Torex Gold Reports Q1 2026 Results
| | | | Three Months Ended | | ||||||
| | | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | | |
| Safety | | | | | | | | | | |
| Lost-time injury frequency1 | /million hours | | 0.00 | | | 0.07 | | | 0.59 | |
| Total recordable injury frequency1 | /million hours | | 0.61 | | | 0.73 | | | 1.52 | |
| Operating Results - Gold Equivalent basis | | | | | | | ||||
| Gold equivalent produced | oz AuEq | | 100,874 | | | 117,325 | | | 59,777 | |
| Gold equivalent payable produced2 | oz AuEq | | 98,482 | | | 114,844 | | | 59,630 | |
| Gold equivalent sold2 | oz AuEq | | 109,222 | | | 105,946 | | | 60,568 | |
| Total cash costs2,3 | $/oz AuEq | | 1,534 | | | 1,499 | | | 1,020 | |
| All-in sustaining costs2,3 | $/oz AuEq | | 1,917 | | | 1,905 | | | 1,405 | |
| Average realized gold price2,3 | $/oz AuEq | | 4,784 | | | 4,393 | | | 2,793 | |
| Financial Results | | | | | | | ||||
| Revenue | $ | | 539.3 | | | 465.3 | | | 170.0 | |
| Cost of sales | $ | | 226.7 | | | 214.7 | | | 94.1 | |
| Earnings from mine operations | $ | | 312.6 | | | 250.6 | | | 75.9 | |
| Net income | $ | | 207.5 | | | 166.8 | | | 39.0 | |
| Per share - Basic | $/share | | 2.18 | | | 1.78 | | | 0.45 | |
| Per share - Diluted | $/share | | 2.16 | | | 1.76 | | | 0.45 | |
| Adjusted net earnings3 | $ | | 199.7 | | | 161.0 | | | 35.9 | |
| Per share - Basic3 | $/share | | 2.10 | | | 1.72 | | | 0.42 | |
| Per share - Diluted3 | $/share | | 2.08 | | | 1.70 | | | 0.41 | |
| EBITDA 3 | $ | | 358.1 | | | 260.4 | | | 88.1 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA 3 | $ | | 358.6 | | | 273.0 | | | 91.8 | |
| Cost of sales - gold equivalent basis | $/oz AuEq | | 2,076 | | | 2,027 | | | 1,554 | |
| Net cash generated from (used in) operating activities | $ | | 209.8 | | | 244.3 | | | (9.9 | ) |
| Net cash generated from (used in) operating activities before changes in non-cash operating working capital | $ | | 174.2 | | | 248.6 | | | (17.7 | ) |
| Free cash flow3 | $ | | 157.3 | | | 165.6 | | | (133.3 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | | 130.0 | | | 119.5 | | | 106.5 | |
| Debt, net of deferred finance charges | $ | | - | | | 27.6 | | | 193.1 | |
| Lease-related obligations | $ | | 101.1 | | | 105.6 | | | 86.5 | |
| Net cash (debt)3 | $ | | 28.9 | | | (16.1 | ) | | (175.0 | ) |
| Available liquidity3 | $ | | 466.9 | | | 426.3 | | | 197.6 | |
Table 2: Reconciliation of Total Cash Costs and All-in Sustaining Costs to Production Costs and Royalties
| | | | Three Months Ended | | ||||||
| | | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted | | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | |
| Gold sold | oz | | 81,233 | | | 87,262 | | | 59,756 | |
| Total cash costs per oz sold | | | | | | | | |||
| Production costs | $ | | 151.3 | | | 145.3 | | | 56.2 | |
| Royalties | $ | | 19.0 | | | 15.6 | | | 6.0 | |
| Silver sales1 | $ | | (47.2 | ) | | (31.8 | ) | | (1.1 | ) |
| Copper sales1 | $ | | (88.8 | ) | | (62.6 | ) | | (1.2 | ) |
| Treatment, refining and other cost deductions | $ | | (2.4 | ) | | 1.4 | | | - | |
| Realized gain on foreign currency contracts | $ | | (0.4 | ) | | (3.5 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
| Total cash costs | $ | | 31.5 | | | 64.4 | | | 59.5 | |
| Total cash costs per oz sold | $/oz | | 388 | | | 738 | | | 996 | |
| All-in sustaining costs per oz sold | | | | | | | | |||
| Total cash costs | $ | | 31.5 | | | 64.4 | | | 59.5 | |
| General and administrative costs 2 | $ | | 10.2 | | | 9.7 | | | 8.7 | |
| Reclamation and remediation costs | $ | | 2.0 | | | 1.2 | | | 1.0 | |
| Sustaining capital expenditure3 | $ | | 29.7 | | | 32.1 | | | 13.6 | |
| Total all-in sustaining costs | $ | | 73.4 | | | 107.4 | | | 82.8 | |
| Total all-in sustaining costs per oz sold | $/oz | | 904 | | | 1,231 | | | 1,386 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Gold equivalent sold4 | oz AuEq | | 109,222 | | | 105,946 | | | 60,568 | |
| Total cash costs per oz AuEq sold | | | | | | | | |||
| Production costs | $ | | 151.3 | | | 145.3 | | | 56.2 | |
| Royalties | $ | | 19.0 | | | 15.6 | | | 6.0 | |
| Treatment, refining and other cost deductions | $ | | (2.4 | ) | | 1.4 | | | - | |
| Realized gain on foreign currency contracts | $ | | (0.4 | ) | | (3.5 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
| Total cash costs | $ | | 167.5 | | | 158.8 | | | 61.8 | |
| Total cash costs per oz AuEq sold4 | $/oz AuEq | | 1,534 | | | 1,499 | | | 1,020 | |
| All-in sustaining costs per oz AuEq sold | | | | | | | | |||
| Total cash costs | $ | | 167.5 | | | 158.8 | | | 61.8 | |
| General and administrative costs 2 | $ | | 10.2 | | | 9.7 | | | 8.7 | |
| Reclamation and remediation costs | $ | | 2.0 | | | 1.2 | | | 1.0 | |
| Sustaining capital expenditure3 | $ | | 29.7 | | | 32.1 | | | 13.6 | |
| Total all-in sustaining costs | $ | | 209.4 | | | 201.8 | | | 85.1 | |
| Total all-in sustaining costs per oz AuEq sold4 | $/oz AuEq | | 1,917 | | | 1,905 | | | 1,405 | |
Table 3: Reconciliation of Sustaining and Non-Sustaining Capital Expenditures to Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment
| | | Three Months Ended | | ||||||
| | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| In millions of U.S. dollars | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | |
| Sustaining | $ | 22.0 | | | 24.6 | | | 12.8 | |
| Lease Payments (Sustaining) | $ | 7.7 | | | 7.5 | | | 0.8 | |
| Total Sustaining | $ | 29.7 | | | 32.1 | | | 13.6 | |
| Non-sustaining | | | | | | | |||
| Media Luna Project1 | $ | 8.2 | | | 15.3 | | | 55.5 | |
| Media Luna North Project | $ | 14.7 | | | 10.2 | | | 4.0 | |
| Media Luna North Drilling | $ | 3.1 | | | 0.1 | | | 0.2 | |
| Working Capital Changes and Other | $ | (7.1 | ) | | 9.7 | | | 50.2 | |
| Capital expenditures2 | $ | 48.6 | | | 67.4 | | | 123.5 | |
Table 4: Reconciliation of Average Realized Gold Price to Revenue
| | | | Three Months Ended | | ||||||
| | | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted | | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | |
| Gold sold | oz | | 81,233 | | | 87,262 | | | 59,756 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Revenue | $ | | 539.3 | | | 465.3 | | | 170.0 | |
| Silver sales1 | $ | | (47.2 | ) | | (31.8 | ) | | (1.1 | ) |
| Copper sales1 | $ | | (88.8 | ) | | (62.6 | ) | | (1.2 | ) |
| Treatment, refining and other cost deductions | $ | | (2.4 | ) | | 1.4 | | | - | |
| Realized loss on gold contracts | $ | | - | | | (1.3 | ) | | (0.8 | ) |
| Total proceeds | $ | | 400.9 | | | 371.0 | | | 166.9 | |
| Average realized gold price | $/oz | | 4,935 | | | 4,252 | | | 2,793 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Gold equivalent sold2 | oz AuEq | | 109,222 | | | 105,946 | | | 60,568 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Revenue | $ | | 539.3 | | | 465.3 | | | 170.0 | |
| Treatment, refining and other cost deductions | $ | | (2.4 | ) | | 1.4 | | | - | |
| Realized loss on gold contracts | $ | | - | | | (1.3 | ) | | (0.8 | ) |
| Realized loss on QP Hedges | $ | | (14.4 | ) | | - | | | - | |
| Total proceeds | $ | | 522.5 | | | 465.4 | | | 169.2 | |
| Average realized gold price | $/oz AuEq | | 4,784 | | | 4,393 | | | 2,793 | |
Table 5: Reconciliation of All-in Sustaining Costs Margin to Revenue
| | | | Three Months Ended | | ||||||
| | | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted | | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | |
| Gold sold | oz | | 81,233 | | | 87,262 | | | 59,756 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Revenue | $ | | 539.3 | | | 465.3 | | | 170.0 | |
| Silver sales1 | $ | | (47.2 | ) | | (31.8 | ) | | (1.1 | ) |
| Copper sales1 | $ | | (88.8 | ) | | (62.6 | ) | | (1.2 | ) |
| Treatment, refining and other cost deductions | $ | | (2.4 | ) | | 1.4 | | | - | |
| Realized loss on gold contracts | $ | | - | | | (1.3 | ) | | (0.8 | ) |
| All-in sustaining costs | $ | | (73.4 | ) | | (107.4 | ) | | (82.8 | ) |
| All-in sustaining costs margin | $ | | 327.5 | | | 263.6 | | | 84.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Average realized gold price | $/oz | | 4,935 | | | 4,252 | | | 2,793 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Total all-in sustaining costs margin | $/oz | | 4,031 | | | 3,021 | | | 1,407 | |
| Total all-in sustaining costs margin | % | | 82 | | | 71 | | | 50 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Gold equivalent sold2 | oz AuEq | | 109,222 | | | 105,946 | | | 60,568 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Revenue | $ | | 539.3 | | | 465.3 | | | 170.0 | |
| Treatment, refining and other cost deductions | $ | | (2.4 | ) | | 1.4 | | | - | |
| Realized loss on gold contracts | $ | | - | | | (1.3 | ) | | (0.8 | ) |
| Realized loss on QP Hedges | $ | | (14.4 | ) | | - | | | - | |
| All-in sustaining costs | $ | | (209.4 | ) | | (201.8 | ) | | (85.1 | ) |
| All-in sustaining costs margin | $ | | 313.1 | | | 263.6 | | | 84.1 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Average realized gold price | $/oz AuEq | | 4,784 | | | 4,393 | | | 2,793 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Total all-in sustaining costs margin2 | $/oz AuEq | | 2,867 | | | 2,488 | | | 1,388 | |
| Total all-in sustaining costs margin | % | | 60 | | | 57 | | | 50 | |
Table 6: Reconciliation of Adjusted Net Earnings to Net Income
| | | | Three Months Ended | | ||||||
| In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted | | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | | |
| Basic weighted average shares outstanding | shares | | 95,313,769 | | | 93,644,666 | | | 86,125,855 | |
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | shares | | 95,970,052 | | | 94,779,109 | | | 87,326,899 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | | 207.5 | | | 166.8 | | | 39.0 | |
| | | | | | | | | |||
| Adjustments: | | | | | | | | |||
| Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss | $ | | (0.8 | ) | | 0.2 | | | (0.7 | ) |
| Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative contracts, excluding QP Hedges | $ | | 0.1 | | | 3.0 | | | (3.2 | ) |
| Loss on remeasurement of share-based payments | $ | | 1.2 | | | 9.4 | | | 7.6 | |
| Derecognition of provisions for uncertain tax positions | $ | | (12.7 | ) | | - | | | (9.2 | ) |
| Tax effect of above adjustments | $ | | 0.2 | | | (1.0 | ) | | 1.2 | |
| Tax effect of currency translation on tax base | $ | | 4.2 | | | (17.4 | ) | | 1.2 | |
| Adjusted net earnings | $ | | 199.7 | | | 161.0 | | | 35.9 | |
| Per share - Basic | $/share | | 2.10 | | | 1.72 | | | 0.42 | |
| Per share - Diluted | $/share | | 2.08 | | | 1.70 | | | 0.41 | |
Table 7: Reconciliation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to Net Income
| | | Three Months Ended | | ||||||
| | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| In millions of U.S. dollars | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | |
| Net income | $ | 207.5 | | | 166.8 | | | 39.0 | |
| | | | | | | | |||
| Finance costs and other, net | $ | 2.7 | | | 6.2 | | | 2.6 | |
| Depreciation and amortization1 | $ | 56.5 | | | 53.9 | | | 32.0 | |
| Current income tax expense | $ | 88.7 | | | 96.9 | | | 6.0 | |
| Deferred income tax expense (recovery) | $ | 2.7 | | | (63.4 | ) | | 8.5 | |
| EBITDA | $ | 358.1 | | | 260.4 | | | 88.1 | |
| | | | | | | | |||
| Adjustments: | | | | | | | |||
| Unrealized loss (gain) on derivative contracts, excluding QP Hedges | $ | 0.1 | | | 3.0 | | | (3.2 | ) |
| Unrealized foreign exchange (gain) loss | $ | (0.8 | ) | | 0.2 | | | (0.7 | ) |
| Loss on remeasurement of share-based payments | $ | 1.2 | | | 9.4 | | | 7.6 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 358.6 | | | 273.0 | | | 91.8 | |
Table 8: Reconciliation of Free Cash Flow to Net Cash Generated from Operating Activities
| | | Three Months Ended | | ||||||
| | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| In millions of U.S. dollars | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | |
| Net cash generated from (used in) operating activities | $ | 209.8 | | | 244.3 | | | (9.9 | ) |
| Adjusted for: | | | | | | | |||
| Additions to property, plant and equipment1 | $ | (48.6 | ) | | (67.4 | ) | | (123.5 | ) |
| Value-added tax receivables, net2 | $ | 5.6 | | | 1.6 | | | 7.6 | |
| Lease payments | $ | (5.4 | ) | | (5.0 | ) | | (3.4 | ) |
| Interest and other borrowing costs paid3 | $ | (4.1 | ) | | (7.9 | ) | | (4.1 | ) |
| Free cash flow | $ | 157.3 | | | 165.6 | | | (133.3 | ) |
Table 9: Reconciliation of Net Cash to Cash and Cash Equivalents
| | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| In millions of U.S. dollars | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 130.0 | | | 119.5 | | | 106.5 | |
| Adjusted for: | | | | | | | |||
| Debt | $ | - | | | (27.6 | ) | | (193.1 | ) |
| Lease-related obligations | $ | (101.1 | ) | | (105.6 | ) | | (86.5 | ) |
| Deferred finance charges | $ | - | | | (2.4 | ) | | (1.9 | ) |
| Net cash (debt) | $ | 28.9 | | | (16.1 | ) | | (175.0 | ) |
Table 10: Reconciliation of Available Liquidity to Cash and Cash Equivalents
| | | Mar 31, | | | Dec 31, | | | Mar 31, | |
| In millions of U.S. dollars | | 2026 | | | 2025 | | | 2025 | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 130.0 | | | 119.5 | | | 106.5 | |
| Available credit of the Debt Facility | $ | 336.9 | | | 306.8 | | | 91.1 | |
| Available liquidity | $ | 466.9 | | | 426.3 | | | 197.6 | |
Table 11: Reconciliation of Unit Cost Measures to Production Costs
| | | Three Months Ended | | |||||||||||||||
| In millions of U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted | | Mar 31, 2026 | | | | | Dec 31, 2025 | | | | | Mar 31, 2025 | | | | |||
| Gold sold (oz AuEq) | | 109,222 | | | | | 105,946 | | | | | 60,568 | | | | |||
| Gold sold (oz) | | 81,233 | | | | | 87,262 | | | | | 59,756 | | | | |||
| Tonnes mined - ELG open pit (kt) | | - | | | | | - | | | | | 672 | | | | |||
| Tonnes mined - ELG underground (kt) | | 276 | | | | | 292 | | | | | 187 | | | | |||
| Tonnes mined - Media Luna underground (kt)1 | | 682 | | | | | 649 | | | | | 100 | | | | |||
| Tonnes processed (kt) | | 944 | | | | | 985 | | | | | 705 | | | | |||
| Total cash costs: | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||
| Total cash costs ($) - gold equivalent basis | | 167.5 | | | | | 158.8 | | | | | 61.8 | | | | |||
| Total cash costs per oz AuEq sold ($) | | 1,534 | | | | | 1,499 | | | | | 1,020 | | | | |||
| Total cash costs ($) - gold only basis | | 31.5 | | | | | 64.4 | | | | | 59.5 | | | | |||
| Total cash costs per oz sold ($) | | 388 | | | | | 738 | | | | | 996 | | | | |||
| Breakdown of production costs | | $ | | | $/t | | | $ | | | $/t | | | $ | | | $/t | |
| Mining - ELG open pit | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | 6.0 | | | 8.87 | |
| Mining - ELG underground | | 21.8 | | | 78.89 | | | 21.7 | | | 74.29 | | | 15.0 | | | 80.45 | |
| Mining - Media Luna underground1 | | 33.0 | | | 48.39 | | | 36.1 | | | 55.62 | | | - | | | - | |
| Processing | | 47.1 | | | 49.88 | | | 47.5 | | | 48.23 | | | 25.2 | | | 35.72 | |
| Site support | | 26.3 | | | 27.85 | | | 25.3 | | | 25.69 | | | 8.1 | | | 11.53 | |
| Mexican profit sharing (PTU) | | 9.4 | | | 9.95 | | | 9.2 | | | 9.34 | | | 2.1 | | | 2.98 | |
| Inventory movement | | 4.8 | | | | | (2.2 | ) | | | | (1.5 | ) | | | |||
| Concentrate logistics | | 5.5 | | | | | 4.3 | | | | | - | | | | |||
| Other | | 3.4 | | | | | 3.4 | | | | | 1.3 | | | | |||
| Production costs | | 151.3 | | | | | 145.3 | | | | | 56.2 | | | |
Table 12: Mineral Reserve Estimate (December 31, 2025)
| Property | Deposit | Reserve Category | Tonnes (kt) | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Cu (%) | Au (koz) | Ag (koz) | Cu (Mlb) | AuEq (gpt) | AuEq (koz) |
| Morelos | Media Luna Underground | Proven | 7,396 | 2.93 | 25.7 | 0.82 | 696 | 6,106 | 134 | 4.60 | 1,095 |
| Probable | 15,210 | 2.41 | 21.9 | 0.82 | 1,178 | 10,719 | 273 | 4.02 | 1,968 | ||
| Proven/Probable | 22,607 | 2.58 | 23.1 | 0.82 | 1,874 | 16,825 | 408 | 4.21 | 3,062 | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Media Luna North Underground | Proven | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | Probable | 5,546 | 1.89 | 25.6 | 1.10 | 337 | 4,556 | 135 | 4.03 | 719 | |
| | Proven/Probable | 5,546 | 1.89 | 25.6 | 1.10 | 337 | 4,556 | 135 | 4.03 | 719 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ELG Underground | Proven | 1,412 | 4.36 | 7.2 | 0.31 | 198 | 328 | 10 | 4.96 | 225 |
| | Probable | 3,598 | 4.17 | 7.2 | 0.29 | 482 | 828 | 23 | 4.74 | 548 | |
| | Proven/Probable | 5,011 | 4.22 | 7.2 | 0.30 | 680 | 1,157 | 33 | 4.80 | 773 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ELG Open Pit | Proven | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | Probable | 614 | 2.43 | 15.8 | 0.46 | 48 | 312 | 6 | 2.62 | 52 | |
| | Proven/Probable | 614 | 2.43 | 15.8 | 0.46 | 48 | 312 | 6 | 2.62 | 52 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Stockpiles | Proven | 5,876 | 1.15 | 3.5 | 0.10 | 218 | 669 | 13 | 1.23 | 233 |
| | | Probable | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | | Proven/Probable | 5,876 | 1.15 | 3.5 | 0.10 | 218 | 669 | 13 | 1.23 | 233 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | Proven/Probable | 39,653 | 2.48 | 18.4 | 0.68 | 3,158 | 23,519 | 594 | 3.80 | 4,839 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Torex (All) | Total | Proven/Probable | 39,653 | 2.48 | 18.4 | 0.68 | 3,158 | 23,519 | 594 | 3.80 | 4,839 |
Notes to accompany the mineral reserve table:
Mineral reserves were developed in accordance with CIM (2019) guidelines. Mineral reserves are founded on Measured and Indicated Resources, with an effective date of December 31, 2025, unless otherwise noted. Mineral reserves are considered appropriate for metal prices of $1,650/oz gold ("Au"), $21/oz silver ("Ag"), and $3.85/lb copper ("Cu"), unless otherwise noted. Rounding may result in apparent summation differences between tonnes, grade, and contained metal content. Stockpile mineral reserves are estimated using production and survey data and apply the gold equivalent ("AuEq") formula for the intended processing method. AuEq on a total basis is established from combined contributions of the various deposits. AuEq estimates account for metal prices and metallurgical recoveries. The qualified person for the mineral reserve estimate is Johannes (Gertjan) Bekkers, P. Eng., an independent contractor and former VP of Mines Technical Services for Torex Gold. The qualified person is not aware of mining, metallurgical, infrastructure, permitting, or other factors that materially affect the mineral reserve estimates. Morelos - Media Luna Underground:a) Mineral reserves are reported above an in-situ ore cut-off grade of 2.4 gpt AuEq and an in-situ incremental cut-off grade of 2.0 gpt AuEq. Cut-off grades and mining shapes assume metallurgical recoveries of 90% Au, 86% Ag, and 93% Cu.
b) Mineral reserves within designed mine shapes assume long-hole open stoping, supplemented with mechanized cut-and-fill mining and include estimates for dilution and mining losses.
c) AuEq = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0122) + (Cu (%) * 1.6533). Morelos - Media Luna North Underground:
a) Mineral reserves are reported above an in-situ ore cut-off grade of 2.5 gpt AuEq and an in-situ incremental cut-off grade of 2.0 gpt AuEq. Cut-off grades and mining shapes assume metallurgical recoveries of 89% Au, 88% Ag, and 92% Cu.
b) Mineral reserves within designed mine shapes assume long-hole open stoping, supplemented with mechanized cut-and-fill mining and include estimates for dilution and mining losses.
c) AuEq = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0126) + (Cu (%) * 1.6539). Morelos - ELG Underground:
a) Mineral reserves are reported above an in-situ ore cut-off grade of 2.8 gpt AuEq and an in-situ incremental cut-off grade of 1.6 gpt AuEq. Cut-off grades and mining shapes assume metallurgical recoveries of 90% Au, 86% Ag, and 93% Cu.
b) Mineral reserves within designed mine shapes assume mechanized cut and fill supplemented with long hole mining method and include estimates for dilution and mining losses.
c) AuEq = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0122) + (Cu (%) * 1.6533). Morelos - ELG Open Pit:
a) ELG Open Pit mineral reserves are reported above an in-situ cut-off grade of 1.2 gpt Au and including low grade mineral reserves are reported above an in-situ cut-off grade of 0.88 gpt Au.
b) Assumes average metallurgical recoveries of 89% Au, 30% Ag, and 15% Cu.
c) Mineral reserves within the designed pit include assumed estimates for dilution and ore losses.
d) AuEq = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0043) + (Cu (%) * 0.2697). Morelos - Stockpiles:
a) Stockpiles include open pit and underground material previously mined.
b) Open pit stockpiles assumed metallurgical recoveries of 89% Au, 30% Ag, and 15% Cu and underground stockpiles assume 90% Au, 86% Ag, and 93% Cu.
c) AuEq (blended) = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0056) + (Cu (%) * 0.5948) based on AuEq (open pit) = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0043) + (Cu (%) * 0.2697) and AuEq (underground) = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0122) + (Cu (%) * 1.6533).
Table 13: Mineral Resource Estimate (December 31, 2025)
| Property | Deposit | Resource Category | Tonnes (kt) | Au (gpt) | Ag (gpt) | Cu (%) | Au (koz) | Ag (koz) | Cu (Mlb) | AuEq (gpt) | AuEq (koz) |
| Morelos | Media Luna Underground | Measured | 9,618 | 3.03 | 28.2 | 0.92 | 936 | 8,728 | 196 | 4.88 | 1,508 |
| Indicated | 24,070 | 2.33 | 23.5 | 0.87 | 1,800 | 18,165 | 461 | 4.03 | 3,115 | ||
| Measured/Indicated | 33,687 | 2.53 | 24.8 | 0.88 | 2,736 | 26,893 | 656 | 4.27 | 4,623 | ||
| Inferred | 8,211 | 2.26 | 19.3 | 0.84 | 596 | 5,087 | 152 | 3.86 | 1,018 | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Media Luna North Underground | Measured | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | Indicated | 7,598 | 2.13 | 26.8 | 1.11 | 520 | 6,537 | 187 | 4.28 | 1,046 | |
| | Measured/Indicated | 7,598 | 2.13 | 26.8 | 1.11 | 520 | 6,537 | 187 | 4.28 | 1,046 | |
| | Inferred | 9,687 | 1.78 | 31.9 | 1.08 | 554 | 9,936 | 230 | 3.94 | 1,226 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Media Luna West Underground | Measured | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | Indicated | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| | Measured/Indicated | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| | Inferred | 3,079 | 4.49 | 8.6 | 0.35 | 445 | 848 | 23 | 5.11 | 506 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ELG Underground | Measured | 3,974 | 4.01 | 6.1 | 0.26 | 512 | 775 | 22 | 4.50 | 575 |
| | Indicated | 7,364 | 3.57 | 6.0 | 0.24 | 845 | 1,427 | 39 | 4.03 | 955 | |
| | Measured/Indicated | 11,338 | 3.72 | 6.0 | 0.25 | 1,357 | 2,203 | 62 | 4.20 | 1,530 | |
| | Inferred | 1,074 | 3.92 | 6.4 | 0.29 | 135 | 220 | 7 | 4.46 | 154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | ELG | Measured | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | Open Pit | Indicated | 523 | 3.54 | 14.4 | 0.45 | 59 | 241 | 5 | 3.72 | 63 |
| | | Measured/Indicated | 523 | 3.54 | 14.4 | 0.45 | 59 | 241 | 5 | 3.72 | 63 |
| | | Inferred | 6 | 3.56 | 5.9 | 0.45 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3.70 | 1 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | Measured/Indicated | 53,146 | 2.73 | 21.0 | 0.78 | 4,672 | 35,874 | 910 | 4.25 | 7,262 |
| | | Inferred | 22,057 | 2.44 | 22.7 | 0.85 | 1,731 | 16,093 | 412 | 4.10 | 2,906 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Los Reyes | Open Pit Mill | Measured | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | Indicated | 24,657 | 1.13 | 35.7 | - | 899 | 28,261 | - | 1.52 | 1,209 | |
| | Measured/Indicated | 24,657 | 1.13 | 35.7 | - | 899 | 28,261 | - | 1.52 | 1,209 | |
| | Inferred | 7,211 | 0.89 | 42.8 | - | 207 | 9,916 | - | 1.36 | 316 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Underground Mill | Measured | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | Indicated | 4,132 | 3.02 | 152.4 | - | 402 | 20,243 | - | 4.70 | 624 | |
| | Measured/Indicated | 4,132 | 3.02 | 152.4 | - | 402 | 20,243 | - | 4.70 | 624 | |
| | Inferred | 4,055 | 2.10 | 78.6 | - | 273 | 10,247 | - | 2.96 | 386 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Open Pit Heap Leach | Measured | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| | Indicated | 20,254 | 0.29 | 8.4 | - | 190 | 5,492 | - | 0.33 | 215 | |
| | Measured/Indicated | 20,254 | 0.29 | 8.4 | - | 190 | 5,492 | - | 0.33 | 215 | |
| | Inferred | 5,944 | 0.30 | 7.3 | - | 58 | 1,398 | - | 0.33 | 64 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total | Measured/Indicated | 49,042 | 0.95 | 34.2 | - | 1,491 | 53,995 | - | 1.30 | 2,047 |
| | | Inferred | 17,210 | 0.97 | 39.0 | - | 538 | 21,561 | - | 1.38 | 765 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Torex (All) | Total | Measured/Indicated | 102,188 | 1.88 | 27.4 | 0.40 | 6,163 | 89,870 | 910 | 2.83 | 9,309 |
| | | Inferred | 39,267 | 1.80 | 29.8 | 0.48 | 2,269 | 37,654 | 412 | 2.91 | 3,671 |
Notes to accompany the mineral resource table:
Mineral resources were prepared in accordance with the CIM Definition Standards (2014) and Estimation of Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Best Practice guidelines (2019). Gold equivalent ("AuEq") of total mineral resources is established from combined contributions of the various deposits. AuEq estimates account for metal prices and metallurgical recoveries. Mineral resources are inclusive of mineral reserves (excluding stockpiles). Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Numbers may not add due to rounding. Mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing, or other relevant issues.Notes to accompany Morelos mineral resources:
The effective date of the estimates is December 31, 2025. Mineral resources are depleted above a mining surface or to the as-mined solids as of December 31, 2025. Mineral resources for Morelos are based on underlying metal prices of $1,800/oz gold ("Au"), $24/oz silver ("Ag"), $4.10/lb copper ("Cu"), unless otherwise noted. The preparation of the estimates was prepared by Rochelle Collins, P. Geo. (Ontario), Principal, Mineral Resources for Torex Gold. Morelos - Media Luna Underground:a) Mineral resources are reported above a 2.0 gpt AuEq cut-off grade. The assumed underground mining methods are a combination of long-hole open stoping and mechanized cut-and-fill.
b) Mineral resources were estimated using ID3 method applied to 1.5 m capped downhole assay composites within lithology domains and internal grade domains. Block model block size is 5 m x 5 m x 5 m with 2.5 m x 2.5 m x 2.5 m sub-blocks.
c) Assumes metallurgical recoveries of 90% Au, 86% Ag, and 93% Cu.
d) The dataset allowed the bulk density to be directly estimated into the domains with an average bulk density of 3.2 g/cm3.
e) AuEq = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0127) + (Cu (%) * 1.6140). Morelos - Media Luna North Underground:
a) Mineral resources are reported above a 2.0 gpt AuEq cut-off grade. The assumed underground mining method is long-hole open stoping.
b) Mineral resources were estimated using ID3 method applied to 1.0 m capped downhole assay composites within lithology domains and internal grade domains. Block model block size is 5 m x 5 m x 5 m with 2.5 m x 2.5 m x 2.5 m sub-blocks.
c) Assumes metallurgical recoveries of 89% Au, 88% Ag, and 92% Cu.
d) The dataset allowed the bulk density to be directly estimated into the domains with an average bulk density of 3.5 g/cm3.
e) AuEq = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0132) + (Cu (%) * 1.6145). Morelos - Media Luna West Underground:
a) Mineral resources are reported above a 2.1 gpt AuEq cut-off grade. The assumed mining method is from underground methods, using long-hole open stoping.
b) Mineral resources were estimated using ID3 method applied to 3.0 m capped downhole assay composites within lithology domains and internal grade domains. Block model block size is 5 m x 5 m x 5 m.
c) Assumes metallurgical recoveries of 88% Au, 75% Ag, and 85% Cu.
d) The dataset allowed the bulk density to be directly estimated into the domains with an average bulk density of 3.2 g/cm3.
e) AuEq = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0114) + (Cu (%) * 1.5086). Morelos - ELG Underground:
a) Mineral resources are reported above a 2.2 gpt AuEq cut-off grade. The assumed underground mining method is mechanized cut-and-fill.
b) Mineral resources were estimated using ordinary kriging method applied to 1.5 m capped downhole assay composites within lithology domains and internal grade domains. Block model block size is 5 m x 5 m x 5 m with 2.5 m x 2.5 m x 2.5 m sub-blocks.
c) Assumes metallurgical recoveries of 90% Au, 86% Ag, and 93% Cu.
d) The dataset allowed the bulk density to be directly estimated into the domains with an average bulk density of 3.4 g/cm3.
e) AuEq = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0127) + (Cu (%) * 1.6140). Morelos - ELG Open Pit:
a) Mineral resources for ELG Open Pit are reported above an in-situ cut-off grade of 0.78 gpt Au.
b) Mineral resources were estimated using ordinary kriging method applied to 1.5 m capped downhole assay composites within lithology domains and internal grade domains. Block model size is 5 m x 5 m x 5 m with 2.5 m x 2.5 m x 2.5 m sub-blocks. Mineral resources are reported inside an optimized pit shell, underground mineral reserves at ELD within the El Limón pit shell have been excluded from the open pit mineral resources.
c) Average metallurgical recoveries are 89% Au, 30% Ag, and 15% Cu.
d) The dataset allowed the bulk density to be directly estimated into the domains with an average bulk density of 3.4 g/cm3.
e) AuEq = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0045) + (Cu (%) * 0.2632).
Notes to accompany Los Reyes mineral resources:
The effective date of the estimates is October 15, 2024. Mineral resources for Los Reyes are based on underlying metal prices of $1,950/oz Au and $25.24/oz Ag, unless otherwise noted. The estimate was prepared by John Sims, President of Sims Resources LLC, an independent contractor and QP as a CPG member with AIPG. Los Reyes - Open Pit (Mill and Heap Leach):a) Open Pit Resource estimates are based on economically constrained open pits generated using the Hochbaum Pseudoflow algorithm in Datamine's Studio NPVS and the following optimization parameters:
b) Assumes mill recoveries of 95.6% for Au and 81% for Ag and heap leach recoveries of 73% Au and 25% Ag.
c) Pit slopes by area ranging from 42-47 degrees overall slope angle.
d) 5% ore loss and 5% dilution factor applied to the 5 m x 5 m x 5 m open pit resource block models.
e) Mining costs of $2.00 per tonne of waste mined and $2.50 per tonne of ore mined. Milling costs of $16.81 per tonne processed. Heap leach costs of $5.53 per tonne processed. G&A cost of $2.00 per tonne of material processed. Royalty of 3% and selling cost of 1% were also applied.
f) A 0.17 gpt gold only cutoff was applied to ex-pit processed material (which is above the heap-leaching NSR cutoff).
g) AuEq (Open Pit Mill) = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0110) and AuEq (Open Pit Heap Leach) = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0046). Los Reyes - Underground (Mill):
a) Underground Resource estimates are based on economically constrained stopes generated using Datamine's Mineable Shape Optimizer (MSO) algorithm and the following optimization parameters:
b) Diluted to a minimum 4 m stope width with a 98% mining recovery.
c) Assumes mill recoveries of 95.6% for Au and 81% for Ag.
d) Mechanized cut-and-fill mining with a $60.00 per tonne cost. Milling costs of $16.81 per tonne processed. G&A cost of $4.00 per tonne of material processed. Royalty of 3% and selling cost of 1% were also applied.
e) AuEq (Underground Mill) = Au (gpt) + (Ag (gpt) * 0.0110).
ABOUT TOREX GOLD RESOURCES INC.
Torex Gold Resources Inc. is a Canadian mining company engaged in the exploration, development, and production of gold, copper, and silver from its flagship Morelos Complex in Guerrero, Mexico. The Company also owns the Los Reyes gold-silver project in Sinaloa and a portfolio of early-stage exploration properties, including the Batopilas and Guigui projects in Chihuahua, Mexico, and the Medicine Springs project in Nevada, USA as well as an option to acquire the Gryphon project in Nevada, USA.
The Company's key strategic objectives are: optimize Morelos production and costs; disciplined growth and capital allocation; grow reserves and resources; project delivery excellence; retain and attract best industry talent; and be an industry leader in responsible mining. In addition to realizing the full potential of the Morelos Property, the Company continues to seek opportunities to acquire assets that enable diversification and deliver value to shareholders.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:
TOREX GOLD RESOURCES INC.
Jody Kuzenko
President and CEO
Direct: (647) 725-9982
...
Dan Rollins
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development & Investor Relations
Direct: (647) 260-1503
...
QUALIFIED PERSONS
The technical and scientific information contained in this press release pertaining to metal production and 2026 production guidance has been reviewed and approved by Miguel Pimentel P.Eng., Vice President, Metallurgy and Process Engineering of the Company, who is a qualified person under National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").
The scientific and technical information contained in this press release pertaining to mineral resources has been reviewed and approved by Rochelle Collins, P.Geo., Principal, Mineral Resources of Torex Gold Resources Inc. and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
The scientific and technical information contained in this press release pertaining to mineral reserves for the Morelos Complex has been reviewed and approved by Johannes (Gertjan) Bekkers, P.Eng., a contractor to Torex Gold (previously served as Vice-President, Mines Technical Services for the Company) and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
The scientific and technical data contained in this press release pertaining to mineral resources for Los Reyes have been reviewed and approved by John Sims, President of Sims Resources LLC, an independent contractor and qualified person as a CPG member with AIPG, and a Qualified Person under NI 43-101.
CAUTIONARY NOTES ON FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This press release contains“forward-looking statements” and“forward-looking information” (collectively,“Forward-Looking Information”) within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Forward-Looking Information includes, but is not limited to, information with respect to production and cost performance for the remainder of 2026 and beyond (including that gold equivalent production is tracking to plan, expected second quarter production levels, and expected increases and cost improvements in the second half of 2026); the Company's ability to continue to generate significant free cash flow and deliver on its capital allocation priorities; the timing and amount of returns to shareholders under the Company's enhanced return of capital program (including the targeted return of $350.0 million in 2026 through a combination of share repurchases and dividends), the declaration and payment of dividends, and the Company's plans with respect to the NCIB; the Company's ability to deliver significant free cash flow while also delivering on its capital allocation priorities; the timing for the release of a preliminary economic assessment for Los Reyes and the Company's expectations regarding the long-term value of Los Reyes; project development timelines and expectations for Media Luna North and Los Reyes; expected timelines and investments in exploration and drilling at Morelos, Los Reyes, and at the assets in Chihuahua and Nevada (including the Company's ability to put in place conditions to allow a safe return to drilling at Los Reyes); and the upcoming President and CEO transition (including the appointment and announcement of a new CFO). Forward-Looking Information also includes the Company's key strategic objectives: optimize Morelos production and costs; disciplined growth and capital allocation; grow reserves and resources; project delivery excellence; retain and attract best industry talent; and be an industry leader in responsible mining. Generally, Forward-Looking Information and statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as“forecast,”“plans,”“expects,” or“does not expect,”“is expected,”“strategic,”“to be” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results“will”,“may,”“could,”“would,”“might,”“on track,”, or“well positioned to” occur. Forward-Looking Information is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements of the company to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such Forward-Looking Information, including, without limitation, risks and uncertainties identified in the technical report (the“Technical Report”) released on March 31, 2022, entitled“NI 43-101 Technical Report ELG Mine Complex Life Of Mine Plan and Media Luna Feasibility Study”, which has an effective date of March 16, 2022, the Company's annual information form (“AIF”) for the year ended December 31, 2025, and management's discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the three months ended March 31, 2026 or other unknown but potentially significant impacts. Forward-Looking Information and statements are based on the assumptions discussed in the Technical Report, AIF and MD&A and such other reasonable assumptions, estimates, analysis and opinions of management made in light of its experience and perception of trends, current conditions and expected developments, and other factors that management believes are relevant and reasonable in the circumstances at the date such statements are made, including without limitation, that political and legal developments will be consistent with current expectations. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the Forward-Looking Information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on Forward-Looking Information. The Company does not undertake to update any Forward-Looking Information, whether as a result of new information or future events or otherwise, except as may be required by applicable securities laws. The Technical Report, MD&A and AIF are filed on SEDAR+ at and available on the Company's website at .
To view the source version of this press release, please visit
Source: Torex Gold Resources Inc.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.


Comments
No comment