(MENAFN- AzerNews)
By Orkhan Amashov
The post-2020 architecture of the South Caucasus has, at its
premise, the geopolitical ramifications emanating from Azerbaijan's
decisive victory in the Second Karabakh War. The Shusha
Declaration, signed on 15 June 2021 and ratified by both countries
in February 2022, upgraded the already strong ties between Baku and
Ankara into the domain of alliance. This is now a critical element
within the whole security construct that is yet to reach its
'cementitious' solidity.
Nonetheless, fundamental linchpins are there. The essence of the
Shusha Declaration bespeaks the transformation of the 'emotional
vortex' engendered by ethno-linguistic ties between the two
countries into a formal legal framework and a more expressive form
of realpolitik.
As for any comprehensive document of this kind, it consolidates
the pre-existing arrangements, solidifying them into an enhanced
mode. Neil Watson, for instance, a British journalist who has
written extensively on Azerbaijan over the past decade and is
currently on a trip to liberated Aghdam, is of the opinion that the
Shusha Declaration“provides an unprecedented level of support and
security guarantees” for Baku, thereby entitling Turkey to a
greater role in the region and beyond.
Security and defence
In fact, the military-defence dimension of these enhanced
relations looms larger than ever. In each key component that made
the Azerbaijani military triumph possible in 2020, there is an
indubitable Turkish trace. The systemic use of unmanned drone
systems, network-centric operational hardware, and informational
superiority was integral to Baku's victory. Armenia, on the other
hand, was prioritising Soviet-Russian doctrines, relying on its
firepower surmounting echeloned defences.
In addition, Ankara's political-diplomatic support for Baku
neutralised the intervention of a third party. In the same spirit,
Azerbaijan's post-2020 military doctrine is heavily influenced by
that which was achieved during the recent war. In this vein, the
reconstruction of the Azerbaijani Armed Forces along the lines of
the Turkish model, setting in motion the joint military industry
and furnishing the commando units that aim to ensure security in
the liberated territories are a continuation of the same
pattern.
The kaleidoscope of the South Caucasus is still in the making
and its fluid content has yet to acquire a crystallised shape.
Irish historian Dr Patrick Walsh, who kindly shared his views on
the subject, the Shusha Declaration has provided an extra layer of
security for Azerbaijan, which it did not possess previously.
“It will certainly make neighbouring countries and regional
powers think twice before violating the territorial integrity of
Azerbaijan,” stated Dr Walsh. To this effect, both Armenia or any
other actor desirous of backing Yerevan are effectively
neutralised.
The alliance with Azerbaijan enables Turkey to project greater
power both westwards and eastwards. As a transit country, pivotal
to the export of Azerbaijani energy through the Trans-Anatolian
Pipeline (TANAP) segment of the Southern Gas Corridor (SGC) to
Europe, Ankara is critical to the EU market.
Simultaneously, via Azerbaijan, it is evident that Turkey gains
critical access to the Caspian Basin and Central Asia, empowering
the Organisation of Turkic States. Many observers agree that,
without the Baku-Ankara axis, the whole concept of a wider Turkic
unity is neither attractive nor probable.
Geopolitical balance
It has long been understood in Baku that the augmentation of
Azerbaijan's international clout necessitates strong ties with all
three South Caucasus neighbours. The Moscow Declaration, signed on
22 February, which is yet to be ratified, fits into the grand
scheme of the foreign policy design pursued by Baku.
The two documents in question, despite being similar in many
ways, are not quite identical. In fact, the Shusha Declaration is
more of a framework, envisaging a deeper form of integration,
whereas the Moscow document is about mutual obligations.
In many ways, Azerbaijan has managed to re-establish its ties
with both Ankara and Moscow in such a way that the common interests
of the two heavyweights largely form a certain delicate balance,
giving rise to fertile ground for Baku to entrench its place as a
player punching above its weight. Patrick Walsh believes that,
since Russia needs for its geopolitical gains to maintain good
relations with Ankara, the likelihood of any crisis between the two
nations adversely affecting Baku is diminished.
Moscow views post-Soviet geography as a zone of direct interest,
where it can, as the Ukrainian crisis proves, act decisively, in an
interventionist manner. Turkey's ties with Azerbaijan form one of
the reasons why the situation is different from Azerbaijan. In
addition to Baku's“treading-a-tightrope' policy in relation to its
northern neighbour, the Turkish factor is of great
significance.
Dr Walsh, for instance, is of the opinion that Ankara provides a
two-layer shield:“If Russia chooses to act militarily against
Azerbaijan in a future dispute, it would have two powerful
restraining forces against such a decision: the possibility of a
Turkish military response and the loss of Azerbaijan to NATO and
the West.”
In the same vein, Azerbaijan is careful to maintain a healthy
equilibrium with Iran. Tehran is yet to come to terms with the
post-2020 geopolitics of the region, and its concerns over the
Zangazur project remain palpable.
The Memorandum of Understanding signed with Baku in March 2022,
envisaging a communications route connecting the Eastern Zangazur
region of Azerbaijan with its Nakhchivan exclave via Iranian
territory, was a calculated move that tied Iran to the new
geopolitical map of the region, somewhat placating its
disaffectedness.
As stated at the outset, the whole geopolitical landscape of the
region is far from being a finalised domain wherein all is firmly
entrenched.
In this vein, the Shusha Declaration is not the last word in
Azerbaijani-Turkish relations, nor the ultimate apex beyond which
no profusion could be contemplated, but a new point of departure
from which an ever-closer union between the two Turkic nations is
yet to emerge.
---
Follow us on Twitter @AzerNewsAz
MENAFN15062022000195011045ID1104377881
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.