Supreme Court to Consider GOP's Appeal in South Carolina Voting Lines Dispute

(MENAFN) On Monday, the Supreme Court announced its decision to review a case brought forth by GOP legislative leaders in South Carolina, who seek to reinstate voting lines for a congressional district that were invalidated due to allegations of unlawful racial gerrymandering. The dispute revolves around the redistricting plan implemented by South Carolina's Republican-controlled state legislature following the 2020 Census, which favored Republicans in Congressional District 1—a GOP-majority district currently represented by Rep. Nancy Mace, encompassing Charleston to Hilton Head Island.

Previously, Democratic Rep. Joe Cunningham held the district for one term before losing to Mace in the 2020 election, with Mace subsequently securing reelection. However, voting rights groups challenged the newly drawn voting lines for three of the congressional districts, including District 1, arguing that they were intentionally designed as racial gerrymanders, aiming to diminish the influence of Black voters.

Following an extensive eight-day trial, a three-judge federal district court panel unanimously ruled in January that Congressional District 1 constituted an unconstitutional racial gerrymander, as race was the predominant factor in the redistricting plan's adoption. The court found that the mapmakers deliberately targeted a 17% Black voting-age population for the district, achieving this by relocating approximately 30,000 Black voters from the 1st District into Congressional District 6, currently represented by Democratic Rep. Jim Clyburn.

Seeking a different outcome, South Carolina Republicans turned to the Supreme Court, contending that the lower court failed to assume the good faith of the state's General Assembly when drawing the voting lines. Additionally, they argued that the voting rights groups did not adequately demonstrate that race, rather than political considerations, explained the configuration of District 1.

The Supreme Court's decision to take up the case signifies its willingness to examine the issue and provide a resolution. This legal challenge carries significant implications for South Carolina's congressional district lines and the broader conversation surrounding gerrymandering, racial representation, and the balance between political and racial considerations in redistricting processes.

MENAFN16052023000045014228ID1106251968