Pakistan's Financial Investment Mirage

Pakistan's economy faces persistent structural challenges that have hindered investment and economic growth for decades. The investment-to-GDP ratio has declined to 13.1% in FY24, marking its lowest level in 64 years, while neighboring economies such as India, Bangladesh, and Vietnam maintain ratios above 30%. This disparity highlights deep-rooted systemic issues that discourage productive capital inflows while fostering speculative and rent-seeking activities. Despite repeated efforts to attract foreign investment, fundamental barriers remain entrenched, limiting Pakistan's economic potential.

The country's approach to investment promotion often contrasts starkly with the realities on the ground. While officials present investment portfolios and reform pledges abroad, structural inefficiencies persist, reinforced by bureaucratic hurdles, regulatory unpredictability, and a taxation framework that is widely seen as a deterrent rather than an enabler of business growth. Investors frequently cite concerns over complex tax policies, legal uncertainties, and shifting economic regulations, making long-term planning difficult.

The recent hesitancy of Saudi Arabia-historically one of Pakistan's closest economic partners-to proceed with planned investments in May 2024 underscores these challenges. This decision reflects broader concerns about the investment climate, regulatory transparency, and policy consistency in Pakistan, even for allies with strategic interests in the country.

A critical factor contributing to this environment is the state's excessive reliance on revenues generated from taxation and borrowing, rather than fostering private sector-led growth. More than 60% of federal resources are allocated to debt servicing, leaving limited fiscal space for infrastructure development, industrial support, or investment incentives. Rather than implementing structural economic reforms to stimulate private sector growth, the regulatory landscape remains a maze where well-connected businesses benefit from exemptions while others struggle under restrictive policies.

Pakistan's exchange rate volatility and erratic fiscal policies further complicate investment planning. Business forecasting has become increasingly unpredictable, discouraging industrial expansion and reducing foreign direct investment (FDI). Despite initiatives like the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC), Pakistan attracted just $1.9 billion in FDI during the 2023-2024 fiscal year, a figure significantly lower than its annual external financing needs of approximately $25 billion. This mismatch between investment inflows and financial obligations continues to strain economic stability.

Additionally, Pakistan's Competitive Industrial Performance Index ranking declined from 78th in 1990 to 80th in 2022, reflecting ongoing deindustrialization. Over the past four decades, the industrial sector's share of GDP has shrunk at an average rate of 0.6% per year, highlighting the persistent shift of capital away from manufacturing toward unproductive sectors like real estate. This trend is not incidental but a consequence of policy choices that incentivize asset price inflation over industrial productivity.

The government's reliance on International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailouts-now totaling 25 programs-exemplifies the cyclical nature of Pakistan's financial distress. The latest $7 billion agreement, while providing short-term relief, does not address fundamental inefficiencies in governance, taxation, or energy sector management. While Pakistan has committed to tax increases equal to 3% of GDP, there has been little progress in tackling wasteful government spending, inefficient subsidies, and politically entrenched economic distortions.

Even when foreign investments materialize, they often come with conditions that introduce long-term economic distortions. The Karachi Electric Supply Company serves as a case study, where subsidies granted to attract private investment have resulted in ongoing financial burdens on public resources. Such policies, while initially designed to stimulate investment, frequently create imbalances that hinder sustainable economic growth.

The reluctance of successive governments to implement investment-friendly reforms stems from deep-seated political and economic structures. Expanding the tax base would require challenging influential groups that have historically avoided taxation, while liberalizing trade would threaten domestic industries that rely on protectionist policies. Reducing government expenditures could dismantle key political patronage networks, creating risks for policymakers reluctant to confront entrenched interests.

As a result, Pakistan continues to pursue short-term solutions such as borrowing, securing bilateral assistance, and making superficial policy adjustments, rather than enacting structural reforms. The fiscal deficit remains high, private sector credit is constrained, and economic productivity has stagnated. Despite nominal GDP growth, the 2.4% economic expansion recorded last year remains below the 2.6% population growth rate, indicating a rise in poverty levels rather than meaningful economic progress. Inflation further erodes purchasing power, while job creation remains insufficient to absorb new labor market entrants.

Even when policymakers acknowledge the need for reforms-such as prioritizing manufacturing over real estate, reducing corporate tax burdens, or easing trade restrictions-implementation remains inconsistent. Pakistan's estimated external financing needs of $146 billion from FY2024 to FY2029 underscore the urgent need for economic restructuring. However, its largest creditor, China, which holds $23.6 billion in bilateral loans, has shown limited willingness to engage in comprehensive debt restructuring, further complicating the country's financial outlook.

Domestic debt, comprising nearly 60% of Pakistan's total public debt, presents an even greater challenge. Addressing this issue requires political consensus and fiscal discipline, both of which have been elusive in Pakistan's governance landscape. The core of Pakistan's investment dilemma is not simply economic mismanagement, but an institutional structure that prioritizes rent-seeking over productivity. Until Pakistan fosters a business environment where success is driven by efficiency rather than political connections, where regulatory frameworks support rather than hinder markets, and where capital is allocated based on economic merit rather than speculative incentives, investment will remain elusive.

The road to economic stability lies not in diplomatic investment roadshows or temporary financial injections, but in fundamental reforms that align Pakistan's economic policies with its long-term development goals. Without decisive action, Pakistan's investment stagnation will persist, limiting its potential for sustainable growth and economic resilience.

DISCLAIMER – The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of The Khaama Press News Agency . We welcome opinions and submissions to Khaama Press Opinions/Exclusives – Please email them to ... .

MENAFN13032025000228011069ID1109309343