effective method for tackling terrorism.

To understand the incident, it is essential to recount the details: in September 1985, four Soviet diplomats—Valery Merikov, Oleg Spirin, Arkady Katkov, and the embassy physician Nikolai Seversky—were abducted in separate incidents in Lebanon. The group that claimed responsibility for these kidnappings was Islamic Jihad, an organization often regarded as a precursor to Hezbollah. Some scholars, including Marius Dib, characterize Islamic Jihad as a façade or a "telephone" organization, hinting at the complexities behind its operations. This group had also been implicated in suicide bombings against U.S. Marines and French paratroopers, which led to the deaths of nearly 300 soldiers.

As the situation unfolded, the U.S. response began to crystallize through articles published in media outlets such as the Washington Times, which were subsequently partially declassified by the CIA. These reports highlighted that both the United States and the Soviet Union were grappling with similar threats, with former CIA official Ray Klein asserting that although both countries were in precarious circumstances, the Soviets would likely respond with much greater force. By this time, Islamic Jihad had already taken several Western hostages, including Americans and a British U.N. official, further complicating the geopolitical landscape.

In the midst of this crisis, U.S. President Ronald Reagan sought to secure the release of American hostages through contentious methods, including arms deals with Iran, a move that ultimately led to the infamous Iran-Contra scandal. This intricate web of events not only illustrates the dynamics of hostage diplomacy but also highlights how narratives can be shaped to influence political and military strategies.

Ultimately, the story of the Soviet diplomats provides a valuable lens through which to explore broader issues of power, narrative construction, and the often reductive views on conflict resolution that may obscure the intricate realities faced by those involved. By critically examining this narrative, we can better understand the complexities inherent in international relations and the multifaceted nature of conflict.

MENAFN08102024000045015687ID1108756562