Biden Places Politics Over Strategy In US Steel Sale

More recently, critics charge that Nippon Steel operations in China compromise its management and pose a“material national security risk.”

“We cannot allow one of the largest American steelmakers to be gobbled up by a foreign entity with ties to the Chinese Communist Party and its military-industrial apparatus,”Senator JD Vance, Republican of Ohio,
told
the
Financial Times.

Nippon Steel denies the allegations, saying that it has limited operations in China and that entities there have no access to information about operations outside China.

Rejection of the deal – even equivocation – is a mistake. Nippon Steel's purchase would contribute to US Steel's modernization and allow its continued operation. It would help US Steel become more competitive, putting a crucial industry on a more sustainable footing.

Allowing the deal to go ahead would show that the US is genuinely committed to economic partnership with key allies and partners and the integration of their economies in ways that benefit all. It would facilitate cooperation, promoting efficiency and innovation.

It would set an example for other countries as they struggle to balance the protection of domestic industries from predation and encouraging foreign investment. It would show that the US is not a hypocrite, demanding access to foreign markets without offering the same to competitors.

This is especially important for Japan, which has been restructuring its foreign and security policy outlook to
align more closely
with that of the US and be the United States'“global partner .” Japanese companies have invested billions of dollars in the US in recent years and they and their government are pursuing deep integration on cutting-edge technologies that are key to leadership in the 21st
century.

These demonstrations and signals are increasingly necessary for US credibility and leadership in the Indo-Pacific.

Since 2016, when Obama flinched and let politics override strategic concerns, decisions in Washington have contributed to an image of unreliability among regional economic partners.

Blocking the Nippon Steel purchase would confirm that TPP was no anomaly, that neither Democrats or Republicans can be counted on to secure US leadership in economic – and hence strategic – affairs, and that the US is willing to cede this vital ground to China.

If the US is serious about competing with China, then Washington must address the needs of regional nations – as they see them. Economic opportunities are foremost on their list and they have
judged
the US to be failing on this vital metric. China is filling that gap.

Of course, no US president can ignore domestic political considerations. Biden doesn't have to. He can support the deal for both political and strategic reasons. The second most significant reason to back the deal – after the strategic rationale – is the parlous state of US Steel.

The company has been losing money for years. Not only has it failed to innovate but,
explained
one industry analyst, US Steel“peaked out in 1916” and“it's been downhill ever since,” driven by a corporate culture that's content to be
a follower
rather than an industry leader. That's why shareholders
voted
to approve the deal earlier this month; they know that it's the best way to revitalize this humbled icon.

Sign up for one of our free newsletters

• The Daily ReportStart your day right with Asia Times' top stories
• AT Weekly ReportA weekly roundup of Asia Times' most-read stories

Biden should argue that a sale to Nippon Steel will ensure US Steel's survival. New management can help modernize the company and install a new mentality in labor and in executive suites. Japan companies are more receptive to stakeholder interests, rather than just those of shareholders.

They are eager to show that they are reliable partners and it is in their self-interest (and the national interest) to promote deeper integration between the two economies. That should help protect jobs that matter to unions and the politicians that represent them.

Biden shouldn't pander to blue-collar voters, peddling untruths about jobs or equivocating until after the election. Both would confirm a belief that US politicians are cynical and untrustworthy and that deceptions, omissions or half-truths are to be expected from them.

Rather, Biden should make a straightforward case to US voters – and US partners – that he understands the national interest and that this sale best protects it and offers the best chance to preserve steel jobs. It wouldn't undo the mistake of 2016 but it would avoid adding another decision to that list of failures.

Brad Glosserman (...) is deputy director of and visiting professor at the Center for Rule-Making Strategies at Tama University as well as senior adviser (nonresident) at Pacific Forum. He is the author of Peak Japan: The End of Great Ambitions .

This article was originally published by Pacific Forum . It is republished with permission.