Kerala: Animal Husbandry Department's Mark List Rectification Evidence OUT
Also read: Kerala: Woman acquires govt job with fake mark list; actual topper struggling in life
The original owner of the mark list, Jessi, in this case, is reported to be currently employed as a sheep herder. The situation described involves a discrepancy in the marks information for the 1990 batch, where Ramadevi is recorded with 99 percent marks. However, it was revealed that Jessy from the subsequent batch signed the register and obtained the certificate. The search for Jessy led to a small house in Vembaya, where it was discovered that her life was now centered around tending to a flock of sheep. Jessy, whose signature is on the register, clarified that it was indeed her signature. However, Jessy claims to be unaware of anyone using the certificate in question.
The Custodian of Records is with the Deputy Director at the Management Training Centre in Kudappanakunn. Permission from the Director of the Animal Welfare Department is required for examinees to destroy records, and no such permission has been granted. In response to Asianet News' application for Ramadevi's educational qualifications, the department claims that no documents are present in the office. Simultaneously, after Asianet News initiated an investigation into the forgery, the principal training officer of the department filed a complaint with the Perurkada police, alleging that the documents were missing. This suggests that numerous individuals may have intervened to safeguard the officer who was promoted by manipulating the marks, even to the extent of making the documents in the office disappear.
Ramadevi started her work in a clerical post in the Department of Animal Husbandry through a dependant appointment in 1994. She then reached the gazetted post of Senior Instructor through promotion. As per rules, a minimum of 98 percent marks in the Chick Sexing and Hatchery Management course is needed to become a junior instructor. However, Ramadevi passed the course in 1990 with 96 percent marks.
According to the documents obtained under the Right to Information Act in 2016, it is clear that there is a huge fraud.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research
- Manuka Honey Market Report 2024, Industry Growth, Size, Share, Top Compan...
- Modular Kitchen Market 2024, Industry Growth, Share, Size, Key Players An...
- Acrylamide Production Cost Analysis Report: A Comprehensive Assessment Of...
- Fish Sauce Market 2024, Industry Trends, Growth, Demand And Analysis Repo...
- Australia Foreign Exchange Market Size, Growth, Industry Demand And Forec...
- Cold Pressed Oil Market Trends 2024, Leading Companies Share, Size And Fo...
- Pasta Sauce Market 2024, Industry Growth, Share, Size, Key Players Analys...
Comments
No comment