(MENAFN- The Rio Times) Honduras is heading toward tense elections that have become about far more than who sits in the presidential palace.

They are now a proxy battle over China's influence, U.S. credibility and whether the country drifts toward the same institutional breakdown seen in Venezuela and Nicaragua.

President Xiomara Castro, a self-declared leftist whose Libre party broke with Taiwan in 2023 to recognise Beijing, is seeking to keep her movement in power.

Her critics say she is centralising control over courts, prosecutors and the electoral system while courting Chinese money and political backing. Her supporters insist she is cleaning up a corrupt system dominated for decades by traditional parties.

The immediate crisis was triggered when Attorney General Johel Zelaya, close to the presidency, released audio recordings that allegedly show a member of the National Electoral Council, a National Party lawmaker and a military officer discussing how to sabotage the 30 November vote.



The government presents this as proof of a plot by conservative parties to engineer an“electoral coup.” The opposition calls the audios manipulated and accuses the prosecutor of weaponising justice to intimidate election officials who refuse to bow to the ruling party.
Honduras tests whether democratic rules still hold
In Washington, the U.S. House Foreign Affairs Committee has sounded the alarm over what it calls unconstitutional moves by the Castro government to tilt the playing field.

Lawmakers draw direct parallels with the step-by-step erosion of democracy in Nicaragua and Venezuela and warn that a crisis in Honduras could fuel migration and strengthen drug-trafficking networks.

The Organization of American States has called an urgent meeting, backing its election-observation mission and urging Honduran institutions – including the armed forces – to protect the autonomy of the electoral authority and the safety of its staff.

For outsiders, Honduras may seem distant. But this fight will show whether a China-friendly government can bend democratic rules without serious consequences, or whether domestic institutions, regional pressure and a fragmented opposition can still hold a fragile democracy on course.

MENAFN21112025007421016031ID1110380733