
Al Jolani Or Al Shraa?
There are also those who prefer to deepen the image of Al Jolani as a product of Takfirist organisations because this portrayal aids them in opposing the new Syrian rulers. Among these are Iran and its allies, who perceive any success of the new Syrian leadership as solidifying their regional defeat and losing critical geographical influence. Syria had previously been a major arena for Iran's regional expansion, be it militarily, culturally, economically, and even demographically.
It is too early-and indeed unfair-to pass judgments on the developments in Syria and the performance of its new leadership. However, surrounding Syria are forces with varying interests: some seek to make the new Syria a sphere of their influence, others want it stable and unified, and still others aim to see it politically fragmented and descending into chaos.
Between Abu Mohammad Al Jolani and Ahmad Al Sharaa lies a distance that is not just about appearances, language, and rhetoric. This distance is defined by the behavior of the other factions ruling Syria today and how they govern the people. Are we witnessing transformations across all factions, or is this merely a political façade?
It is clear that Al Jolani is no longer welcomed by Ahmad Al Shraa, which is a positive development. However, the crucial factor is whether the performance of his associates will bolster Ahmad Al Shraa's position and not resurrect the image of Al Jolani. This is particularly important given that some regional powers do not favour Ahmad al-Shar'ah but rather prefer Abu Mohammmad Al Jolani with his historical baggage.

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Comments
No comment