(MENAFN- AzerNews)
Qabil Ashirov read more The Armenian authorities have gained a very popular image for
their frivolous behavior and untrustworthiness. For example, every
time the prime Minister in Yerevan returns to his office after
meetings, there is either commotion in his country or armed
provocations are started against neighboring Azerbaijan. The
problem is that although Pashinyan leaves political meetings with
positive promises every time, the result is completely
different.
Therefore, the word of this bearded guy is not valued either in his
country or abroad.
So, the last meeting in Brussels did not differ in this case as
well. Pashinyan delivered speeches about mutually recognizing
territorial integrity. Later shoutout happened from Zod settlement
of Basarkecher region in Azerbaijan's Army direction.
Brussels held a meeting on May 14, and Charles Michel made a
speech and declared that Armenia recognizes Azerbaijani territorial
integrity. Following Charles Michel's speech Armenian political
parties including Dashnaksutyun and the so-called "Artsakh
republic" denounced the Brussels meeting. Even the so-called
“foreign minister of artsakh republic” who begged assistance from
international organizations and foreign countries stated going
beyond the limits that“Representatives of individual countries and
international organizations have no right to decide the fate of the
people of artsakh.”
Taking into account the above-mentioned, one has no other option
but to think that Pashinyan fears something or somebody or this guy
is making a clandestine cooperation with this illegal group of
separatists. In a comment on the issue for Azernews , the political analyst Zardusht Alizade
noted that it is related to the internal situation of Armenia. He
emphasized that the internal political situation in the country is
very tense and the influence of external forces is very great.
“For 150 years, the Armenians had lived with some fabrications
which seriously infected the common point of view. After the
humiliating defeat in the 44-day war, it is very painful for them
to suddenly leave this dream in such a short period of time.
Obviously, any political leader in Armenia who states the truth,
he would be assassined over high treason or just a coup would be
organised against him. Pashinyan always remembers this and tries to
be very careful. He gradually tries to explain the reality to the
people and constantly negotiates with his opponents. The PM gives
his suggestions and asks them for their suggestions. Opponents of
Pashinyan voice their proposals, and over a period of time, society
also understands that the proposals they voice are not real
proposals. It is a dream,” he said.
Alizade pointed out that at present, a mixed ideology is
currently forming in Armenia. According to him, some groups are
suggested to lean towards Iran or France, some other are suggested
that they should unite and form a people's army, that every man and
every woman should take a machine gun, and so on. And part of the
society comprehends that there is no one who says the truth except
Pashinyan.
“Despite the fact that Pashinyan was defeated in the war, there
is no politician stronger than him in Armenian society. In the last
poll, his popularity dropped to 14 percent. Earlier, its popularity
was 70 percent. However, his rival Robert Kocheryan's rating was
just 2 percent,” Alizade said.
As for the issue that Pashinyan turns back on his words, the
analyst commented that he could not say anything about this just
now, because Pashinyan had not made any comments after his return.
However, he emphasized that this time it will be hard for the
separatist groups to oppose, because the territory of both states
were expressed in numbers.
The expert also touched on the statement of the so-called
“artsakh republic” about Charles Michels' speech and said that
Sergei Gazaryan (the FM of the so-called republic) is very young
and he graduated from the Moscow State University.
“He considers himself well-educated and he thinks that he utters
logically. I underline again that he thinks so, but actually he is
still in illusions. Speaking logically in an imaginary world, he
explains that no state can dictate to any independent state.
However, he even knows the fiction of 'artsakh' is not recognized
in the world except a handful of people in Azerbaijan's territory.
Azerbaijan has decided the fate of Karabakh, and now it is time for
Armenian community in Karabakh to decide their own fate and make
efforts to talk with the government of Azerbaijan. They should
negotiate with the Azerbaijani government and determine their
future within Azerbaijan with the participation of the Western
community, but not the Western leaders."
---