The Hollow Diplomacy Of Failed Promises

(MENAFN- Khaama Press)

In what can only be described as a diplomatic farce, Bangladesh's interim Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus has made an astonishingly tepid request to Pakistan to“settle the issues of 1971” – a remarkably weak way to address one of history's most brutal genocides.[1]
This latest exchange, occurring on the sidelines of the D-8 summit in Cairo, perfectly encapsulates the deep-rooted fragility and incompetence plaguing both nations. The meeting between Yunus and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif played out like a carefully choreographed dance of the desperate, with both sides engaging in meaningless diplomatic pleasantries while their respective nations crumble.[2]
Bangladesh, still reeling from the controversial ouster of Sheikh Hasina's government, appears desperate to legitimize its interim administration through international diplomacy. Meanwhile, Pakistan, perpetually teetering on the edge of economic collapse, clutches at any diplomatic opportunity to maintain the illusion of regional relevance.

Pakistan's response to Bangladesh's overtures was predictably evasive and characteristic of its historical approach to accountability. Sharif's casual reference to the 1974 tripartite agreement as having“settled things” while simultaneously offering to examine“other outstanding issues” exemplifies Pakistan's long-standing strategy to deny everything while feigning cooperation. This is the same Pakistan that has never formally acknowledged its genocide in 1971, which resulted in the deaths of approximately three million Bengalis.[3]
Yet now it speaks of brotherhood with Bangladesh as if decades of systematic oppression can be erased with empty diplomatic gestures. The desperation of both nations becomes particularly apparent in their attempts to revive SAARC – a regional organization that has been effectively paralyzed by South Asian political tensions. Yunus's remarkable statement about wanting a SAARC summit“even if it is only for a photo session” inadvertently reveals the superficial nature of these diplomatic efforts. It serves as a perfect metaphor for the state of both nations: obsessed with appearances while lacking any substantial foundation for progress.

The domestic situations in both countries paint an even bleaker picture. Bangladesh's political stability has been severely compromised under the interim government, with increasing reports of religious persecution and suppression of democratic institutions. The country's once-promising economic growth is now threatened by political uncertainty and growing religious extremism. The removal of Sheikh Hasina's government, regardless of its flaws, has created a dangerous power vacuum that threatens to undo decades of progress. Pakistan's situation is arguably even more dire. The country's economy is in shambles, with foreign reserves barely covering two months of imports. Its industrial sector is collapsing, yet it has the audacity to offer technical assistance to Bangladesh's sugar mills. The Pakistani rupee continues its free fall, while political instability and military interference in civilian affairs remain persistent problems. Despite these fundamental issues, Pakistan continues to position itself as a regional partner for development cooperation a claim that would be laughable if it weren't so tragically delusional. The proposed areas of cooperation between the two nations border on the absurd. Discussions about collaboration in sugar industry management and dengue control seem like desperate attempts to find any common ground, no matter how insignificant. Meanwhile, both nations conveniently ignore the elephant in the room – the unresolved trauma of 1971 and Pakistan's continued refusal to acknowledge its historical crimes.

Both countries exhibit a startling inability to address their core challenges. Pakistan remains trapped in a cycle of military interference, economic decline, and political instability. Its democracy is a facade, with real power firmly in the hands of its military establishment. Bangladesh, despite its earlier economic progress, faces increasing authoritarianism and religious extremism. The installation of an interim administration signals a concerning shift away from democratic norms, with growing fears about the future of secular governance in the country. The diplomatic pleasantries exchanged in Cairo including the proposed February visit of Pakistan's Foreign Minister to Bangladesh and the invitation for Yunus to visit Pakistan are merely ceremonial gestures that will likely yield nothing substantial. These are nations that consistently fail to address their internal challenges yet pretend they can forge meaningful international partnerships.

The tragedy extends beyond their failure to address historical injustices. It lies in their apparent inability to build a meaningful future. As they perform this diplomatic dance, fundamental issues of governance, democracy, and economic stability remain unaddressed, leaving both nations vulnerable to further instability and decline. This latest round of diplomatic engagement between Dhaka and Islamabad represents more than just bilateral relations; it showcases the fundamental weakness of both states. Neither country has managed to build robust democratic institutions or stable economies despite decades of independence. Instead, they engage in diplomatic theater, making grand gestures while their domestic troubles mount.

As both nations continue their precarious balancing act between domestic instability and international relevance, this latest diplomatic exchange serves as a stark reminder of their failed aspirations. Pakistan remains haunted by its unacknowledged atrocities, unable to offer genuine reconciliation, while Bangladesh appears willing to compromise on historical justice for the sake of regional politicking. The road ahead looks increasingly uncertain for these two nations, bound together by a history of violence yet unable to forge a meaningful path forward. In this context, the call to“settle the issues of 1971” appears not as a genuine attempt at reconciliation but rather as a desperate bid for relevance by two failing states. Until both nations address their fundamental governance issues and Pakistan acknowledges its historical crimes, any diplomatic engagement between them will remain nothing more than empty theater a dance of desperation performed by two nations increasingly unable to mask their profound instability and incompetence.

[1]

[2]

[3]

DISCLAIMER – The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They do not purport to reflect the opinions or views of The Khaama Press News Agency . We welcome opinions and submissions to Khaama Press Opinions/Exclusives – Please email them to ... .

MENAFN24122024000228011069ID1109025898