(MENAFN- Trend News Agency) BAKU, Azerbaijan, February 25. The second
Karabakh war, which ended with Azerbaijan's victory, had
significant geopolitical implications for the South Caucasus that
are accepted by various powers showing their interest in the
region.
The signing of a peace agreement between Azerbaijan and Armenia,
the beginning of the border delimitation and demarcation process,
and the opening of regional communication routes were critical
topics on the post-war agenda. However, no real results were
achieved. In accordance with paragraph 6 of the trilateral
statement signed on November 10, 2020, Azerbaijan has established
conditions for the movement of people and goods on the
Lachin-Khankendi road, which provides the only direct road link
between Armenia and the Armenians living in Karabakh.
However, Armenia has not yet fulfilled the obligation assumed,
according to paragraph 9 of the mentioned statement, which
envisages free transport communication between the western
districts of Azerbaijan and its Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic of
Azerbaijan. Armenia's provocations on the conventional border with
Azerbaijan (widespread use of landmines) has posed a serious risk
to the regional security.
Given the Russia-Ukraine conflict and the resulting energy,
transport, and logistics crisis, the importance of the South
Caucasus for the West is significantly increasing. Precisely in
order to ensure the regional stability and peace, as well as the
security of renewable energy and transport routes for the West, the
Prague talks resulted in the decision to deploy the EU civil
mission on the Azerbaijan-Armenia conventional border for a
two-month term. Even though the mission expired last December, on
January 23, 2023, EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and
Security Policy Josep Borrell announced the deployment of a new EU
civil mission with initial mandate of two years.
Although there had been a consensus regarding the first mission
sent to the conditional Azerbaijan-Armenia border, the decision on
deploying a new mission was made without taking Baku's opinion into
consideration. The Azerbaijani Foreign Ministry stated that the
relevant decision of the Council of Europe on establishing a
monitoring mission in Armenia should not impede the normalization
process between Azerbaijan and Armenia, and should not become a
pretext for Armenia to avoid fulfilling its obligations. It was
also noted that the EU mission's deployment in Armenia should be
ensured considering the legitimate interests of Azerbaijan.
Armenia's invitation of the EU monitoring mission to the area of
responsibility of the Collective Security Treaty Organization
(CSTO) further increases the tension between the West and Russia.
The Russian Foreign Ministry, speaking on this issue, emphasized
that the deployment of EU representatives in the Armenian border
districts may result in a geopolitical regional conflict and
further worsen the existing contradictions. Even if Yerevan is
trying to attribute the reason for the civilian mission's
deployment to the inaction of the CSTO, the real reason is the
Armenian government's shift toward a Western-oriented foreign
policy.
No doubt, each country has the right to make its own decisions
regarding its international relations and foreign affairs. However,
Armenia, which is now seeking closer ties with the West in security
matters, borders on the Islamic Republic of Iran and has become its
de facto strategic ally. Iran, which has always stated that the
emerging issues in the South Caucasus should be resolved by the
countries of the region and considered the involvement of
third-party forces its“red line”, remains silent against the
events taking place in Armenia. The“3+3” cooperation format (the
three South Caucasus countries of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia
plus their three big neighbors, namely Russia, Türkiye and Iran),
included in the regional agenda after the second Karabakh war, was
supported by Tehran.
According to the statement of the Iranian Ministry of Foreign
Affairs, during the first phone conversation between the
Azerbaijani and Iranian foreign ministers (October 16, 2022), right
after the leaders' meeting in Prague, Minister Hossein
Amir-Abdollahian said that the presence of foreign forces in the
Caucasus is of concern to the regional countries and Iran opposes
the deployment of any foreign forces there.
'Iran stands against the presence of foreign forces in the
region. It's necessary to use intra-regional opportunities,
including the“3+3” mechanism, and the countries of the region
should solve regional problems themselves,' said Amir-Abdollahian
during the meeting with Armenian PM Nikol Pashinyan in October of
2022.
Tehran has repeatedly stated that the interference of external
forces with the region doesn't correspond to its strategic
interests. However, it was not Azerbaijan but Armenia that invited
the EU civil mission to the region, and there has been no negative
reaction from the Iranian government to either the EU or Armenia,
from the announcement of the decision.
The official website of the Council of the Europe provides
information on the mission in Armenia in the decision of January
23, 2023 No. 2023/162. The document noted that the EU mission in
Armenia was being established within the Common Security and
Defense Policy. Furthermore, two other highlighted points in the
document – the activities to be carried out by the mission and the
possible involvement of third countries in the process – remain
unclear to the public. According to the document, the mission's
mandate is to conduct regular patrols to obtain information on the
security status of these areas, as well as collect and report daily
data to the center.
However, it's wrong to expect that this type of routine activity
will be limited only to the Azerbaijan-Armenia border. It's
possible that the two-year EU monitoring mission will also monitor
the 'actions' of Azerbaijan's southern neighbor across the
Armenia-Iran border and deliver intelligence information to
Brussels. Iran's destructive intervention in the Ukraine-Russia
conflict, the termination of discussions on the Iranian nuclear
program (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action), the smuggling of
drugs to Europe through Armenia and other activities force the
civilian mission to focus on Iran.
Paragraph 9 of the document 'On the EU Mission in Armenia' about
the involvement of third countries in the mission's activities
stated that third states were allowed partake in the mission,
provided that they pay the expenses of the seconded by them
personnel, including salaries, all-risk insurance, daily expenses,
etc., as well as don't prejudice to the EU's autonomy in making
decisions and its single institutional framework.
Quoting Paragraph 6:“If the required functions cannot be
carried out by personnel seconded by Member States, international
and local staff may be hired by the mission under contract.'
Obviously, the European Union's monitoring mission, which has
begun to operate in Armenia, will include intelligence officers of
Western states under the guise of 'representatives of third
countries' who have acted in the past or are currently operating.
It's also clear that the main activity of these forces will be to
obtain information about Iran, located in areas bordering with this
country. Considering that third countries mean states located
outside the European continent and their citizens, the whole
picture must have been obvious to everyone.
The other day, the official website of the Council of the Europe
posted information on the launch of the new EU civil mission in
Armenia. Following the information, the civilian European Union
Mission in Armenia (EUMA) will include 100 members, with nearly 50
unarmed observers. Markus Ritter, who held high positions in the
missions of Germany, the EU, including the UN in Georgia, Kosovo,
South Sudan, Iraq and Afghanistan, was appointed head of the
mission. It has recently become known that France and Germany would
be represented in a civilian mission.
It's surprising that Tehran, which has been accusing Azerbaijan,
without any evidence, of gathering 'Zionists', 'Takfiri
terrorists', and other forces on the border with the Islamic
Republic, for some reason remains silent against latest incidents
occurring on its own borders.