
US Rejects Visa Plea Of Indian Student With Columbia University Scholarship, Says No 'Strong Ties' To Home Country
The student, Kaushik Raj, aged 27, was due to pursue a graduate degree in journalism at Columbia University, having secured a substantial $100,000 scholarship.
Also Read | Colombia's Top Diplomat Renounces US Visa in 'Act of Dignity'
In an interview with The Washington Post, Raj clarified that during his application process, he made it abundantly clear that he was born and raised in India and that his entire family resides there. Despite these facts, he suspects the refusal may have stemmed from the mandatory review of his social media profiles by US officials.
Raj, a former journalist, explained that while he was not overly active on social media and avoided posting anything of a controversial nature, he had spent four years working in journalism and had shared links to his published stories. Although Raj speculates about the role of his digital footprint, the official rejection letter did not cite social media profiles as the specific reason for the decision.
The rejection letter said: "You were not able to demonstrate that your intended activities in the United States would be consistent with the classification of the nonimmigrant visa for which you applied."
An applicant has to demonstrate that they have a residence in a foreign country, which they have no intention of abandoning, it also said.
"Applicants usually meet this requirement by demonstrating that they have strong ties overseas that indicate they will return to a foreign country after a temporary visit to the United States. Such ties include professional, work, school, family, or social links to a foreign country. You have not demonstrated that you have the ties that will compel you to return to your home country after your travel to the United States."
Also Read | US visa chaos: As interview waiver ends, what does it mean for students? Decision cannot be appealedThe letter also mentioned that the decision cannot be appealed, but if he wants to reapply, he will have to submit a new application and appear for an interview and be prepared to explain how his circumstances have changed since this application.
Furthermore, the letter stipulated that the decision was final and unappealable. While he remained free to reapply, any subsequent application would necessitate the submission of new documentation, a further interview, and a clear explanation of how his personal circumstances had altered.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Mutuum Finance (MUTM) New Crypto Coin Eyes Next Price Increase As Phase 6 Reaches 50% Sold
- Bydfi Highlights 'BUIDL' Ethos During Newcastle United Match Against Arsenal
- Flexm Recognized As“Highly Commended” In The Regtech Category At The Asia Fintech Awards Singapore 2025
- Solotto Launches As Solana's First-Ever Community-Powered On-Chain Lottery
- Moonx: The Leading Crypto Trading Platform With X1000 Leverage And Unlimited Meme Coin Access
- Stonehaven Circle Marks 13Th Anniversary With Hadrian Colwyn Leading Calvio Ailegacyx Innovation
Comments
No comment