
403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
Supreme Court Approves Federal Nuclear Waste License in Texas
(MENAFN) On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Texas in its attempt to contest federal approval of a temporary nuclear waste storage facility owned by a private company. The Court determined that Texas lacks standing to challenge the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) licensing decision, as it was not an official participant in the NRC’s approval process.
This ruling overturns a prior decision made by the federal appeals court in New Orleans, which had previously nullified the NRC’s license for a site located in southwest Texas. The license authorizes the facility’s operation for 40 years, with an option to extend for another 40 years.
Following the Supreme Court’s decision, reports from local media indicate that a similar facility planned for New Mexico is expected to move forward.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who penned the majority opinion, clarified that neither Texas nor the Texas-based energy company Fasken Land and Minerals had the legal standing to bring the lawsuit concerning the license.
He stated, “Under the Hobbs Act, only an aggrieved 'party' may obtain judicial review of a Commission licensing decision.”
Kavanaugh further explained, “Texas and Fasken are not license applicants, and they did not successfully intervene in the licensing proceeding. So neither was a party eligible to obtain judicial review.”
In response, the NRC released a statement highlighting that the Supreme Court’s ruling underscores the agency’s authority in these matters.
This ruling overturns a prior decision made by the federal appeals court in New Orleans, which had previously nullified the NRC’s license for a site located in southwest Texas. The license authorizes the facility’s operation for 40 years, with an option to extend for another 40 years.
Following the Supreme Court’s decision, reports from local media indicate that a similar facility planned for New Mexico is expected to move forward.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who penned the majority opinion, clarified that neither Texas nor the Texas-based energy company Fasken Land and Minerals had the legal standing to bring the lawsuit concerning the license.
He stated, “Under the Hobbs Act, only an aggrieved 'party' may obtain judicial review of a Commission licensing decision.”
Kavanaugh further explained, “Texas and Fasken are not license applicants, and they did not successfully intervene in the licensing proceeding. So neither was a party eligible to obtain judicial review.”
In response, the NRC released a statement highlighting that the Supreme Court’s ruling underscores the agency’s authority in these matters.

Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.
Most popular stories
Market Research

- BTCC Exchange Celebrates 14Th Anniversary With Launch Of First-Ever User Badge Program
- Bitmex Study Reveals 90% Drop In Extreme Bitcoin Perpetual Futures Funding Rates Since 2016, Signalling Market Maturation
- Independence Benefits Helps Federal Employees Navigate Retirement Amid VSIP Offers, TSP Volatility, And FEGLI Cost Increases
- Everstake Brings Ethereum Experts Together To Explore Post-Pectra And Institutional Adoption
- Polemos Launches $PLMS Token On MEXC And Uniswap, Advancing Web3 Gaming Infrastructure
- GAP 3 Partners FZCO Becomes Dubai's First Regulated Virtual Asset Investment Advisor With Operational License From VARA
Comments
No comment