Why Trump Believes He Can Push Modi Around

Latest stories

China's export juggernaut defying and denying Trump's tariffs

Standardize the pipes: ASEAN's answer to a fracturing trade map

How Trump's India tariffs will downgrade your apps

Even the US Congress has played its part in this orchestrated drama, dispatching a delegation to India recently to extol the virtues of the bilateral strategic partnership. It is a classic feint-the legislature offering honeyed words while the executive brandishes the stick.

Indians remain dangerously naive about this dynamic. To advance relations with America, the logic goes, India must concede everything and expect nothing in return.

The three post-birthday salvos appear calibrated to maximize leverage in the trade negotiations, where Trump seeks to curb India's purchases of cheap Russian energy and pry open its markets to American firms.

Consider the H-1B $100,000 fee first. Indians hold about 73% of these visas, which are vital for the country's information-technology sector. Firms such as Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys and Wipro now face billions in extra costs, curbing new hires and threatening the $125 billion in annual remittances that sustain economies in states like Andhra Pradesh and Telangana.

Beyond economics, the policy erodes Modi's standing among the Indian diaspora in America, who Trump evidently hopes will blame the prime minister for jeopardizing their prospects.

The revocation of the Chabahar exemption delivers a sharper geopolitical blow. India has invested heavily in the port-signing a 10-year operating agreement with Iran in May 2024-to secure a corridor to Afghanistan and Central Asia, circumventing Pakistan and countering China's sway via the nearby Gwadar port.

The US waiver, granted in 2018 under Trump's first term, had shielded this project from sanctions. Its abrupt withdrawal, effective September 29, imperils $500 million in Indian commitments and risks broader isolation if Modi resists American demands.

Finally, the drug-transit listing-announced on September 15 but amplified amid the other moves-casts a shadow over India's global image. By naming India alongside 22 other countries (including China, Pakistan and Afghanistan) as a conduit for fentanyl and precursor chemicals, the US has issued what feels like a calculated slur.

Though the State Department insists the designation reflects geography and economics rather than any lapse in enforcement, it nonetheless embarrasses New Delhi at a time when Modi seeks to project himself as a Viswa Guru and India as a responsible rising power.

These steps underscore Trump's intent to squeeze India ahead of trade talks. He wants New Delhi to slash Russian oil imports-which have kept inflation in check amid global volatility-and lower barriers for the import of US goods and services.

Trump, ever the dealmaker, knows that Modi's overtures to the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, China and Russia are tactical feints , not a hard pivot away from the West.

India remains hooked on Russian arms and energy, while pursuing de-dollarized trade via BRICS+ nations. By ratcheting up pressure, Trump aims to clip India's freedom of maneuver. India's predicament stems from a deeper malaise: an unhealthy fixation on America that has warped its foreign policy.

At the heart of this error is the worldview of External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar.

Jaishankar- who wrote an article titled“India and USA: New direction” in the limited-circulation volume“Indian Foreign Policy: Challenges and Opportunities”, published by the Indian Foreign Service Institute in Delhi in 2007-articulated a vision for closer US ties.

This approach found full expression after Jaishankar's elevation in 2019. India inked four foundational defense pacts with the US, drawing it into Washington's strategic embrace.

These were cornerstones of the Obama-era“Pivot to Asia”, which cast India as a bulwark against Beijing. Yet the bet was flawed from the start, premised on the illusion that America would lavish India with the same market access, technology transfers and investments it once bestowed on China as a favored partner.

Reality proved harsher. The US never reciprocated with equivalent privileges. Free-trade talks stalled; India withdrew from the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) in 2020 amid fears of Chinese dominance, but America offered no alternative.

Negotiations with the European Union languished. Worse, Trump's first term signaled a lurch from free trade to protectionism-a shift India's policymakers ignored, blind to the expressed views of his top economic appointees.

The upshot? No economic windfall for India, but a grievous loss of strategic autonomy. Alignment with America fueled the deadly Galwan Valley clash with China in 2020, where Beijing accused New Delhi of acting as a US proxy.

Rather than reassess, India doubled down, forging deeper military ties with Washington. Trump teased factory relocations to India, but icons like General Motors, Ford and Harley-Davidson pulled out around the same time, citing regulatory hurdles and market challenges.