Netanyahu's Assassinations A Forever War Gamble

Latest stories

Biden's to blame for US inflation

US to tighten China chip squeeze with old Cold War rule

Netanyahu risking regional war for his own political survival

These were episodes perhaps best exemplified by Iran's launch , in April, of 120 ballistic missiles, 30 cruise missiles and 170 drones. Tehran took care to notify Israeli allies in advance. As a result almost all of the munitions were intercepted. Those that landed were on a base in a sparsely populated area.

But Israel's leadership, political and military, was waiting. And when Hezbollah made the serious mistake of killing youngsters playing football, the plan was rolled out and Haniyeh was eliminated.

Not only did they get rid of one of Hamas's most important officials – and, significantly, the man involved in negotiations for a ceasefire in Gaza – they embarrassed Iran's regime.

Tehran to 'play the victim'?

This was supposed to be the week when the supreme leader would regain legitimacy amid a protracted economic crisis, social unrest, and historically low voter turnout.

Having stage-managed the surprise presidential victory of a“reformist”, the inauguration of Pezeshkian was designed to highlight a resurgent Iran with scores of international leaders paying tribute.

But now the regime is having to preside over Haniyeh's funeral and the exposure of its weakness.

The supreme leader blustered that it was “Iran's duty” to deliver“harsh punishment” . But less than two hours later, Iran's first vice-president, Mohammad Reza Aref , undid the threat, with a statement on Iran's official state media channel that there would be no Iranian escalation of conflict across the region.

All of which makes sense for Tehran. In a direct confrontation, including a ground war, Israel would have far more firepower than Hezbollah. It could finally break Lebanon, which is an economic basket case and socially fragile.

So Iran's likely course of action is to play the victim, joining the even greater victim of the Gazan people after Israel's ten months of mass killings. That political and diplomatic approach would seek to peel off international support for the Israelis and to give the Iranians leverage with Arab and Muslim countries.

Meanwhile in Israel and Gaza

Israel's political and military assessment would have been accompanied by a degree of personal calculus by the prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu. After ten months of conflict in Gaza, Netanyahu was in deep trouble.

He was not close to the return of around 120 hostages, alive or dead. He could not provide the fulfillment of his pledge to“destroy” the Gazan faction. Instead, Israeli troops appeared to be stuck in perpetual operations in full view of a mainly disapproving world.

The country is being riven. Hard-right ministers are demanding he expand the Israel Defense Forces assaults and“cleansing” of Gaza. Their supporters recently broke into one military base where IDS troops were being held on charges of abusing prisoners. Some entered the Israel Defense Forces military court where the cases were being held.

At the same time, anti-war protests are building among the civilian population . So are the rallies around the families of hostages, as they demand a resolution of the situation of their loved ones.

One possible route out of this mess for Netanyahu is the acceptance of the international plan , heralded by the US, for a three-phase settlement leading to a ceasefire. But to do so would expose the prime minister to the risk of early elections and a resumption of his prosecution over bribery charges.