
NHRC Seeks Action Taken Report On Caste-Derogatory Village, Locality Names Across India
The matter was brought before the NHRC through a complaint dated July 10, 2025, and considered by the Commission on July 28.
The complainant had raised serious concerns about the persistence of offensive nomenclature that reflects caste-based discrimination.
The Commission noted that such names violate the constitutional ideals of equality and human dignity, and contribute to the continued social stigma faced by the Scheduled Castes, even after over 7 decades of Independence.
Taking cognisance under Section 12 of the Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993, a Bench presided over by NHRC Member Priyank Kanoongo directed the issuance of a formal notice.
The Commission emphasised that the NHRC is empowered under the Act to investigate such matters with the authority of a civil court.
The NHRC stated:“The complainant has urged that such names be reviewed and renamed, as they are offensive and contrary to the constitutional ideals of equality and human dignity.”
The Commission also cited several key legal and administrative references to support its directive. These include a 1990 circular from the Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment instructing all governments to discontinue the use of the word 'Harijan', and a 1982 Ministry of Home Affairs directive banning the use of both 'Harijan' and 'Girijan.'
States like Odisha, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Delhi, Punjab, and Kerala have already taken steps to enforce constitutionally-appropriate terminology.
Further, the NHRC highlighted the Supreme Court's 2017 ruling in Manju Devi vs. Onkarjit Singh Ahluwalia & Others, which observed that caste-referential terms such as 'Harijan' and 'Dhobi' could constitute social insult or abuse.
The SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, particularly Section 3(1)(u), also criminalises the use of caste-based slurs, naming terms like 'Chamar', 'Bhangi', and 'Mehtar' as punishable offenses.
The Commission also referenced a 2024 Supreme Court order in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) directing the government to consider removing casteist terms such as 'Chamar', 'Kanjar', 'Chuhra', and 'Bhangi' from official records.
In its directive, the NHRC has asked all concerned authorities to compile and submit a list of towns, villages, panchayats, and other public spaces that still carry caste-indicative or derogatory names.
It has also requested a report on the measures being taken to rename or remove such terms. The deadline for submission is four weeks from the date of notice.
The Commission aims to address systemic discrimination embedded in geographical and administrative nomenclature, and to ensure that public spaces reflect the values enshrined in the Indian Constitution.

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- SPAYZ.Io White Paper Explores Opportunities, Challenges And Ambitions In Payments Industry
- Ethereum-Based Defi Crypto Mutuum Finance (MUTM) Reaches 50% Completion In Phase 6
- Currency Relaunches Under New Leadership, Highlights 2025 Achievements
- Izumi Finance And Nasdaq-Listed Company CIMG Co-Launch $20M Upstarts Fund
- Tradesta Becomes The First Perpetuals Exchange To Launch Equities On Avalanche
- Bydfi Highlights 'BUIDL' Ethos During Newcastle United Match Against Arsenal
Comments
No comment