
403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
Several media outlets refuse Pentagon’s new press policies
(MENAFN) Several leading American media organizations—including the Washington Post, New York Times, CNN, Associated Press, and Reuters—have rejected new press accreditation rules introduced by US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, according to reports.
The updated Pentagon policy would allow officials to classify journalists as “a security or safety risk” if they contact Department of War employees for sensitive information to include in their reporting. Outlets were reportedly instructed to sign the new agreement by Tuesday or lose their press credentials the following day.
In a statement on Monday, the Washington Post said the rules “undercut First Amendment protections by placing unnecessary constraints” on reporters. The New York Times similarly accused the Pentagon of attempting to punish journalists for “ordinary news gathering.”
Other major outlets—including the Wall Street Journal, NPR, The Atlantic, CNN, AP, and Reuters—have also declined to comply. Even Newsmax, which has generally been supportive of President Donald Trump’s administration, described the new terms as “unnecessary and onerous,” urging the Pentagon to reconsider.
Many of the outlets that refused to sign said they would continue reporting on US military affairs despite the potential loss of access.
In response to the backlash, Hegseth posted a waving-hand emoji on X beneath statements released by the Washington Post, the New York Times, and others, signaling their impending removal.
Defending the policy, Hegseth said the measures are intended to ensure that “press no longer roams free… wear visible badge… [and] no longer permitted to solicit criminal acts.”
The Pentagon Press Association, representing journalists covering the Department of War, said last week that Hegseth has been “systematically limiting access to information about the US military” since the start of the Trump administration.
Hegseth had previously evicted reporters from NBC News, the New York Times, and Politico from their Pentagon office spaces—though they retained entry privileges—and restricted most unescorted movement by journalists within the department’s headquarters.
The updated Pentagon policy would allow officials to classify journalists as “a security or safety risk” if they contact Department of War employees for sensitive information to include in their reporting. Outlets were reportedly instructed to sign the new agreement by Tuesday or lose their press credentials the following day.
In a statement on Monday, the Washington Post said the rules “undercut First Amendment protections by placing unnecessary constraints” on reporters. The New York Times similarly accused the Pentagon of attempting to punish journalists for “ordinary news gathering.”
Other major outlets—including the Wall Street Journal, NPR, The Atlantic, CNN, AP, and Reuters—have also declined to comply. Even Newsmax, which has generally been supportive of President Donald Trump’s administration, described the new terms as “unnecessary and onerous,” urging the Pentagon to reconsider.
Many of the outlets that refused to sign said they would continue reporting on US military affairs despite the potential loss of access.
In response to the backlash, Hegseth posted a waving-hand emoji on X beneath statements released by the Washington Post, the New York Times, and others, signaling their impending removal.
Defending the policy, Hegseth said the measures are intended to ensure that “press no longer roams free… wear visible badge… [and] no longer permitted to solicit criminal acts.”
The Pentagon Press Association, representing journalists covering the Department of War, said last week that Hegseth has been “systematically limiting access to information about the US military” since the start of the Trump administration.
Hegseth had previously evicted reporters from NBC News, the New York Times, and Politico from their Pentagon office spaces—though they retained entry privileges—and restricted most unescorted movement by journalists within the department’s headquarters.

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Casper Network Advances Regulated Tokenization With ERC-3643 Standard
- Forex Expo Dubai Wins Guinness World Recordstm With 20,021 Visitors
- Superiorstar Prosperity Group Russell Hawthorne Highlights New Machine Learning Risk Framework
- Freedom Holding Corp. (FRHC) Shares Included In The Motley Fool's TMF Moneyball Portfolio
- Versus Trade Launches Master IB Program: Multi-Tier Commission Structure
- Ozzy Tyres Grows Their Monsta Terrain Gripper Tyres Performing In Australian Summers
Comments
No comment