Xenophobia in South Africa: how family members influenced Nigerians to flee or stay

(MENAFN- The Conversation)

In early September 2019, xenophobic attacks escalated dramatically in two large South African cities, Johannesburg and Pretoria, as well as adjoining areas.

Businesses belonging to African immigrants were looted, burned and destroyed. People were assaulted. Between January and September 2019 South Africa recorded 68 attacks and 18 people died. More than 147 shops were looted . Immigrants in South Africa commonly hail from countries like Zimbabwe, Nigeria, Angola, Somalia and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

During the 2019 attacks Nigerians – especially those who had family members in South Africa – pressured the government to evacuate Nigerian migrants.

In a study I set out to establish to what extent these relatives contributed to Nigerian migrants' decision to return. And what these return strategies revealed about how important families are to taking migration decisions.

My study involved online interviews with Nigerian immigrants in South Africa who stayed put, as well as six people based in Nigeria with transnational family members in South Africa.

This was supplemented with analysis of secondary interviews with returnees conducted by three reporters from Nigeria's Vanguard , Punch , Nigerian Tribune and the Nation newspapers. The interviews were conducted at Murtala Muhammed International Airport as people returned home on state-provided aeroplanes.

The limitations of the data obtained through these sources included lacking firsthand contact with the returnees. In addition, the sample size was too small to make generalisations.

Nonetheless, my study was able to provide insights into the complex role that families play in these return decisions. The findings entrench the central role of family in decisions taken by migrants, whether they chose to stay put in South Africa or to return home.

Those migrants who accepted the Nigerian government's offer of help to return home fell into three categories.

The first were people who had suffered direct losses to their businesses and livelihoods. Second, there were those who feared they might become victims. Third, those who were stranded in South Africa even before the xenophobic violence.

Read more: Why young Nigerians risk illegal migration to find their 'Eldorado'

The strategies of return showed how the family was pivotal in reaching decisions of 'who', 'how', and 'when' to return.

In some instances affected Nigerian families in South Africa decided to reduce potential victimisation by sending their children to their families in Nigeria while the father and mother remained in South Africa. A 12-year female returnee from Ogun State expressed this as follows:

Chinasa, a 33 years old Nigerian, lived in Pretoria and returned with her child but her husband stayed in South Africa temporarily. She said:

But some families prevented family members returning. In some cases this involved husbands refusing to give their wives their approval to flee South Africa. Or refusing to give permission for children to return. One respondent explained:

Many Nigerians decided to remain in South Africa. This decision was affected by a myriad of factors including investments in the country and marriage. As one migrant stated:

Beyond these two factors, family care responsibilities – needing to earn money in South Africa to support family – prevented many from deciding to return even if they wished to.

The findings underscore the importance of family in the decisions that migrants make. In some instances families facilitated the decision to return. In others they thwarted people who wanted to return home.

The study shows the important role family plays in influencing both migration intentions and actual practices. It also explained how predetermined aspirations of both migrants and their families contribute to their understanding of social realities and even xenophobic violence.

MENAFN16032022000199003603ID1103861448