403
Sorry!!
Error! We're sorry, but the page you were looking for doesn't exist.
Rubio Refuses to Answer Israel Nuclear Question
(MENAFN) US Secretary of State Marco Rubio sidestepped a direct question Wednesday on whether Israel holds nuclear weapons, telling lawmakers the matter is too sensitive for open session and warrants a classified forum instead.
Appearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rubio stopped just short of confirmation — while making clear where global opinion stands.
"Before speaking frankly, I think most of the world assesses that they do, but they've never acknowledged that publicly," he told the panel.
"Delicate Balancing Act" Between Competing Interests
Rubio framed his reluctance as a matter of diplomatic necessity rather than evasion, acknowledging the web of competing interests surrounding Israel's long-ambiguous nuclear posture.
"These things require delicate balancing action between different equities," he said, neither confirming nor denying Israel's nuclear capabilities.
He assured committee members that a fuller briefing was possible under the right conditions, promising a "more fulsome answer" in a setting that was "both classified and sensitive."
Decades of Deliberate Ambiguity
Rubio framed Israel's long-standing refusal to publicly acknowledge its nuclear program not as an oversight, but as a deliberate and enduring pillar of US foreign policy architecture.
"It's a serious question," he said, noting that Israel's non-acknowledgment of a nuclear program has long been "a feature of our foreign policy."
Israel has maintained a policy of nuclear ambiguity for decades — neither confirming nor denying possession of atomic weapons — a stance that Washington has historically declined to challenge publicly.
Appearing before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rubio stopped just short of confirmation — while making clear where global opinion stands.
"Before speaking frankly, I think most of the world assesses that they do, but they've never acknowledged that publicly," he told the panel.
"Delicate Balancing Act" Between Competing Interests
Rubio framed his reluctance as a matter of diplomatic necessity rather than evasion, acknowledging the web of competing interests surrounding Israel's long-ambiguous nuclear posture.
"These things require delicate balancing action between different equities," he said, neither confirming nor denying Israel's nuclear capabilities.
He assured committee members that a fuller briefing was possible under the right conditions, promising a "more fulsome answer" in a setting that was "both classified and sensitive."
Decades of Deliberate Ambiguity
Rubio framed Israel's long-standing refusal to publicly acknowledge its nuclear program not as an oversight, but as a deliberate and enduring pillar of US foreign policy architecture.
"It's a serious question," he said, noting that Israel's non-acknowledgment of a nuclear program has long been "a feature of our foreign policy."
Israel has maintained a policy of nuclear ambiguity for decades — neither confirming nor denying possession of atomic weapons — a stance that Washington has historically declined to challenge publicly.
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment