403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
Trade On Pause?: Brazil Seeks 90 Days To Cool U.S. Import Duties
(MENAFN- The Rio Times) Brazil's foreign minister Mauro Vieira and U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio meet in Washington to negotiate the recent tariff surge.
The agenda was set during a brief conversation on Wednesday the 12th at the G7 gathering in Canada, which brought together many of the world's largest economies.
At the center of the talks is a practical idea: Brazil formally proposed on November 4 a time-limited freeze-about 90 days-on the elevated duties now hitting Brazilian exports.
The logic is straightforward: it's hard to bargain with new charges landing mid-shipment. A standstill would pause the pain while both sides work the details.
This session is the most concrete step since last month, when Presidents Lula and Trump met in Malaysia and told their teams to“advance.”
Brazil, U.S. seek tariff truce built on clear rules
Since then, aides have held technical discussions; today's encounter is meant to turn that momentum into something businesses can plan around. The ask from industry is not complicated: stable rules, a calendar, and clarity on which products are in or out.
Why it matters to readers abroad: tariffs are border taxes. When they jump without warning, importers can't price contracts, exporters can't size production, and shipping plans become guesswork.
That uncertainty acts like a hidden tax on families and small firms. A short freeze would not end disputes over steel, machinery, footwear, pulp, or food products-but it would let companies quote, hedge, and hire with fewer surprises.
The story behind the story is about discipline versus drift. Brasília wants to prove it can secure breathing room for its producers without bluff or bluster.
Washington wants to defend strategic sectors while keeping supply chains reliable and inflation pressures contained. A rules-first pause would signal that both governments prefer clear commitments over headline skirmishes.
What to watch next: whether the United States accepts the 90-day standstill; any early carve-outs for sensitive items; a verification mechanism and start date; and a timeline with checkpoints so talks don't wander.
If progress stalls, expect leaders to step back in quickly-the cost of uncertainty rises with every week.
The agenda was set during a brief conversation on Wednesday the 12th at the G7 gathering in Canada, which brought together many of the world's largest economies.
At the center of the talks is a practical idea: Brazil formally proposed on November 4 a time-limited freeze-about 90 days-on the elevated duties now hitting Brazilian exports.
The logic is straightforward: it's hard to bargain with new charges landing mid-shipment. A standstill would pause the pain while both sides work the details.
This session is the most concrete step since last month, when Presidents Lula and Trump met in Malaysia and told their teams to“advance.”
Brazil, U.S. seek tariff truce built on clear rules
Since then, aides have held technical discussions; today's encounter is meant to turn that momentum into something businesses can plan around. The ask from industry is not complicated: stable rules, a calendar, and clarity on which products are in or out.
Why it matters to readers abroad: tariffs are border taxes. When they jump without warning, importers can't price contracts, exporters can't size production, and shipping plans become guesswork.
That uncertainty acts like a hidden tax on families and small firms. A short freeze would not end disputes over steel, machinery, footwear, pulp, or food products-but it would let companies quote, hedge, and hire with fewer surprises.
The story behind the story is about discipline versus drift. Brasília wants to prove it can secure breathing room for its producers without bluff or bluster.
Washington wants to defend strategic sectors while keeping supply chains reliable and inflation pressures contained. A rules-first pause would signal that both governments prefer clear commitments over headline skirmishes.
What to watch next: whether the United States accepts the 90-day standstill; any early carve-outs for sensitive items; a verification mechanism and start date; and a timeline with checkpoints so talks don't wander.
If progress stalls, expect leaders to step back in quickly-the cost of uncertainty rises with every week.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research
More Story
Comments
No comment