(MENAFN- The Peninsula)
The Korea Herald
On the heels of two safety incidents involving South Korean budget airlines within a month, concerns over air travel safety are growing among passengers, prompting many to forgo cheaper fares in favor of legacy carriers.
Among them is 27-year-old Lee Ji-yun, who, while booking her upcoming trip to Osaka, Japan, with a friend, opted for round-trip tickets priced at 400,000 won ($275) instead of a budget option half that price.
“Normally, I'd go for the cheapest option because going to Japan from Korea is such a short flight,” Lee told The Korea Herald.“But the recent incidents involving budget carriers made me feel uneasy about flying with them. I felt like my safety would be better guaranteed flying with legacy carriers instead.”
Concerns over budget airline safety escalated following two major incidents.
On Dec. 29, 2024, a Jeju Air passenger aircraft crashed during an emergency landing, resulting in 179 fatalities out of the 181 people on board. Though the exact reason behind the crash is yet to be confirmed, issues such as excessive flight frequency and inadequate safety maintenance were raised following the incident.
Less than a month later on Jan. 28, an Air Busan plane caught fire at its tail before takeoff.
The incident fortunately resulted in no deaths, but speculations have still arisen as to whether the airline is liable for professional negligence regarding carry-on luggage, with the cause of the fire suspected to be a portable power bank stowed in an overhead compartment.
Lee is not alone in her reluctance to fly with low-cost carriers.
According to Air Portal, which is run by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, the number of passengers for Korea's six major LCCs -- Jeju Air, Jin Air, T'way Air, Eastar Jet, Air Busan and Air Seoul -- is recently showing a steady decline.
Between Dec. 23 and 29 last year, the six LCCs recorded a combined 1.36 million passengers, which fell to 1.16 million in the first week of January.
Though there was a slight rebound for Jan. 13 to 19, the numbers were around 9 percent lower compared to the number of passengers recorded at the end of December. However, observers forecast these numbers could decrease further following the recent Air Busan fire.
On social media platform X, several commenters spoke of an increased fear of flying.
“I've been planning this trip for months, but with the recent news of accidents involving planes, I don't feel confident about flying anymore,” wrote one user.
To minimize travelers' fear of flying and regain consumers' trust in budget carriers, experts urged for“comprehensive reform” of the aircraft maintenance system as well as an“expansion of maintenance personnel.”
“Typically, the probability of an aircraft accident resulting in fatalities is as low as 1 in 10 million, but when such accidents occur, it can lead to a massive number of fatalities, resulting in significant social repercussions,” aviation safety management professor Kwon Bo-hun from Far East University told The Korea Herald.
“A one-time inspection of an aircraft during an assigned inspection period is not enough. Instead, a comprehensive overhaul of the aircraft maintenance system as well an expansion in maintenance personnel is necessary.”
Kwon added that“revisions of in-flight baggage policies and aviation safety regulations” are needed to prioritize passenger safety.
“If the cause of the Air Busan fire is determined to have been caused by a portable power bank, measures to implement stricter guidelines on such items or to restrict them completely should also be considered,” Kwon continued.
According to the Land Ministry on Sunday, the government is looking into strengthening the regulations on carrying portable power banks on aircraft, to be announced by April this year.
Discussions are underway regarding stricter limits on the quantity or capacity of portable power banks that can be brought on board, as well as designating specific storage locations by law and providing vinyl pouches at each airport to block the flow of electric currents from portable power banks.
Additionally, the possibility of mandating passengers carry their portable power banks in hand is also being considered. While airlines instruct passengers before takeoff to keep their portable power banks in hand, these announcements lack enforceability, resulting in most passengers being unaware.
MENAFN02022025000063011010ID1109158435
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.