
Trump Officials Leak Yemen Attack Plans In Signal Chat Breach
In a controversial report by Jeffrey Goldberg, Editor-in-Chief of The Atlantic, a journalist accidentally gained access to a sensitive communication channel on the Signal messaging app. The channel contained discussions among senior officials of the Trump administration about confidential matters.
Goldberg revealed that the journalist was mistakenly added to a group involving members of Trump's cabinet and National Security Team. The group was discussing strategic and military issues, exposing significant flaws in the management of classified information during Trump's presidency.
The report disclosed that members of the group discussed potential attacks on Houthi positions in Yemen, including timing, execution, and operational goals. It was revealed that many senior officials, including the Vice President, were opposed to the attack.
The Signal group included key Trump administration officials such as National Security Advisor Mike Walz, Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegst, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Their involvement in the communication channel underscored the high level of the breach.
Among the leaked chats, a message from the Vice President cautioned about the economic repercussions of a strike on Yemen. He recommended a one-month delay to ensure proper messaging to Europe and assess economic implications.
In contrast, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegst strongly supported a swift attack on the Houthi positions, stating that waiting would change nothing, and immediate action was necessary to ensure military success.
The report sparked widespread reactions, with critics pointing to it as evidence of disorder and lax security standards within the Trump administration. Political analysts called for further investigations into the structural weaknesses in managing sensitive information.
In its first response, the White House stated that the reported messages appeared valid and were being investigated. They emphasized that the coordination in these communications was vital for policy-making and the success of military operations against the Houthis.
Hours after the leak, President Donald Trump denied any knowledge of the confidential information being exposed. He dismissed The Atlantic as a failing magazine and claimed he was unaware of the details, further distancing himself from the incident.
The incident sheds light on significant security lapses within the Trump administration, raising concerns about the handling of classified information. These revelations call for a deeper examination into the systems and protocols that govern the protection of sensitive communications within the U.S. government.
ShareFacebook Twitter WhatsApp Email Print Telegram
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Comments
No comment