CRYPTO TREASURY COMPANIES ARE ‘A TIME BOMB TO THE ECOSYSTEM’
(MENAFN- Perceptiona) Investment professionals working in digital assets are increasingly concerned about the boom in Bitcoin treasuries as more publicly-listed companies hold Bitcoin as a reserve asset on their balance sheets, a poll (1) by London-based Nickel Digital Asset Management (Nickel), Europe’s leading digital assets hedge fund manager founded by alumni of Bankers Trust, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan, shows.
Nearly one in three (32%) respondents agreed the growing trend is a time bomb to the digital assets ecosystem while 29% said crypto treasury companies are an attractive but fragile vehicle.
Bitcoin treasury companies, which hold Bitcoin as a significant portion of their corporate treasury reserves alongside or in place of traditional assets like cash or bonds, could potentially pose a risk to the digital asset ecosystem through the amplified volatility and risk of systemic shocks if they have highly leveraged balance sheets.
Some Bitcoin treasury companies can rely on acquiring Bitcoin using capital raised from public equity or debt markets. This could create a dangerous feedback loop during market downturns involving forced selling if the price of Bitcoin falls sharply.
The poll which drew responses from senior investment bankers in the UK, US, Switzerland and Singapore found support for the growth in Bitcoin treasury companies – more than a quarter (27%) said they are key enablers of adoption of digital assets. Around one in eight (13%) said they were neutral or still evaluating the trend.
Data from BitcoinTreasuries.net(2) shows the number of Bitcoin held by publicly-listed companies is around 1.01 million with 190 companies holding it on their balance sheets. It estimates a further 139 entities including governments, private companies, ETFs and other funds, exchanges and custodians and DeFi smart contracts hold Bitcoin.
Software group Strategy – previously known as Micro Strategy – accounts for around 63% of Bitcoin holdings by publicly-listed companies and the US accounts for 79% of all entities holding Bitcoin identified by BitcoinTreasuries.net. However, organisations in the UK, Canada, Japan and Hong Kong are also investing.
Previous research(3 from Nickel done in January 2025 with institutional investors and wealth managers in the US, UK, Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, Brazil and the United Arab Emirates who collectively manage around $1.1 trillion in assets found strong support for publicly-listed companies holding Bitcoin.
Around nine out of 10 (86%) favour the idea with 18% saying they strongly favour it. Just 1% are opposed to publicly-listed companies holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset while 13% are neutral on the subject.
Anatoly Crachilov, CEO and Founding Partner at Nickel Digital, said: “Back in January, we saw overwhelming institutional support for listed companies adding digital assets to their balance sheets. Fast forward to today, and sentiment has clearly become more nuanced.“
“While a significant share of professionals still view corporate treasuries as a driver of mainstream adoption, a growing number now warn of the risks such strategies could pose. This divergence in opinion highlights how quickly the debate around corporate Bitcoin holdings is evolving—and why rigorous risk management must sit at the heart of any such approach.”
Nearly one in three (32%) respondents agreed the growing trend is a time bomb to the digital assets ecosystem while 29% said crypto treasury companies are an attractive but fragile vehicle.
Bitcoin treasury companies, which hold Bitcoin as a significant portion of their corporate treasury reserves alongside or in place of traditional assets like cash or bonds, could potentially pose a risk to the digital asset ecosystem through the amplified volatility and risk of systemic shocks if they have highly leveraged balance sheets.
Some Bitcoin treasury companies can rely on acquiring Bitcoin using capital raised from public equity or debt markets. This could create a dangerous feedback loop during market downturns involving forced selling if the price of Bitcoin falls sharply.
The poll which drew responses from senior investment bankers in the UK, US, Switzerland and Singapore found support for the growth in Bitcoin treasury companies – more than a quarter (27%) said they are key enablers of adoption of digital assets. Around one in eight (13%) said they were neutral or still evaluating the trend.
Data from BitcoinTreasuries.net(2) shows the number of Bitcoin held by publicly-listed companies is around 1.01 million with 190 companies holding it on their balance sheets. It estimates a further 139 entities including governments, private companies, ETFs and other funds, exchanges and custodians and DeFi smart contracts hold Bitcoin.
Software group Strategy – previously known as Micro Strategy – accounts for around 63% of Bitcoin holdings by publicly-listed companies and the US accounts for 79% of all entities holding Bitcoin identified by BitcoinTreasuries.net. However, organisations in the UK, Canada, Japan and Hong Kong are also investing.
Previous research(3 from Nickel done in January 2025 with institutional investors and wealth managers in the US, UK, Germany, Switzerland, Singapore, Brazil and the United Arab Emirates who collectively manage around $1.1 trillion in assets found strong support for publicly-listed companies holding Bitcoin.
Around nine out of 10 (86%) favour the idea with 18% saying they strongly favour it. Just 1% are opposed to publicly-listed companies holding Bitcoin as a reserve asset while 13% are neutral on the subject.
Anatoly Crachilov, CEO and Founding Partner at Nickel Digital, said: “Back in January, we saw overwhelming institutional support for listed companies adding digital assets to their balance sheets. Fast forward to today, and sentiment has clearly become more nuanced.“
“While a significant share of professionals still view corporate treasuries as a driver of mainstream adoption, a growing number now warn of the risks such strategies could pose. This divergence in opinion highlights how quickly the debate around corporate Bitcoin holdings is evolving—and why rigorous risk management must sit at the heart of any such approach.”

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Cartesian Launches First Outsourced Middle-Back-Office Offering For Digital Asset Funds
- R0AR Launches Buyback Vault: Bringing 1R0R To R0AR Chain Unlocks New Incentives
- FBS Analysis Shows Ethereum Positioning As Wall Street's Base Layer
- Bydfi Joins Korea Blockchain Week 2025 (KBW2025): Deepening Web3 Engagement
- Ethereum Based Meme Coin Pepeto Presale Past $6.6 Million As Exchange Demo Launches
- Moonbirds And Azuki IP Coming To Verse8 As AI-Native Game Platform Integrates With Story
Comments
No comment