Who Owns Mumbai? BMC Polls Turn Into A Battle Over Demography And Vote Banks

As Mumbai heads toward the high-stakes 2026 Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections, India's financial capital finds itself gripped by a charged political debate that goes far beyond potholes, water supply and civic services. At its core lies a deeper anxiety - whether electoral calculations are beginning to shape the city's demography, neighbourhoods and identity more than long-term urban planning.

From slum regularisation to welfare schemes, from migration patterns to symbolism in civic leadership, Mumbai's politics has entered a phase where development, identity and vote-bank strategies are increasingly intertwined.

Allegations of Demographic Engineering

Opposition leaders and political analysts have raised serious allegations against the Mahavikas Aghadi (MVA), claiming that several policy decisions during its tenure were aimed less at neutral governance and more at reshaping electoral arithmetic across Mumbai's municipal wards.

Decisions linked to slum rehabilitation, welfare outreach and civic appointments, critics argue, were designed to secure durable political influence over BMC budgets and ward-level power. According to them, once demographic balances shift within a ward, reversing their impact becomes nearly impossible, locking future administrations into inherited electoral realities.

The 'Two-Pronged' Vote-Bank Strategy

Political analysts describe what they call a“two-pronged” electoral strategy playing out not just in Mumbai but across Maharashtra.

The first allegedly fragments Hindu voters along caste, linguistic and regional lines, with reservation demands and regional identity debates projected as social justice issues. Critics, however, argue that these narratives keep Hindu communities divided.

The second, they claim, focuses on consolidating Muslim voters through symbolic outreach, assurances and targeted benefits. According to opponents, this encourages bloc voting by framing elections around narratives of insecurity and selective appeasement.

Together, critics believe, this strategy could shape outcomes across multiple urban constituencies over successive election cycles.

Marathi Identity and the Politics of Migration

Few issues cut as deeply in Mumbai as the question of Marathi identity. Once central to the city's political discourse, it has re-emerged amid accusations that the Uddhav Balasaheb Thackeray (UBT) faction has sidelined Marathi residents in pursuit of broader electoral gains.

Rising rents and soaring property prices have already forced many middle-class Marathi families to relocate to Thane, Kalyan, Dombivli and Virar. Activists argue that this outward migration has left gaps within the city - gaps that critics allege are being filled through“soft policing” and easier access to identity documents for illegal migrants, including Bangladeshi and Rohingya Muslims.

Opponents warn that once illegal settlers obtain ration cards or Aadhaar documents, the issue transcends civic politics and enters the realm of national security.

Illegal Settlements and the Planning Paradox

The debate over unauthorised settlements has intensified around areas such as Behrampada, Malvani and Kurla, where illegal construction has continued for years. During the MVA's tenure, opposition parties repeatedly alleged that these settlements were being nudged toward legalisation under the guise of slum rehabilitation and regularisation drives.

Urban planners caution that legalising unauthorised colonies without assessing infrastructure capacity, safety and sustainability can permanently alter neighbourhood dynamics. Critics argue that once such areas are regularised, they often evolve into reliable vote banks for the parties backing the move.

Symbolism, Mayoral Politics and Community Signals

Symbolism has emerged as another flashpoint. The possibility of appointing a Muslim mayor in Mumbai has sparked sharp political reactions. Supporters describe it as inclusive and reflective of the city's diversity, while opponents view it as part of a calculated appeasement strategy ahead of civic polls.

Past controversies from the MVA period - including the beautification of Yakub Memon's grave and public Azaan-related events - continue to fuel criticism. Opponents argue these actions send problematic signals in a city scarred by repeated terror attacks and risk deepening communal mistrust.

Sena (UBT)-MNS: Welfare Pitch with a Marathi Core

Against this backdrop, the Shiv Sena (UBT) and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) recently unveiled a joint manifesto titled“Vachan Nama, Shabd Thackerencha”, released at Shiv Sena Bhawan - a venue MNS chief Raj Thackeray returned to after nearly two decades.

The cover features cousins Uddhav and Raj Thackeray alongside Shiv Sena founder Balasaheb Thackeray.

Key promises include a Rs 1,500 monthly“Swabhiman Nidhi” for domestic helps and women from the Koli fishing community, 100 units of free electricity, and property tax waiver for homes up to 700 sq ft. The alliance also promised Rs 10 meals under a subsidised food scheme, free power through BEST, lower bus fares, interest-free loans for gig workers, and financial aid for youth entrepreneurship.

The manifesto asserts that“Mumbai's land will only be used to house Mumbaikars” and promises affordable housing for BMC, government, BEST employees and mill workers. It also commits to five new medical colleges, a super-speciality cancer hospital, expanded BMC schools up to Class 12, creches for working parents, and improved civic amenities including pet parks and clinics.

Mahayuti's Sharp Counter: 'Apachan Nama'

The BJP-led Mahayuti alliance reacted swiftly, dismissing the Sena (UBT)-MNS document as an“apachan nama”.

State minister Ashish Shelar said,“Listening to such assurances causes indigestion among people. Hence, this is not a 'vachan nama' (promise document) but an 'apachan nama' (indigestion note).”

Revenue minister Chandrashekhar Bawankule termed it a“farce” of“hollow promises”, while Rahul Shewale of the rival Shiv Sena said the manifesto bears the“imprint of Bombay Scottish”, referring to Aaditya Thackeray and Amit Thackeray.

Shewale also claimed the document avoids words like Hindu, Hindutva and Hinduhriday Samrat, alleging appeasement.“The manifesto has a photograph of Shiv Sena founder Bal Thackeray, but his soul is missing from it,” he said.

Congress and NCP: Inclusivity and Infrastructure

The Congress manifesto focused on air quality improvement, universal health cards for free medicines, affordable housing, transparent redevelopment and better civic services. It promised two new multi-speciality hospitals, upgraded schools, stronger public transport and environmental safeguards, while allocating five percent of the BMC budget each for SC and ST welfare.

The NCP's vision, articulated as“Aapli Mumbai, Sarvansathi Mumbai”, promised 500 km of new roads, AI-based traffic management, one lakh affordable homes, modernised healthcare, free water for old chawls and slums, expanded Metro networks and climate resilience measures.

A City at a Defining Moment

Political commentators describe Mumbai's present moment as a“double game” - one where Hindu society remains fragmented over identity debates, while minority votes are consolidated through symbolic gestures and selective policies.

As the race for the BMC and the mayor's post intensifies, many residents fear that unchecked vote-bank politics - through illegal migration, document misuse and selective regularisation - could permanently alter the city's character.

With elections looming, Mumbai stands at a turning point, torn between competing visions of development, identity and governance. The outcome may not just decide who runs Asia's richest civic body, but what kind of city Mumbai ultimately becomes.

MENAFN09012026007385015968ID1110577228