
403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
Federal Judge Questions Trump’s Harvard Funding Cut
(MENAFN) A U.S. federal judge expressed constitutional doubts regarding the Trump administration's move to withdraw over $2.6 billion in federal funds from Harvard University, calling some government claims "mind boggling," according to a news agency on Monday.
At a hearing held in Boston, Judge Allison Burroughs scrutinized the Justice Department lawyers’ explanations that the funding reduction was justified due to Harvard’s alleged insufficient handling of antisemitism on campus.
The case involved Harvard’s lawsuit against the Trump administration’s decision to drastically reduce the federal financial support, which the university asserts infringes upon the First Amendment rights.
Harvard’s legal counsel and faculty representatives argued that the action violated constitutional safeguards and lacked a legitimate legal foundation, requesting a summary judgment — a court decision rendered without a full trial.
"There are limits to what you can terminate, and why, and how," Judge Burroughs remarked during the hearing.
No immediate verdict was announced by Judge Burroughs, who is anticipated to deliver a written ruling at a later date.
President Donald Trump pledged to promptly challenge the decision, expressing confidence that the judge will rule unfavorably against his administration.
"When she rules against us, we will IMMEDIATELY appeal, and WIN," he stated on his Truth Social platform.
At a hearing held in Boston, Judge Allison Burroughs scrutinized the Justice Department lawyers’ explanations that the funding reduction was justified due to Harvard’s alleged insufficient handling of antisemitism on campus.
The case involved Harvard’s lawsuit against the Trump administration’s decision to drastically reduce the federal financial support, which the university asserts infringes upon the First Amendment rights.
Harvard’s legal counsel and faculty representatives argued that the action violated constitutional safeguards and lacked a legitimate legal foundation, requesting a summary judgment — a court decision rendered without a full trial.
"There are limits to what you can terminate, and why, and how," Judge Burroughs remarked during the hearing.
No immediate verdict was announced by Judge Burroughs, who is anticipated to deliver a written ruling at a later date.
President Donald Trump pledged to promptly challenge the decision, expressing confidence that the judge will rule unfavorably against his administration.
"When she rules against us, we will IMMEDIATELY appeal, and WIN," he stated on his Truth Social platform.

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Stocktwits Launches Stocktoberfest With Graniteshares As Title Partner
- Cryptolists Recognised As“Crypto Affiliate Of The Year” At SBC's Affiliate Leaders Awards 2025
- Forex Expo Dubai 2025 Conference To Feature 150+ Global FX And Fintech Leaders
- Fitell Corporation Launches Solana (SOL) Digital Asset Treasury With $100M Financing Facility, With Focus On Yield And On-Chain Defi Innovation
- Cregis And Kucoin Host Institutional Web3 Forum Discussing Industry Trends And Opportunities
- BTCC Exchange Crosses 10 Million Users: Head Of Operations Alex Hung On Building For The Long Term
Comments
No comment