UK Foreign Policy: The Top Five Priorities For 2025

(MENAFN- The Conversation) The UK's new government has now had six months to settle in to office. And by the general standards of new governments, Keir Starmer's was well prepared in terms of foreign policy. Once in office, the government hit the ground running. Defence secretary John Healey visited Ukraine within 48 hours of entering office .

But 2025 is set to be a tumultuous one. So following this strong start, there are five foreign policy priorities for the UK in 2025.

We can expect to see Starmer's government continue to emphasise its commitment to Ukraine. So far, the UK has provided almost £13 billion in aid and another £3 billion is committed for 2025. This includes both military equipment, training and non-military support.

However, over two years into the conflict, there is increasing talk of what an end to the war may look like. After the US president-elect Donald Trump implied that he would effectively cut Ukraine out of negotiations , the UK will want to ensure that any peace talks include Ukraine. Historically, the UK has served as the bridge between the US and Europe, and the government will not want to relinquish such a role if they can help it.

Since Boris Johnson's premiership, the UK has maintained a close relationship with the Ukrainian leadership. The government may use this and the historically close relationship with the US to help influence the format of negotiations.

Starmer's government has been significantly less clear about its intent in relation to the Middle East. The changing picture in the region has made this even harder. The end to the war in Syria in the final weeks of 2024 caught many by surprise, and the UK will want to follow the international community in its approach to the new regime in Damascus. Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), the group in charge of the alliance that overthrew the Assad regime, is still deemed a terrorist organisation in the UK. A decision on whether to change this classification will be needed before the UK can decide if it will work with the new Syrian leaders.

Meanwhile, international condemnation of Israel's actions in Gaza is growing. Washington may continue to support Benjamin Netanyahu – and US support is crucial to prevent international opposition from restricting Israel's ability to act as they wish in Gaza. That leaves the UK little room to manoeuvre. However, the incoming Trump administration may equally be just as distracted by issues at home. If US support for Israel is reduced, this may increase the possibility of international pressure on Netanyahu leading to negotiations for peace or at least a longer-term ceasefire.

Given the salience of Gaza for Labour voters, foreign secretary David Lammy will likely want to maintain pressure on Tel Aviv to seek a peaceful resolution. The UK revoked 30 of 350 licenses for the sale of arms to Israel in 2024, as they may be used to commit “a serious violation of international humanitarian law” . To increase pressure, the UK may seek to further restrict arms sales. However, remaining contracts continue to provide crucial parts for the Israeli military campaign in Gaza, particularly parts for F-35 fighter jets . UK arms sales to Israel are also estimated to be worth nearly half a billion pounds, meaning the cost to the UK economy if more licences are revoked would not be insignificant.

Initial attempts to reset UK-EU relations following the July election had only limited success due to the summer break in Brussels. However, since then, Starmer has met Commission president Ursula von der Leyen. The UK has signalled an intent to build on previous deals by looking to appoint another negotiator and by establishing yearly summits with the EU. The UK has also set out negotiation points for mutual benefit such as security (both counter-terrorism and confronting Russian aggression), and on easing trade barriers in key trade areas.

While European leaders will have their own issues to confront domestically in 2025, the change in tone from the UK government towards the EU is good groundwork for potential deals this year.

Trump's re-election is also significant here. His past comments on European allies and disinterest in international cooperation mean that Europe may need to develop plans to deal with the US being less present as a partner on international challenges such as the Ukraine conflict, international trade deals and climate change. For the UK, a more isolationist US could increase the need for other partnerships, as was the case during his last presidency. Europe is the most obvious candidate.

Trump's condemnation of Nato may also increase the need for European Nato members to take a leadership role within the alliance. The UK has played this role in the past, although typically this was in support of the US.

Trump's election victory means that the UK's“special relationship” with Washington will look very different than it would have if Kamala Harris had won. Prior to the UK election, Labour figures put in significant effort to build relations with the Republicans. But Lammy has fiercely criticised Trump in the past and a controversy over Labour volunteers helping the Harris campaign appears to have left Trump especially hostile to the Labour government again now.

Trump is, of course, unpredictable, especially on foreign policy, so we cannot rule out the possibility of a reinvigorated special relationship. Nevertheless, Trump's isolationism and proposed tariffs on imports to the US mean the UK will still need to develop policies to help mitigate decisions coming out of Washington in 2025.

For any government, foreign policy is an important signal of intentions to both allies and opponents. Lammy has set out “progressive realism” as his approach. However, apart from the Chagos Islands deal with Mauritius, there has been little indication of how this approach will manifest in practice. In 2025, Lammy will need to ensure that“progressive realism” doesn't become tarred with the same brush as Boris Johnson's“Global Britain” approach – he can't allow it to become an empty term.

With the conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza and Syria all at different stages, and the return of the “disruptor-in-chief” to the White House, world politics in 2025 looks like it will continue to be unpredictable. This unpredictability makes the setting of priorities even more important.

MENAFN03012025000199003603ID1109052490