Tech giants face Ohio's social media law demanding parental consent for children

(MENAFN) A consortium representing prominent tech entities such as TikTok, Snapchat, Meta, and other significant tech firms initiated a legal challenge against the state of Ohio on Friday, contesting a forthcoming law mandating parental consent for children to access social media platforms. This legislation, embedded within an USD86.1 billion state budget bill endorsed by Republican Governor Mike DeWine in July, is slated to be enacted on January 15th. Advocates within the administration, including Republican Lt. Gov. Jon Husted, championed the measure as a proactive step to safeguard children's mental well-being, emphasizing concerns that social media platforms are "intentionally addictive" and potentially detrimental to younger users.

The NetChoice trade group promptly filed a lawsuit against Ohio's GOP Attorney General, Dave Yost, lodging its grievances in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. The primary objective of this legal action is to thwart the enforcement of the impending law, asserting that its provisions infringe upon constitutional rights by imposing constraints on free speech while concurrently exhibiting vagueness and overreach. Notably, the contested legislation mandates that social media platforms procure parental authorization for individuals under the age of 16 seeking to create accounts on various social media and gaming applications. Additionally, these platforms are obligated to furnish parents with explicit privacy guidelines, elucidating the content moderation policies applicable to their child's digital profile.

Chris Marchese, the director of NetChoice's litigation center, articulated the organization's stance, underscoring the conviction that families, armed with adequate educational resources, possess the requisite discernment to navigate online services and privacy considerations autonomously. Marchese further elaborated on the organization's commitment to championing the rights and privacy of Ohio residents, vowing to contest any legislative measures perceived as encroachments upon these fundamental liberties. Notably, NetChoice has previously secured legal victories against analogous legislative restrictions in states such as California and Arkansas, signaling a consistent track record in challenging regulatory frameworks perceived as overly restrictive.

Conversely, Husted, a fervent advocate for Ohio's technological initiatives and a staunch proponent of the contested legislation, derided the legal challenge as a "cowardly" maneuver orchestrated by tech conglomerates prioritizing their commercial interests over children's welfare. In a pointed statement, Husted accused these tech entities of knowingly perpetuating algorithms that inflict detrimental health and mental repercussions upon young users, thereby exacerbating concerns surrounding their pervasive influence. As this legal dispute unfolds, the ensuing legal proceedings and public discourse are poised to shape the regulatory landscape governing children's access to digital platforms, weighing the imperatives of online safety against constitutional rights and commercial considerations.

MENAFN07012024000045015682ID1107692785