
Supreme Court Holds Husband Liable For Wife's Stock Market Debts Based On Oral Contract - What Does This Mean?
In its ruling, the apex court noted that a husband can be held“jointly and severally liable for his wife's Stock market debts” on the basis of an oral contract and depending on the nature of their financial dealings, it said. We explain.
The Case: AC Choksi Vs Jatin Pratap DesaiAccording to a case filed by stock brokers AC Chokshi, husband-wife couple Jatin Pratap Desai and Heena Jatin Desai approached them in 1999 to open trading accounts, as per the report.
In 2001, Jatin tried to offset the losses in wife Heena's accounts by transferring some credit against the debt. However, Heena's debt ballooned to ₹1.18 crore due to the 2001 stock market crash and this is when AC Choksi attempted to recover the amount from her husband.
AC Choksi initiated arbitration in the tribunal seeking the ₹1.18 crore, plus interest of 9 per cent. The tribunal held that family transactions are undertaken by one party's accounts due to documentation and tax reasons, but in an appeal set aside the compensation award.
The broker thus approached the Bombay High Court, which held that Jatin and Heena are each separate entities with distinct client codes and accounts and seeking the husband to cover the wife's financial losses was“perverse and illegal”. Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Comments
No comment