Supreme Court Refuses To Stay Patna HC Order Striking Down 65% Reservation In Bihar


(MENAFN- AsiaNet News) The Supreme Court on Monday refused to stay Patna High Court order that set aside the increase in reservation for Backward Classes, SC & ST from 50 per cent to 65 per cent in public employment and admission to educational institutions.
A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and justices J B Pardiwla and Manoj Misra, however, agreed to hear at least 10 petitions of the Bihar government against the Patna HC verdict.
The petitions will be considered in September, the highest court announced, granting leave for appeal without even notifying the parties to the pleas.

Senior attorney Shyam Divan pleaded with the judge to suspend the HC ruling while representing the state administration.
He referred to a similar case of Chhattisgarh and said that the top court had then stayed the order of the high court.
The panel led by Chief Justice India declared, "We will list the matter, but we will not grant any stay (on the HC verdict)".

The state's bicameral legislature approved the revisions overwhelmingly in November of last year. The high court determined in its June 20 ruling that they were "ultra vires" of the Constitution, "bad in law," and "violative of the equality clause."
The high court had made it clear that it saw“no extenuating circumstance enabling the state to breach” the 50% cap on reservations laid down by the Supreme Court in the Indra Sawhney case.

Notably, in November 2023, the Reservation Amendment Bill was enacted by the Bihar Assembly. Nitish Kumar was not present when the law was passed by the state legislature. 20 percent went to Scheduled Castes, two percent went to Scheduled Tribes, forty-three percent went to Other Backward Classes, and very backward classes received the revised reserve quota.
In contrast to the Supreme Court's 50% ceiling, the reserve was increased to 75% when the 10% quota for the Economic Weaker Section was added.

MENAFN29072024007385015968ID1108492906


AsiaNet News

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.