
US Says Ukraine Should Not Have Used Starlink Terminals On Front Lines
A draft transfer agreement prohibited "military use" of the terminals, the report notes. They were delivered for use in hospitals, schools, communications and other civilian purposes. However, the report said that after the terminals were provided to Ukraine, USAID did not "fully define clear expectations and conditions" for how the terminals should be used nor did the agency "establish a monitoring system for the Starlink terminals."
Later, allegations surfaced that Ukraine's military had weaponized the Starlink terminals and used them to pilot drones and target artillery strikes against Russian military equipment, vehicles and mobile command centers. Ukrainian officials have acknowledged the terminals were used in military operations.
Read also: Ukraine receives 5,000 more Starlink terminals from PolandThe inspector general's report contains no new evidence that the Starlink terminals were weaponized by Ukraine. But it notes that after allegations of misuse surfaced in media reports, Starlink's parent company, SpaceX, and its chief executive Elon Musk publicly warned Ukraine against using the terminals to operate drones.
Last year, USAID's Office of Inspector General announced it had launched an inspection of Ukraine's use of the Starlink terminals to "determine the extent to which USAID mitigated the risk of misuse" of 5,175 Starlink terminals the agency delivered to Ukraine's State Service of Special Communications and Information Protection (SSSCIP) after Russia targeted Internet and telecommunications networks. USAID contracted with SpaceX and purchased 1,508 terminals for Ukraine. The company donated 3,667.
USAID explained to the inspector general that it was "logistically impossible" to keep tabs on the terminals because of the "challenging wartime environment" that resulted in its staff being "confined to hotels." Moreover, USAID said the agency "transferred responsibility for the terminals to the government of Ukraine upon delivery."
"The Agency initially drafted conditions that restricted the terminals to civilian use and required SSSCIP to establish safeguards for proper use and ensure secondary recipients agreed to conditions of use in writing," the report said. "However, it never exercised this agreement."
USAID officials told the inspector general they did not know where the terminals were or how they were used but "hoped" Ukraine "used them as intended." The report said USAID did not request information or inquire about the use of the Starlink terminals the agency delivered until after the inspector general launched its inspection last year.
Photo: spotme
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- Motif AI Enters Phase Two Of Its Growth Cycle
- BTCC Exchange Announces Triple Global Workforce Expansion At TOKEN2049 Singapore To Power Web3 Evolution
- Moonbirds And Azuki IP Coming To Verse8 As AI-Native Game Platform Integrates With Story
- Pepeto Highlights $6.8M Presale Amid Ethereum's Price Moves And Opportunities
- Industry Leader The5ers Expands Funding Programs To U.S. Traders
- Hola Prime Expands Its Platform Ecosystem With Next-Gen Tradelocker
Comments
No comment