Mediation Fails To Solve Dispute Over Syngenta Insecticide In India

2022-06-19 03:10:29

An attempt to mediate a dispute between crop science company Syngenta and a group of NGOs over the sale of an insecticide in India has acrimoniously collapsed.

This content was published on June 17, 2022 - 15:10 June 17, 2022 - 15:10 swissinfo.ch/mga

Português (pt) Mediação não resolve disputa sobre inseticida Syngenta na Índia

Both parties blamed each other for failing to make progress on resolving claims that Syngenta's Polo insecticide presents a serious health hazard to farmers.

The Swiss pressure group Public Eye was one of five NGOs that triggered the mediation process in 2020External link . The NGOs contend that 51 Indian farmers have been harmedExternal link by Syngenta's Polo product – a claim that the Basel-based company refutes.

The mediation was conducted by the Swiss National Contact Point (NCP) of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in Bern.

But on Thursday arbitrators said talks had collapsed, mainly resulting from disagreements connected to a separate civil action filed with a Basel court.

A farmer from the Yavatmal region of India and the widows of two deceased farm workers have filed compensation claims with the court.

The court case reduced the scope of the mediation process. NCP mediators felt that determining whether the Polo insecticide had poisoned farmers could prejudice these ongoing proceedings.

'Shortcomings' and 'no meaningful dialogue'

Public Eye complained that the failed mediation was a violation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and that its calls to protect the future health of farmers have gone unanswered.

“The NCP procedure as applied in Switzerland today once again demonstrates the shortcomings of this non-judicial mechanism that relies entirely on the goodwill of corporations and falls short of providing remedy for victims of human rights abuses,” the NGO stated.

Syngenta said it regretted there had been“no meaningful dialogue” with NGOs during the arbitration process. The company said its proposals of“constructive, forward-looking measures”, such an audit of its Indian operations and training for farmers, had been ignored as“the NGOs focused solely on retroactive claims for damages”.

“Mediation can have a chance of success only if both parties have a fundamental interest in reaching an amicable solution and do not seek to use the process exclusively for other purposes,” the company added.

Why Switzerland matters for the tropical forests

While there is this deep-rooted tradition of respect of the environment in Switzerland it does not necessarily extend beyond the country's borders.

Articles in this story

Why Switzerland matters for the tropical forests

Tags:

Politics
Environment
Law and order
Religion
Business
Latest News

In compliance with the JTI standards

More: SWI swissinfo.ch certified by the Journalism Trust Initiative

Contributions under this article have been turned off. You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here . Please join us!

If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at english@swissinfo.ch .

More
More

MENAFN19062022000210011054ID1104396369

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.