By Gaurav Bhagat, Founder, Gaurav Bhagat Academy:In November 2025, a car exploded near the Red Fort and jolted Delhi awake. It was the city's first big bombing in over ten years. Right away, the government called it terrorism, brought out the tough UAPA law, and handed the case to the National Investigation Agency. Prime Minister Narendra Modi didn't mince words; he vowed that the“conspirators behind this will not be spared.” The incident is going to test and probably alter the foreign policy doctrine of India beyond the immediate investigation and security reaction in terms of the type of diplomacy it will use, the narrative it will build on the global stage, and how it will react to similar terror acts. With highly educated suspects implicated in the latest plot, the Delhi bombing also highlights a new“white-collar” face of terror networks, raising urgent questions about how India and its allies will confront this changing threat.

A Terror Strike at the Capital's Heart

At least 13 people were immediately killed, and numerous others were injured in the explosion that occurred in Delhi on a busy evening close to Red Fort. Due to the fact that this was Delhi's biggest incident since 2011, there was a citywide security alert and increased vigilance across the country. The authorities declared this to be a terrorist incident and sealed off the site for forensic teams within hours. The method was a likely vehicle-borne IED that immediately raised red flags over an organized terror module at work.

Investigators didn't have to search far. Just hours before the explosion, police and intelligence teams had already swept through neighboring states. The timing made it look like an interstate or even a cross-border terror group was behind the Delhi bombing. Security forces discovered an incredible amount of explosives, detonators, and bomb-making materials while apprehending seven suspects from various districts after several days of nonstop work. Nearly 3,000 kg of explosive materials and IED components were found in hideouts in Faridabad, an industrial city only 30 km from Delhi, suggesting a much larger conspiracy. According to investigators, this haul probably foiled a planned "synchronized series of explosions" in the National Capital Region, perhaps timed for a symbolic date in early December.

Doctrine Under Strain: From "Zero Tolerance" to Calculated Restraint?

India has taken a more forceful stance on fighting terror the past few years, especially if the proof shows the group is in or backed by Pakistan. PM Modi has said again and again they will not hold back and will take action over the border if a major attack happens. After the Pulwama suicide attack in 2019, India hit back hard. They sent jets deep into Pakistan, striking a Jaish-e-Mohammed camp in Balakot. The same kind of attack occurred in 2016; militants stormed an army base in Uri and killed 19 soldiers. India attacked terrorist strongholds well inside Pakistan and conducted what it termed "surgical strikes" across the Line of Control in Kashmir thereafter. Back then, people in India cheered the move. The international community took notice too. They respected India's bold stand but also the fact that it didn't rush headlong into a bigger fight.

Then, in 2025, terror struck again. On April 25, terrorists attacked pilgrims in Pahalgam, Kashmir, leaving 25 dead. The Indian government pointed the finger at groups backed by Pakistan. After that, there was a short but fierce conflict in which India conducted airstrikes deep into Pakistan, and in response, Pakistan tried for four days in an attempt to destroy military installations. After the brief conflict in May 2025, Prime Minister Modi made it clear if there's another terrorist attack, India would treat it like an act of war. That speech was more than mere words; it was a stern warning to Pakistan. India was ready to go all in, even launch a full-scale military attack if pushed.

The blast in Delhi is the first big test of that claim. The government called it a terror attack right away and used anti-terrorism laws to make it clear this is part of the bigger jihadist war India is in. It is strange that New Delhi has not pointed fingers out loud yet. Even though evidence pointed to the Delhi group's links with the Pakistan-based JeM, the same group India attacked in 2019 and in the May 2025 fight, the officials have not labeled the blast as a Pakistani attack. Logical links were found: the busted-down group apparently had ties to another Kashmiri extremist group and to JeM. India might be downplaying the Pakistan element for now by emphasizing the domestic dimension over the foreign one.

Diplomacy and Global Messaging After the Blast

Outreach and diplomacy, not military action, are the initial responses of India to the Delhi explosion. Within days, New Delhi began reaching out to overseas partners and allies for support. Statements of solidarity flowed in. "India and Israel stand firmly against terror. Our cities may experience terror, but our souls will never be shaken," said a sorrowful but defiant message from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Such prominent backing underlines India's expanding counterterrorism cooperation relationship with countries like Israel. The attack was denounced by the US and its European allies, who also subtly recognized India's right to self-defense.

The goal of India's international messaging regarding the Delhi blast has been to draw attention to the larger problem of terrorism coming from its surrounding area. In essence, New Delhi seeks to remind the world that the events that occurred in Delhi are a part of the same Islamist danger that poses a threat to several societies. Instead of presenting it solely as an India-Pakistan conflict, it is a means of constructing a narrative of shared concern. India is likely to support this narrative in international forums. For example, Indian ambassadors at the UN are likely to bring up the Delhi explosion while reiterating calls for coordinated action against terrorism. Support may also be mobilized through the use of India's standing in organizations such as the G20. Although the G20 is predominantly an economic body, the G20 presidency held by India in 2023 ensured that counterterrorism found mention in the leaders' proclamation. The Dubai connection in this case really highlights why keeping an eye on international financial surveillance matters, especially when it comes to tracking funds used for terrorism. India plans to work closely with its Gulf partners, especially the UAE, to cut off these financial channels and extradite suspects if needed.

Looking Ahead: Balancing Power and Prudence

India's response to terror is a bit of a tightrope walk. The government has a tough stance but doesn't rush to blame anyone right away. That kind of restraint shows they know how quickly things can spiral if they push too hard. In the end, they want to send a strong message: don't mess with us, without letting things blow up into a bigger fight or drawing unwanted attention from the rest of the world. Lastly, the Delhi blast underlines the need for a comprehensive strategy that links raw strength, shrewd diplomacy, and inner steel. Counter-terror will be the core of India's foreign policy in the days to come; it will be everything from intel sharing with friendly states to development aid to places like Afghanistan, which cut down on extremism, to talking and setting standards on the world stage against terror. India has made it clear: fighting terrorism sits at the top of its foreign policy list. If there's any upside to this attack, it's that India's likely to build stronger partnerships and come up with a sharper strategy to tackle terrorism in today's world.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views or stance of the organization. The organization assumes no responsibility for the content shared.

MENAFN18112025007385015968ID1110360264