Russia Reveals Real Territorial Ambitions In Ukraine

In a 2006 referendum, 97% of respondents supported Transnistria joining Russia. Russia currently has approximately 1,500 troops stationed there, and the territory has long been discussed in the West as a possible platform for a Russian invasion of Moldova.

Like Ukraine, Moldova was formerly part of the Soviet Union but is now orienting itself more towards Western Europe and is currently seeking EU membership .

In addition to putting Russia in a strong position to exert pressure on Moldova, a more significant Russian presence in the Black Sea would increase Moscow's ability to project power in neighboring regions . This includes the Mediterranean, the Middle East and Africa.

The Black Sea is also a vital site for east-west transport and communications. So much so that the European Union announced a Black Sea strategy in May 2025.

The strategy recognises the region's significance for different forms of security, including its importance for the environment, access to energy and other forms of trade and economic links. The EU plans to address these security issues by developing mutually beneficial partnerships with countries in the region.

Russian control of Ukraine's Black Sea coast would be disastrous for Ukraine. It would mean the loss of Ukraine's naval assets, which make extensive and effective use of maritime drones to target Russian ships and targets in occupied Crimea.

Being cut off from direct access to the Black Sea would also severely restrict Ukraine's ability to export agricultural produce, an important source of income for an economy that has been hit hard by the war.

Re-establishing and expanding Ukraine's role as a producer of food for the world also forms the centrepiece of Kyiv's efforts to build stronger relationships with Africa and other developing regions.

In addition to its strategic importance, these regions along Ukraine's Black Sea coast also have special historical and symbolic significance for Putin's Russia. Putin himself has described Odesa as a“Russian city” and claimed that the entire coastal area rightfully belongs to Russia as spoils of its war with Turkey in the 18th century.

The Black Sea coast also plays an important role in Putin's use of Russian imperial history to justify his war against Ukraine. Empress Catherine the Great significantly expanded the Russian empire into southern Ukraine and Crimea .

For more than a decade, Putin has presented his own actions in Ukraine as a continuation of Catherine's legacy in increasing the territory controlled by Russia. An important example of this practice came in April 2014, just weeks after Russia's annexation of Crimea, when Putin used the phrase“Novorossiya” on Russian television.

This is a term dating from Catherine the Great's reign that refers to a large part of southern Ukraine, including Crimea. By invoking this historical term, Putin was signalling his intention to follow in the footsteps of the 18th-century ruler and claim these lands for Russia.

Sign up for one of our free newsletters

• The Daily Report Start your day right with Asia Times' top stories
• AT Weekly Report A weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories

In 2014, Moscow not only made a rhetorical claim on the city of Odesa and its surrounding region – it took active steps to turn that claim into reality. In the spring of that year, Russia used disinformation to persuade local people in eastern parts of Ukraine that the government in Kyiv did not have their best interests at heart and even posed a danger to them.

At the same time, Russia provided money, weapons and training to local militant groups looking to stir up trouble. These efforts were not limited to areas of the Donbas region, where they met with some success. They were also attempted in Odesa , where they were rebuffed.

More than a decade later, a map on the walls of Russia's Ministry of Defense showing the Odesa region as part of Russia demonstrates that Moscow has not abandoned its ambition to gather up lands that were once part of the Russian empire.

As Kyiv's European allies debate the extent of their involvement in providing security guarantees for Ukraine, there are still plenty of unanswered questions about the precise nature of the reassurance force being planned by the“coalition of the willing.”

Jennifer Mathers is senior lecturer in international politics, Aberystwyth University

This edited article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article .

Sign up here to comment on Asia Times stories Or Sign in to an existing accoun

Thank you for registering!

An account was already registered with this email. Please check your inbox for an authentication link.

• Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
• Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
• Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
• Click to print (Opens in new window) Print