March 8 Vote Poll: Media Licence Fee Initiative Could Go Either Way
I work as editor and correspondent at the Federal Palace. I report on Swiss politics for the Swiss Abroad and manage our political talk show Let's Talk. I started in local journalism in the early nineties and have worked in many journalistic fields, held management positions and covered a range of topics. I joined SWI swissinfo in 2017.
-
More from this aut
German Departm
-
Deutsch
de
Abstimmung vom 8. März: Alles offen bei der SRG-Initiative
Original
Read more: Abstimmung vom 8. März: Alles offen bei der SRG-Initi
Français
fr
Tout reste ouvert pour l'initiative SSR, selon le premier sondage
Read more: Tout reste ouvert pour l'initiative SSR, selon le premier so
Italiano
it
Votazioni federali dell'8 marzo: per l'Iniziativa SSR tutto è ancora aperto
Read more: Votazioni federali dell'8 marzo: per l'Iniziativa SSR tutto è ancora a
Русский
ru
Референдум 8 марта 2026 года: итоги первого опроса
Read more: Референдум 8 марта 2026 года: итоги первого о
It is a special challenge this time around for the gfs pollsters commissioned by the SBC (Swissinfo's parent company) to conduct the survey. They have to divine how Swiss electorate will vote on the SBC initiative to reduce the media licence fee but are constrained by the need to use SBC's online platforms to do so.
How do gfs take this factor into account?
“If we ask for opinions on the SBC initiative via the SBC channels, we naturally risk a distortion,” says co-director Lukas Golder. There are methods to correct for this: queries about past voting behavior, for example, against which the current statements are weighted and calibrated.
“The correction in the weighting that we have made takes somewhat greater account of government-critical and rural-conservative circles,” says Golder about the poll results. For example, there are already clear insights in three of the four referendum proposals. However, the situation remains difficult to assess with the SBC initiative.
SBC initiative: No clear trend but questions remainAt first glance, the SBC initiative, that wants to reduce the annual media licence fee to CHF200, looks like it will be rejected at this point in time: 52% are against it.
“But with a sampling error of 3%, it could also be a rejection by 49%,” warns gfs political scientist Martina Mousson.
External ContentWhat is striking here is how synchronously the Swiss living abroad vote with the electorate at home.
In addition, gfs notes that opinion is already consolidated. The SBC initiative will therefore no longer be about persuasion but about which camp will vote in greater numbers.“Distrustful and government-critical people are already highly mobilised on this issue,” Mousson said.
Support for the initiative comes from the environment of the Swiss People's Party, partly also from circles close to the Radical-Liberals as well as from non-party members. This means that there is a clear left-right polarisation, says Martina Mousson.
It is also striking that most respondents expect a yes to the SBC initiative. This is also a sign that there is still a lot to be done. Gfs therefore speaks of a stalemate.
Mobilisation is the unknown factorThe SBC initiative, together with individual taxation, is considered the lead vote of March 8, i.e. the one that mobilises the most people to vote.
However, the mobilisation reveals another unknown.
“It is increasingly possible to mobilise under our radar. We don't see 90% of the campaigns anymore,” says Golder. What is sent on WhatsApp, for example, or which mailings end up in the mailboxes, is becoming increasingly difficult to record.
“The mobilisation alone can influence a voting result by more than 10%,” says Golder. For example, when hundreds of thousands spontaneously go to the polls at the last moment.
Individual taxation: No clear oppositionIn the case of individual taxation, which is also known as the marriage tax penalty, the starting position is clearer. In all groups from right to left, there is majority support.
External ContentSupport is even greater among Swiss citizens abroad. Around 74% of them are supportive – 10% more than respondents in Switzerland.
The most convincing argument is that the abolition of the marriage penalty promotes equality. The gfs survey also received broad approval for the statement 'this makes it more attractive for both partners to work.'
“This explains the current support for this bill even in the ranks of the Swiss People's Party supporters, says Mousson.
“We still expect resistance in the referendum campaign,” she adds.
Good support for the cash initiativeThere is also a lot of support for the 'cash is freedom initiative ' in mid-January, with 65% of respondents in favour.“However, the formation of opinion is still not very consolidated, less than with the other proposals,” says Mousson.
In particular, the Federal Council's counter-proposal to the initiative is obviously still intangible. Approval comes from the right and left. Only the supporters of the Liberal Green Party clearly reject the initiative.
External ContentThere is clear agreement among the Swiss Abroad, even more so than at home. This pattern is similar in the counter-proposal to the cash initiative.
The argument with the greatest appeal among the respondents is: 'Cash is a piece of personal freedom'. However, it also became apparent that opinions on the arguments against the initiative have not yet been consolidated.
“There can still be a lot of movement here. For us, the outcome of the vote therefore remains open,” says Mousson.
Climate fund initiative without a chance“The Climate fund initiative is in an incredibly difficult position,” says Golder.“If an initiative does not find a majority at the beginning of the referendum campaign, then it has usually already failed.” This is exactly what seems to be case with the climate fund initiative.
“The priority is completely different in today's situation,” says Golder, explaining the clear trend.“The initiative therefore seems out of time.”
External ContentWhat is striking here is the much milder rejection by the Swiss Abroad surveyed. They even tend to vote yes – albeit not very convincingly.
Among the Left and the Greens, however, support is strong. However, the majority of respondents are aware that Switzerland must set priorities for government spending.“This is the strongest argument against the initiative – and this determined 'no' attitude could even be strengthened in the referendum campaign,” says Golder.
The survey conducted by gfs on behalf of the SBC, Swissinfo's parent company, took place from January 12 to 26. A total of 15,371 people from all language regions were surveyed online, by telephone and online. The sampling error is 2.8%.
Adapted from German using AI/ac
Popular Stories Most DiscussedIn compliance with the JTI standards
More: SWI swissinfo certified by the Journalism Trust Initiati
You can find an overview of ongoing debates with our journalists here. Please join us!
If you want to start a conversation about a topic raised in this article or want to report factual errors, email us at ....
Read more
Legal Disclaimer:
MENAFN provides the
information “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept
any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images,
videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information
contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright
issues related to this article, kindly contact the provider above.

Comments
No comment